The multi-core is complex meme (but it's not)
By Darryl Gove on Oct 30, 2008
The article describes how multi-core computing is hard. Here's a snippet of it:
"For exciting, also read 'complicated'; this presents huge programming challenges as we have to address the immensely complex interplay between multiple processors (think of a juggler riding a unicycle on a high wire, and you're starting to get the idea)."
Now, I just happened to see this particular article, but there's plenty of other places where the same meme appears. And yes, writing a multi-threaded application can be very complex, but probably only if you do it badly I mean just how complex is:
#pragma omp parallel for
Ok, so it's not fair comparing using OpenMP to parallelise a loop with writing some convoluted juggler riding unicycle application, but let's take a look at the example he uses:
"Handwriting recognition systems, for example, work by either identifying pen movement, or by recognising the written image itself. Currently, each approach works, but each has certain drawbacks that hinder adoption as a serious interface.
Now, with a different processor focusing on each recognition approach, learning our handwriting style and combining results, multi-core PCs will dramatically increase the accuracy of handwriting recognition."
This sounds like a good example (better than the old examples of using a virus scanner on one core whilst you worked on the other), but to me it implies two independent tasks. Or two independent threads. Yes, having a multicore chip means that the two tasks can execute in parallel, but assuming a sufficiently fast single core processor we could use the same approach.
So yes, to get the best from multi-core, you need to use multi-threaded programming (or multi-process, or virtualisation, or consolidation, but that's not the current discussion). But multi-threaded programming, whilst it can be tricky, is pretty well understood, and more importantly, for quite a large range of codes easy to do using OpenMP.
So I'm going to put it the other way around. It's easy to find parallelism in today's environment, from the desktop, through gaming, or numeric codes. There's abundant examples of where many threads are simultaneously active. Where it gets really exciting (for exciting read "fun") is if you start looking at using CMT processors to parallelise things that previously were not practical to run with multiple threads.