Web 2.0 - the rest of the story

If you saw this story in today's SF Chronicle, or in Linda Skrocki's blog, you will have seen the problems DIGG got into when it tried to censor something its users didn't want censored. Without getting into the discussion of DRM (digital rights management) and whether you agree with the recording industry being able to protect their content (a TOTALLY different topic, with lots of passionate opinions), I think this story shows something broader about Web 2.0 - what do you do when (or if) the crowd is not "right" or "wise"?

This has come up elsewhere in discussions of MediaWiki and how anyone can put erroneous information out there, and until now I had always bought the argument that the erroneous information would get quickly corrected by "the crowd" and therefore little harm done. But this incident points out, what if alot of people want to put out information "we" (whoever "we" are) don't want them to? You remove one reference, they add another. What if there are more of "them" then there are of us?

I guess it's just an extension of free speech, but the implications are vast. Because of the reach of the internet, a determined bunch of people can reach alot of folks with information we may not want them to have - such as how to build IEDs to blow up more people? (Probably already out there somewhere, but hopefully not easily found today?)

This free, unfettered access to the digital world may have some very mixed blessings... 

 

Comments:

Hi Peter, I don't want to over simplify this, but it seems to me, it's not as bad as it seems. Web (n) only amplifies what is already there. And I'm with TBL, being optimistic, believe that there are more good things people want to do with web that the bad things. It's like with electricity, machinery, radio or anything else. Uses and abuses. It is also true that web opens new markets and old markets need to adapt. Businesses need to be smart (or influential) enough to innovate, or protect them selves; or close the shop and go somewhere else. If you have a community, you set the rules. If the community does not like them, you can adapt, or - close the shop. (Online) businesses and communities may need more powerful tools to protect themselves. Trust circles could be one. Not being naive (as in the issue with the HD-DVD code) is another.

Posted by Jiri Kopsa on May 03, 2007 at 04:26 PM PDT #

Post a Comment:
  • HTML Syntax: NOT allowed
About

pdiamond

Search

Categories
Archives
« April 2014
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
  
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
   
       
Today