A couple of nice C++0x readings

Hi!

the last days I was going through some introductory C++0x material and noticed that this nice article by Bjarne Stroustrup isn't linked in some of the first places you look when searching the web (eg, Wikipedia):

http://www.research.att.com/~bs/what-is-2009.pdf

and also, of course:

http://www2.research.att.com/~bs/C++0xFAQ.html

In general, I suggest to select in this growing literature only very recent (say, only 2009) papers and documentation, because until very recently the shape of the new C++ was still remarkably in flux, see, for example, the removal of Concepts.

Soon for more...

Comments:

Paolo, Yes, it's a very good point about learning C++0x from very recent materials. I found myself in a trap of mixing let's say TR1 and C++0x and not being able to cope with difference of results I get with various compilers. Eventually, complaining too much :-)

Posted by Mateusz Loskot on February 05, 2010 at 08:00 AM CET #

Post a Comment:
  • HTML Syntax: NOT allowed
About

C++ enthusiasts only, please! ;)

Search

Categories
Archives
« April 2014
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
  
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
   
       
Today