Monday Sep 10, 2007

What's Wrong With This Picture? (Burning Sensations)

Loren Mack is a design architect in xDesign who creates strategic and tactical designs for the Service Oriented Architecture/Business Integration group at Sun.

Is someone burning, or is it just me?

Some time ago I realized that my shower fixture was really out of date. I came to this realization just moments after one of my shower knobs broke off in my hand. Actually, it was probably the moment after the valve shot from the pipe, hit me in the leg (!!!), and sprayed really HOT water at me non-stop. It was like one of those movies where they’re torturing the prisoners in their cell by spraying them with a fire hose, only it was my own home and I was being tortured by my 1950’s bathroom.

Not a problem – close the main valve, have a quick dip in a waist-high vat of Aloe-Vera (which I keep handy for just such emergencies), and then off to the hardware store to find a new fixture.

Modern Design Meets "Huh?" ...

While perusing the many styles at my local store, I came across one that had me scratching my head.

At first glance I was already remodeling my bathroom to work around this beauty. It was shiny, sleek, and smooth. But then I really looked at it. What the...? Which way is "on"? I liked the "anti-scald" feature because I certainly couldn't figure out how to get "warm". The design was so dangerous that they actually had to engineer in safety measures?

There were other problems as well...

  • The knobs (of which there are two) would be slippery when wet and soapy - hard to manipulate
  • There was no indication which knob is "flow" and which one is "temperature"
  • There was no way to determine which direction to move the knobs
  • Whatever the smaller knob did would be hard to do in small increments as the leverage afforded is minimal
  • And like any other single-control shower knob, if you accidentally bumped it during a soap frenzy, there's no telling if you'll go to scalding hot, icy-cold, or just "off"

In this situation, the design is unfamiliar and despite the neat-o looks, it would be hard to get your shower the right temperature at the right rate of flow. Also, if I know myself at all I'd be cleaning it after each use as the finish would immediately show water spots. Sleek, smooth, shiny, and poorly designed.

I kept looking and found several others, not nearly as bewildering, but with similar problems. Some were nice looking, but hard to manipulate. Others, you needed a printed instruction sheet to figure out. At that point I decided the "old-skool" designs were still the most usable.

Older Fixtures Make for Better Showers

This one wasn't as snazzy looking, but it solved a number of the problems with the previous one.

  • You would be able to grip the knobs with soapy hands
  • You could tell which was hot and cold (by placement as well as the letters on each)
  • There was no mystery about how to activate the shower-head.
  • No "anti-scald" feature required for normal use

And... probably the best bit here was the fact it would fit with my vintage bathroom without having to completely remodel it. Not that I'm lazy, mind you, but the time and expense would keep me from being able to shower regularly -- which was what I was trying to do in the first place!

Tuesday Sep 04, 2007

What's Wrong With This Picture? (Lockdown)

Loren Mack is a design architect in xDesign who creates strategic and tactical designs for the Service Oriented Architecture/Business Integration group at Sun.

Design isn't all about aesthetics, but aesthetics certainly make a difference. To me, design is part thought process, part style, and part usability; thinking about the problem you intend to solve, creating your solution with style and verve, and then making sure it works well for its intended task and audience. However, much too often in my everyday life I come across something that makes me growl — especially when that something encourages me to make a stupid mistake. Right about then the laugh-track goes off in my head, and I feel a bit like Jerry Lewis, only I'm not intending to do something goofy.

The Pull-Me, Pull-You Problem

I once locked myself in a skyway running between the second floors of two buildings in Des Moines, IA. Because of its cold winters, downtown Des Moines has connecting glass hallways that allow you to travel from building to building without actually leaving an enclosed space. It's great because it can be bloody cold outside that time of year. So how did I manage such a feat?

Well, the picture on the left shows a doorway similar to the one that confused me. And, while it was my error that caused the problem, it was the design that really encouraged it: door handles like these say "Pull-Me" to the person approaching the door. If you watch 100 people approach this door, I'll bet you 50 $imoleans they all try to pull the door toward them.

It turns out though, that the doorway had handles like these on both sides, so folks on either side of the door will likely end up pulling on the handle, which is exactly what I did.

The problem occurs when the door only opens one way. In this case, the "push" side (shown right) also has the "Pull-Me" handle, and in my case, so did the skyway. I pulled open the door at one end of the skyway, to enter, and then pulled (in vain) on the other side to get into the next building.

I then went back and pulled the handles on the door through I had just entered, and sure enough the door didn't open. I assumed that, since it was late in the day, the doors had locked between buildings. I was trapped like an ant in an ant-farm.

Eventually, someone else came through the door on the opposite side of the skyway, and I made my escape. Only then did it occur to me to try again and that's when I figured out the doors only opened into the buildings. I could've pulled on those handles all day and never gotten the doors open. Thank goodness it was a weekday, and I wasn't the only person working late.

The point of my story is the same as the story Don Norman used in 1988 to first describe what "affordances" are: the perceived and actual uses of a thing. In my example above, a C-shaped door handle around waist height indicated a grasp/pull action. This design is fine for two-way doors, but one-way doors could better indicate their functional direction by having a handle on one side, and a push-plate on the other. Norman suggests that "a good conceptual model allows us to predict the effects of our actions." So, in the absence of an affordance, at least put the word "Push" on the correct side for all skyway doors in Des Moines.


xDesign is a software user experience design group at Sun.
Follow us on Twitter : Flickr : Blog (see feeds below)


« July 2016