Tuesday May 24, 2011
Thursday Sep 25, 2008
By daniel on Sep 25, 2008
Tuesday Apr 01, 2008
Monday Feb 25, 2008
Thursday Oct 25, 2007
Wednesday Jun 20, 2007
By daniel on Jun 20, 2007
Here I am at home, seating in my sofa, with my MacBook on my knees, and staring fixedly at my latest blog entry on how to read a jar manifest file programmatically, being displayed on finance.google.com. No I'm not joking! The proof is here (second entry under "Blog Posts": on the right side):[Read More]
Thursday Dec 07, 2006
By daniel on Dec 07, 2006
Monday Oct 23, 2006
Friday Jul 21, 2006
By daniel on Jul 21, 2006
I promise, next time I'll blog about Java. I'm currently deep in the writing of an advanced JMX example and you'll hear about it soon...[Read More]
Friday Jun 30, 2006
By daniel on Jun 30, 2006
Tuesday Apr 04, 2006
Saturday Jan 28, 2006
By daniel on Jan 28, 2006
Yesterday I was browsing on the Internet when a page banner caught my eye. The banner featured a beautiful picture of four insects. A fly, an ant, a spider and a beautifully colored butterfly. Next to each picture was a checkbox. And the question was:
Which does not belong to the group?
I was hooked. For indeed, which doesn't belong to the group? Having the soul of a poet, I was stricken by the beauty of the colorful butterfly. Surely, such a beautiful, fragile, and colorful insect couldn't possibly belong to the same group as the dull grey-brown nasty beasts pictured on the same page?
The butterfly it is! said I.
But as I was ready to click on the butterfly checkbox, another thought occurred to me. I am a great fan of Woody Allen. Which insect would Woody Allen choose? The ant of course. I am no great philosopher, but philosophy is something I do feel interested in. The ant reminded me of Antz. And there's a great philosophic difference between the ant and the other three insects. The ant is the only one of the four that lives in colony - and which is not free to make an individual life. The ant would die without the colony. Surely such a big philosophic difference would take the ant apart from all the three other species on this page?
The ant it is! said I.
But as I was ready to click on the ant checkbox, I had another idea. Being an IT engineer, I also have a cartesian mind. The spider bothered me. For the spider has eight legs. The spider belongs to a whole different order: the arachnids. The spider was the greatest predator on this page. Surely, cartesianally, the spider is the one that didn't belong with the others. Left alone with the three others, and free to roam from the picture that imprisoned it, the spider would shortly spring on the other three, poison them, tie them, eat them, digest them, until only the spider would remain. Surely this sets the spider far apart from the other three?
The spider it is! said I.
But once again, I hesitated. What was the stupid fly doing there? Was I being paranoid? So far the fly was the only one for which I hadn't figured a single reason as to why it wouldn't belong to the group. I had in turn half decided for each of the other three, but not for the fly. Was that what made the fly different from the other three? That it was the only one that couldn't not belong? Wasn't that the greatest difference of all? Wasn't that the expected answer?
Should I choose the stupid fly? I wondered...
Well I must admit, I am still puzzled. Maybe this is in fact another instance of a Wicked Problem.
What would have been your take?
Tuesday Jan 17, 2006
By daniel on Jan 17, 2006
John Updike is quoted as saying Nobody else writes like Daniel Fuchs. I think of him as a natural – a poet who never had to strain after a poetic effect, .... Well, obviously John Updike is not talking about me, as you may already have gathered if you've been reading this blog.
I grew up in the south of France - in a little town of around 20,000 inhabitants - where the name Fuchs (pronounced Foox) was uncommon enough so that 1) nobody who discovered how to spell it would ever be able to pronounce it correctly afterwards, and 2) nobody who knew how to pronounce it was ever able to spell it correctly. At that time, it was mostly a lot of fun.
Then I learned that having an unspeakable - or unspellable name, depending on which form written, or spoken, was first known by your interlocutor, was not always an advantage. For instance it can prove to be quite a hassle when dealing with administrations - who will insist on calling you by squirrel noises, and deny vehemently that your name is already registered in their database.
But when you later discover what John Updike had to say about you... ;-)))
Daniel Fuchs blogs on Scene Builder, JMX, SNMP, Java, etc...
The views expressed on this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Oracle.
- Jerome has written a nice article on integrating SceneBuilder with several IDEs
- A nice article on NetBeans 7.2 and JavaFX SceneBuilder
- Connecting SceneBuilder edited FXML to Java code
- Welcome to blogs.oracle.com
- Project OpenDMK has moved to the new java.net infrastructure.
- The Mystery Of Multiple MBeanServers
- Saved by ZFS while fighting with Firefox 3 configuration
- Mercurial: listing files modified in incoming changesets, and guessing conflicts...
- Java 5, premain, RMI Connectors, Single Port, SSL, and Firewall.
- OpenDS 1.0 is Released: A Java Open Source LDAP Server with JMX and SNMP monitoring
- Java for SysAdmins
- My Posts on SDN
- Need professional support?
- Need some training?
- Open Source & Sun
- Planet JDK
- Project OpenDMK
- Questions about JMX?
- Questions about SNMP?
- The Aquarium
- The Java Tutorials' Blog
- VisualVM (JMX Inside)
- What Is JMX
- Sun Eco Center
- JMX Home Page
- Java DMK (SNMP inside!)
- NetBeans Home Page