WSRP v2 draft 4 public review

The OASIS Web Services for Remote Portlets TC has recently approved Web Services for Remote Portlets Specification v2.0 as a Committee Draft and is available for public review. The public review starts from 31 October 2007, and ends 15 November 2007.

This specification was previously submitted for a 60-day public review on 24 July 2007, this 15-day review is limited in scope to changes made from the previous review. All changes are highlighted.

The specification document and related files are available here.

Highlighted PDF copy is available here:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsrp/v2/wsrp-2.0-spec-pr-04-highlight.pdf


The schema and wsdl files are available at:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsrp/v2/wsrp-2.0-bindings-pr-04.wsdl
http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsrp/v2/wsrp-2.0-extra-pr-04.xsd

http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsrp/v2/wsrp-2.0-interfaces-pr-04.wsdl

http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsrp/v2/wsrp-2.0-service-pr-04.wsdl

http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsrp/v2/wsrp-2.0-types-pr-04.xsd

Comments:

thanks

Posted by mirc on February 21, 2008 at 04:32 AM PST #

thank you very much

Posted by mirc indir on February 21, 2008 at 04:32 AM PST #

nice , thanks

Posted by forum on February 21, 2008 at 04:33 AM PST #

Nice site. Thank you

Posted by evden eve nakliyat on March 22, 2008 at 05:39 AM PDT #

thank you

Posted by ankara evden eve nakliyat on April 20, 2008 at 11:35 PM PDT #

thank you

Posted by ankara nakliyat on April 20, 2008 at 11:36 PM PDT #

thank you

Posted by evden eve nakliyat on April 20, 2008 at 11:36 PM PDT #

thank you very good
http://www.evkur.org
http://www.bayanlardernegi.com

Posted by Plastik cerrahi on July 22, 2008 at 11:21 AM PDT #

thanx

Posted by mirc on August 24, 2008 at 05:03 AM PDT #

You have a great product (and had a great name which made sense)! Why the need for a new name, with substandard design and poor branding. (Reminds me of the Royal Mail / Consignia fiasco and the BA funky tailfins disaster).
What was your new investment, a suitcase of monopoly money? Please refrain from using the art class of the local primary school for your next name change and redesign.

Posted by modifiye on January 18, 2009 at 05:34 AM PST #

You have a great product (and had a great name which made sense)! Why the need for a new name, with substandard design and poor branding.

Posted by bebek resimleri on January 18, 2009 at 05:36 AM PST #

You have a great product (and had a great name which made sense)! Why the need for a new name, with substandard design and poor branding.

Posted by estetik on January 18, 2009 at 05:36 AM PST #

thank you admin.

Posted by araba resimleri on January 18, 2009 at 05:38 AM PST #

You have a great product (and had a great name which made sense)! Why the need for a new name, with substandard design and poor branding.

Posted by diyet on January 18, 2009 at 05:39 AM PST #

You have a great product (and had a great name which made sense)! Why the need for a new name, with substandard design and poor branding.

Posted by güzeller on January 18, 2009 at 05:39 AM PST #

You have a great product (and had a great name which made sense)! Why the need for a new name, with substandard design and poor branding.

Posted by liseli on January 18, 2009 at 05:45 AM PST #

Post a Comment:
Comments are closed for this entry.
About

atul

Search

Archives
« September 2015
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
  
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
   
       
Today