The Fly, the Ant, the Spider, the Butterfly, and the Puzzled Poet.

or The Paranoid, the Philosopher, the Cartesianist, the Poet, and the Stupid Fly.

Yesterday I was browsing on the Internet when a page banner caught my eye. The banner featured a beautiful picture of four insects. A fly, an ant, a spider and a beautifully colored butterfly. Next to each picture was a checkbox. And the question was:

Which does not belong to the group?

I was hooked. For indeed, which doesn't belong to the group? Having the soul of a poet, I was stricken by the beauty of the colorful butterfly. Surely, such a beautiful, fragile, and colorful insect couldn't possibly belong to the same group as the dull grey-brown nasty beasts pictured on the same page?

The butterfly it is! said I.

But as I was ready to click on the butterfly checkbox, another thought occurred to me. I am a great fan of Woody Allen. Which insect would Woody Allen choose? The ant of course. I am no great philosopher, but philosophy is something I do feel interested in. The ant reminded me of Antz. And there's a great philosophic difference between the ant and the other three insects. The ant is the only one of the four that lives in colony - and which is not free to make an individual life. The ant would die without the colony. Surely such a big philosophic difference would take the ant apart from all the three other species on this page?

The ant it is! said I.

But as I was ready to click on the ant checkbox, I had another idea. Being an IT engineer, I also have a cartesian mind. The spider bothered me. For the spider has eight legs. The spider belongs to a whole different order: the arachnids. The spider was the greatest predator on this page. Surely, cartesianally, the spider is the one that didn't belong with the others. Left alone with the three others, and free to roam from the picture that imprisoned it, the spider would shortly spring on the other three, poison them, tie them, eat them, digest them, until only the spider would remain. Surely this sets the spider far apart from the other three?

The spider it is! said I.

But once again, I hesitated. What was the stupid fly doing there? Was I being paranoid? So far the fly was the only one for which I hadn't figured a single reason as to why it wouldn't belong to the group. I had in turn half decided for each of the other three, but not for the fly. Was that what made the fly different from the other three? That it was the only one that couldn't not belong? Wasn't that the greatest difference of all? Wasn't that the expected answer?

Should I choose the stupid fly? I wondered...

Well I must admit, I am still puzzled. Maybe this is in fact another instance of a Wicked Problem.
What would have been your take?


Brilliant! By choosing all four, you have effectively outwitted the ad, rendering it as ineffective as a virtual mosquito bite! Now if only we could stop people from clicking on the 'Free iPod' banners!

Posted by j m v on March 14, 2006 at 05:34 PM CET #

Hmm, they all belong to the group because each has a good reason not to ?

Posted by Danny Coward on May 12, 2006 at 12:41 PM CEST #

Well, I like the idea ;-)

Posted by Daniel Fuchs on May 15, 2006 at 04:39 AM CEST #

It may be true that all the animals on that ad may belong to the same group, but I believe spiders (arachnids) are a whole different species than the rest of the insects shown, perhaps becuause of the number of legs on each? :-)

Posted by hggs on August 05, 2006 at 05:50 PM CEST #

That's one of the hypothesis of course - but since all of them have a reason not to belong, then can there be a unique truth? ;-)

Posted by daniel on August 08, 2006 at 05:12 AM CEST #

Well Let's think for a moment... The Ant Bites, The Fly Bites, The Spider Bites, Soooo what is left??? The Butterfly :)

Posted by JR on August 12, 2006 at 12:17 AM CEST #

hi you r stupid

Posted by guest on November 01, 2007 at 06:31 PM CET #

y do u guys like that kinda stupid stuff?

Posted by guest on November 01, 2007 at 06:32 PM CET #

Post a Comment:
Comments are closed for this entry.

Daniel Fuchs blogs on Scene Builder, JMX, SNMP, Java, etc...

The views expressed on this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Oracle.


« July 2016