PeopleSoft HRMS 8.9 Self-Service Benchmark on M3000 & T5120 Servers

Sun published the PeopleSoft HRMS 8.9 Self-Service benchmark results today. The benchmark was conducted on 3 x Sun SPARC Enterprise M3000 and 1 x Sun SPARC Enterprise T5120 servers. Click on the following link for the full report with the benchmark results.

PeopleSoft HRMS 8.9 SELF-SERVICE Using ORACLE on Sun SPARC Enterprise M3000 and Enterprise T5120 Servers

Admittedly it is Sun's first PeopleSoft benchmark after a hiatus of over five years. However I am glad that we came up with a very nice cost effective solution in our comeback effort to the PeopleSoft applications' benchmarking.

Some of the notes and highlights from this competitive benchmark are as follows.

  • The benchmark measured the average search and save transaction response times at a peak load of 4,000 concurrent users.

  • 4,000 users is the limitation of the benchmark kit. All vendors using this benchmark kit are bound to this limitation . Hence it is easy to compare the performance as the throughput achieved by each vendor will be the same. In comparing the benchmark results from workloads like these, lower average [transaction response times, CPU, memory utilizations] and the hardware in use (lesser the better), usually indicate better performance.

  • IBM and Sun are the only vendors who published benchmark results with PeopleSoft HRMS 8.9 Self-Service benchmark kit.

  • Sun's benchmark results are superior relative to IBM's best published result on a combination of z990 2084-C24 and eServer pSeries p690 servers. While I leave the price comparisons to the reader1, I'd like to show the performance numbers extracted from the benchmark reports published by Sun and IBM. All the following data/information is available in the benchmark reports. Feel free to draw your own conclusions.

    Average Transaction Response Times

    Vendor Single User
    Search (sec)
    4,000 Users
    Search (sec)
    Single User
    Save (sec)
    4,000 Users
    Save (sec)
    Sun 0.78 0.77 0.71 0.74
    IBM 0.78 1.35 0.65 1.01

    Average CPU Utilizations

    Vendor Web Server
    CPU%
    App Server1
    CPU%
    App Server2
    CPU%
    DB Server
    CPU%
    Sun 23.10 66.92 67.85 27.45
    IBM 45.81 59.70 N/A 40.66

    Average Memory Utilizations

    Vendor Web Server
    GB
    App Server1
    GB
    App Server2
    GB
    DB Server
    GB
    Sun 4.15 3.67 3.72 5.54
    IBM 5.00 15.70 N/A 0.3 (Huh!?)

    Hardware Configuration

    Vendor: Sun Microsystems

    Topology Diagram

    topology



    Tier Server
    Model
    Server
    Count
    Processor Processor
    Speed
    Processor
    Count
    #Cores per
    Processor
    Memory
    Web T5120 1 UltraSPARC-T2 1.2 GHz 1 4 8 GB
    App M3000 2 SPARC64-VII 2.52 GHz 1 4 8 GB
    DB M3000 1 SPARC64-VII 2.52 GHz 1 4 8 GB

    2 x Sun Storage J4200 arrays were used to host the database. Total disk space: ~1.34 Terabytes. Consumed only 120 GB disk space -- 115 GB for data on one array; and 5 GB for redo logs on the other array.


    Vendor: IBM

    Tier Server
    Model
    Server
    Count
    Processor Processor
    Speed
    Processor
    Count
    #Cores per
    Processor
    Memory
    Web p690 (7040-681) 1 POWER4 1.9 GHz 4 NA (?) 12 GB
    App p690 (7040-681) 1 POWER4 1.9 GHz 12 NA (?) 32 GB
    DB zSeries 990, model 2084-C24 1 z990 Gen1 ??? 6 NA (?) 32 GB

    1 x IBM TotalStorage DS8300 Enterprise Storage Server, 2107-922 ws used to host the database. Total disk space: ~9 Terabytes.

  • The combination of Sun SPARC Enterprise M3000 and T5120 servers consumed 1030 Watts on the average in a 7RU space in achieving 4,000 concurrent users. That is, in the case of similarly configured workloads, M3000/T5120 support 3.88 users per watt of the power consumed; and 571 users per rack unit.

Just like our prior Siebel and Oracle E-Business Suite Payroll 11i benchmarks, Sun collaborated with Oracle Corporation in executing this benchmark. And we sincerely thank our peers at Oracle Corporation for all their help and support over the past few months in executing this benchmark.

___________

I'm planning to post some of the tuning tips to run PeopleSoft optimally on Solaris 10. Stay tuned ..

1: It is relatively hard to obtain IBM's server list prices. On the other hand, it is very easy to find the list prices of Sun servers' from http://store.sun.com
Comments:

Dude...good job.....those topology diagrams are nifty - How did you create them ?

Posted by Khader on February 17, 2009 at 08:06 AM PST #

StarOffice, Khader

Posted by Giri Mandalika on February 17, 2009 at 08:29 AM PST #

IBM server with Power4 is not something people want to compare with Sun latest servers.
It might be better if you also give estimation what kind of Power6 server is approximately equal to the Power4 server used in the benchmark.

Posted by Adrianus B. Kurnadi on March 22, 2009 at 02:47 PM PDT #

perfect information , many thanks

Posted by Kapuzenpullover on September 26, 2009 at 08:23 PM PDT #

Great post. Do you know why they used the T5120 for the web server and not the m3000?

Posted by Tim Guinn on January 14, 2010 at 06:07 AM PST #

[Tim Guinn] Do you know why they used the T5120 for the web server and not the m3000?
--

Couple of reasons, Tim - (1) web server is a light-weight multi-threaded java process that makes any CMT box a better fit to deploy the application on, and (2) we want to have a mix of different server offerings in the benchmark setup.

The end result is not going to be different though, even if we put an M3000 in place of the T5120.

Posted by Giri Mandalika on January 14, 2010 at 07:11 AM PST #

Hello and thanks for the post.

Do you know why they didn't use T5120 for the application server? Aren't they recommended for WebLogic?

Thank you.

Posted by Francisco on April 07, 2010 at 01:16 AM PDT #

Post a Comment:
  • HTML Syntax: NOT allowed
About

Benchmark announcements, HOW-TOs, Tips and Troubleshooting

Search

Archives
« April 2014
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
  
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
   
       
Today