To DogPile or to Google?

 

 What the dog looks like

One of the questions I've been pondering is if it's better to use an aggregated search engine like DogPile or to just use Google or ask.com. I'm finding myself going back and forth, maybe just to do a comparison between the results. One nice thing with dogpile is you don't see all the ads in your face on the results page. Now if they aggregated all the ad money from google, MSN.search, Ask.com, and Yahoo, they'd have an amazing business model. I wonder why more folks don't use Dogpile. Or maybe folks do, but its more invisibly.

Comments:

Dogpile is a good search engine allowing your query to be search in other search engines such as google, yahoo, etc. However, there are features of google that doesn't apply in dogpile. Take for example the command "define:" or "~" use in google. For me, google is still the "unmatch search engine". Why do i say so? try reading "Google Hacks".

Posted by caspe on September 08, 2007 at 02:47 AM PDT #

Post a Comment:
  • HTML Syntax: NOT allowed
About

cjsasaki

Search

Categories
Archives
« April 2014
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
  
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
   
       
Today
Bookmarks
Blogroll

No bookmarks in folder