Thursday Mar 06, 2014

Tyrus 1.5

New version of Tyrus was released today, so let’s do a quick summary of what is new compared to previous version and so on.

What’s new?

Maven archetype was (finally) added, so if you want to generate simple application, test it and maybe start playing with the code and modifying it to something more complex, you can. All you need is maven and little space on your hard drive. Then you can execute following command:

1
2
3
4
mvn archetype:generate -DarchetypeArtifactId=tyrus-archetype-echo \
-DarchetypeGroupId=org.glassfish.tyrus.archetypes -DinteractiveMode=false \
-DgroupId=com.example -DartifactId=echo -Dpackage=com.example \
-DarchetypeVersion=1.5

and the project should be created.

What’s fixed?

  • Close reason for dropped connection is now 1006, as it should be.
  • Standalone Server is not leaking daemon threads any more.
  • Java SE 8 runtime issues.
  • “Host” header parsing issue which caused failed handshakes when using IPv6 localhost address ([::1]).
  •  Internal InputStream implementation now correctly returns ‘-1′ to InputStream#read() only when end of input is reached. Thanks Raghu for contributing the fix!

Java SE 8 related issue is worth a short explanation, since the change introduced by this fix goes beyond SE 8. Original problem was about some bug in Java SE 7 which somehow corrected Tyrus behaviour, so it was not noticed by our tests – bridge methods are not returned from Class.getMethods() call there. This was fixed in Java SE 8 and it caused some troubles in Tyrus implementation, because we just did not expect them to be returned.

The other part of this issue was correcting Tyrus in terms of handling inherited methods. JSR 356 describes how these should be handled in little bit cryptic way, but it basically states that annotations are not inherited, which is already defined in Java language specification. Unfortunately, Tyrus prior this version was considering annotated methods (@OnOpen, @OnMessage, …) only from the very same class as the registered one, so inherited methods were always ignored. This is now changed, so you can have something like:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
public class BaseEndpoint {
@OnOpen
public void onOpen(Session session) throws IOException {
// do something.
}
}
@ServerEndpoint("/echo")
public class EchoEndpoint extends BaseEndpoint {
@OnMessage
public void echo(Session session, String message) throws IOException {
// do something else.
}
}

both methods – onOpen and onMessage will be considered as part of EchoEndpoint class. Please note that annotations are still not inherited, so if you for example declare BaseEndpoint class as abstract with onOpen method annotated with @OnOpen, overriding method won’t be called by Tyrus unless you “re-add” @OnOpen annotation to new method:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
public abstract class BaseEndpoint {
public abstract void onOpen(Session session) throws IOException;
}
@ServerEndpoint("/echo")
public class EchoEndpoint extends BaseEndpoint {
@OnOpen // this has to be here!
@Override
public void onOpen(Session session) throws IOException {
// do something.
}
}

Feel free to ask here or send us a note to users@tyrus.java.net if you have any questions related to this release or anything related to our WebSocket implementation.

Links

Wednesday Feb 12, 2014

Oracle Toplink team is hiring!

Oracle Toplink team is looking for Java Developers! If you want to became part of the team which is working on Toplink, EclipseLink, JAX-B, JAX-WS and related projects and products, this is the time to update your CV and share it with us. This job position is based in Prague, Czech Republic.

Formal job offer can be found on linked.in.

If you are interested and have any questions, feel free to contact me directly via this blog or via pavel.bucek at oracle.com.

Friday Jan 24, 2014

Updating Tyrus in Glassfish

This article is inspired by similar one about Jersey and will provide similar information. Thanks to Michal for creating such comprehensive instructions.

Fortunately, Tyrus does not depend on HK2 so the task here is lot easier. To be absolutely honest, I did expect some issues with Grizzly dependency in Tyrus client, but changes are backwards compatible (applies to Tyrus 1.4), so you can update Tyrus to any version of released Glassfish very easily.

Which version of Tyrus am I using?

You can get this from tyrus-core.jar manifest:

1
2
$ unzip -p $GLASSFISH_HOME/glassfish/modules/tyrus-core.jar META-INF/MANIFEST.MF | grep Bundle-Version
Bundle-Version: 1.0.0

This means you are using Tyrus 1.0. I strongly recommend to upgrade. Latest version now is Tyrus 1.4 and the output will look like:

1
2
$ unzip -p $GLASSFISH_HOME/glassfish/modules/tyrus-core.jar META-INF/MANIFEST.MF | grep Bundle-Version
Bundle-Version: 1.4.0

Glassfish distributions

Table below contains overview of current Glassfish 4.x builds:

Glassfish version Download link Tyrus version
4.0 (Java EE 7 RI) [download] 1.0
4.0.1 b01 [download] 1.0
4.0.1 b02 [download] 1.2.1
4.0.1 b03 [download] 1.2.1
4.0.1 latest nightly [download] latest

Updating to Tyrus 1.4

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
$ rm $GLASSFISH_HOME/glassfish/modules/tyrus-*jar
$ unzip -j ./websocket-ri-archive-1.4.zip "websocket-ri-archive-1.4/lib/*" -d $GLASSFISH_HOME/glassfish/modules/
Archive:  ./websocket-ri-archive-1.4.zip
inflating: [path]/modules/tyrus-client-1.4.jar
inflating: [path]/modules/tyrus-container-glassfish-cdi-1.4.jar
inflating: [path]/modules/tyrus-container-grizzly-client-1.4.jar
inflating: [path]/modules/tyrus-container-servlet-1.4.jar
inflating: [path]/modules/tyrus-core-1.4.jar
inflating: [path]/modules/tyrus-server-1.4.jar
inflating: [path]/modules/tyrus-spi-1.4.jar

And that’s it. Remember to restart Glassfish instance after replacing Tyrus jar files.

Note

As of now (1/24/2013) latest nightly build of Glassfish contains Tyrus 1.3.3. Next nightly should contain latest Tyrus release – version 1.4.

Links

Thursday Jan 16, 2014

Tyrus 1.4

I’m pleased to announce that Tyrus 1.4 was released today. It contains all features mentioned recently on my blog: Extensions support (including compression extensions implementation), shared client container and many other improvements and bug fixes. Binaries will be available on maven central repository soon and Tyrus 1.4 will be integrated into Glassfish trunk.

As always, feel free to contribute! You can file an enhancement or a bug or just ask if there is something unclear in the documentation.

Release notes

Bugs

  • [TYRUS-136] – org.glassfish.tyrus.server.Server does not stop correctly when DeploymentException is thrown
  • [TYRUS-263] – SSL via HTTP PROXY – wss://echo.websocket.org Handshake error. “Response code was not 101: 200″
  • [TYRUS-269] – Parallel connection to ServerEndpoint with URI template mix up response to client instances …
  • [TYRUS-270] – The title of file README.html of Draw sample is mis-typed from “Draw Sample” to “Chat Sample”
  • [TYRUS-271] – “?null” is added to every request without query params
  • [TYRUS-272] – TyrusServerConfiguration incompatible with jetty’s jsr 356 implementation.
  • [TYRUS-273] – EJB component provider needs to provide method which will be invoked.
  • [TYRUS-275] – Tyrus client has bug causing limitation of # of open web sockets
  • [TYRUS-276] – Session accepts messages after idle timeout (@OnMessage is triggered)
  • [TYRUS-277] – session.setMaxIdleTimeout(0) does not reset/cancel the timeout
  • [TYRUS-280] – Extension parsed does not allow parameter without value
  • [TYRUS-281] – Client does CDI/EJB lookup
  • [TYRUS-282] – Session.setMaxIdleTimeout(..) does not work as expected for negative values
  • [TYRUS-288] – WebSocket connections are automatically closed after 30 idle seconds in standalone mode

Improvements

  • [TYRUS-56] – content root directory configuration in Server class for static content
  • [TYRUS-160] – Tyrus tests won’t compile with JDK 1.6
  • [TYRUS-183] – UTF8 validation logic should be separated from frame parsing
  • [TYRUS-265] – Improve GrizzlyWriter implementation
  • [TYRUS-266] – Support for WebSocket extensions
  • [TYRUS-268] – In-memory transport for testing / performance analysis

New Features

  • [TYRUS-193] – Support Tyrus with different transports
  • [TYRUS-283] – CompressionExtension (permessage-compression)
  • [TYRUS-286] – Shared client container improvement (stop when there is no open session)
  • [TYRUS-287] – Cannot create non-daemon threads with Tyrus server standalone mode

Tasks

  • [TYRUS-246] – Investigate and fix issues related to ServletTest#testWebSocketBroadcast
  • [TYRUS-264] – Client SPI

Wednesday Jan 08, 2014

WebSocket Extensions in Tyrus

There is always room for another experimental feature :-) This one is maybe little less experimental than broadcast support, but please implement presented APIs with one important fact in your mind – it can change any time.

What is WebSocket Extension?

You can think of WebSocket Extension as a filter, which processes all incoming and outgoing frames. Frame is the smallest unit in WebSocket protocol which can be transferred on the wire – it contains some some metadata (frame type, opcode, payload length, etc.) and of course payload itself.

 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-------+-+-------------+-------------------------------+
|F|R|R|R| opcode|M| Payload len |    Extended payload length    |
|I|S|S|S|  (4)  |A|     (7)     |             (16/64)           |
|N|V|V|V|       |S|             |   (if payload len==126/127)   |
| |1|2|3|       |K|             |                               |
+-+-+-+-+-------+-+-------------+ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - +
|     Extended payload length continued, if payload len == 127  |
+ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - +-------------------------------+
|                               |Masking-key, if MASK set to 1  |
+-------------------------------+-------------------------------+
| Masking-key (continued)       |          Payload Data         |
+-------------------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - +
:                     Payload Data continued ...                :
+ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - +
|                     Payload Data continued ...                |
+---------------------------------------------------------------+

Figure taken from RFC 6455

If you are interested about some more details related to WebSocket protocol specification, please see linked RFC document (RFC 6455).

What can be achieved by WebSocket Extension?

Almost everything. You can change every single bit of incoming or outgoing frame, including control frames (close, ping and pong). There are some RFC drafts trying to standardise extensions like per message compression (used to be per frame compression) and multiplexing extension (now expired).

Tyrus already has support for per message compression extension and exposes interfaces which allow users to write custom extensions with completely different functionality.

When should I consider implementing WebSocket Extensions?

This is maybe the most important question. WebSocket Extensions can do almost everything, but you should not use them for use cases achievable by other means. Why? Majority of WebSocket use cases are about communication with browsers and javascript client cannot really influence which exception is going to be used. Browser must support your particular extension (by default or it can be enabled by some custom module).

You can easily use custom extension when using Tyrus java client, so if there is no browser interaction in your application, it should be easier to distribute your extensions to involved parties and you might lift the threshold when deciding whether something will be done by extension or by application logic.

Java API for WebSocket and Extensions

API currently contains following extension representation (javadoc removed):

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
public interface Extension {
String getName();
List getParameters();
interface Parameter {
String getName();
String getValue();
}
}

and the specification (JSR 356) limits extension definition only for handshake purposes. To sum that up, users can only declare Extension with static parameters (no chance to set parameters based on request extension parameters) and that’s it. These extensions don’t have any processing part, so the work must be done somewhere else. As you might already suspect, this is not ideal state. Usability of extensions specified like this is very limited, it is basically just a marker class which has some influence on handshake headers. You can get list of negotiated extensions in the runtime (Session.getNegotiatedExtensions()) but there is no way how you could access frame fields other than payload itself.

Proposed Extension API

I have to repeat warning already presented at the start of this blog post – anything mentioned below might be changed without notice. There are some TODO items which will most likely require some modification of presented API, not to mention that RFC drafts of WebSocket Extensions are not final yet. There might be even bigger modification needed – for example, multiplexing draft specifies different frame representation, use of RSV bits is not standardised etc. So please take following as a usable proof of concept and feel free to use them in agile projects.

Firstly, we need to create frame representation.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
public class Frame {
public boolean isFin() { .. }
public boolean isRsv1() { .. }
public boolean isRsv2() { .. }
public boolean isRsv3() { .. }
public boolean isMask() { .. }
public byte getOpcode() { .. }
public long getPayloadLength() { .. }
public int getMaskingKey() { .. }
public byte[] getPayloadData() { .. }
public boolean isControlFrame() { .. }
public static Builder builder() { .. }
public static Builder builder(Frame frame) { .. }
public final static class Builder {
public Builder() { .. }
public Builder(Frame frame) { .. }
public Frame build() { .. }
public Builder fin(boolean fin) { .. }
public Builder rsv1(boolean rsv1) { .. }
public Builder rsv2(boolean rsv2) { .. }
public Builder rsv3(boolean rsv3) { .. }
public Builder mask(boolean mask) { .. }
public Builder opcode(byte opcode) { .. }
public Builder payloadLength(long payloadLength) { .. }
public Builder maskingKey(int maskingKey) { .. }
public Builder payloadData(byte[] payloadData) { .. }
}
}

This is pretty much straightforward copy of frame definition mentioned earlier. Frame is designed as immutable, so you cannot change it in any way. One method might be recognised as mutable – getPayloadData() – returns modifiable byte array, but it is always new copy, so the original frame instance remains intact. There is also a Frame.Builder for constructing new Frame instances, notice it can copy existing frame, so creating a new frame with let’s say RSV1 bit set to “1″ is as easy as:

1
Frame newFrame = Frame.builder(originalFrame).rsv1(true).build();

Note that there is only one convenience method: isControlFrame. Other information about frame type etc needs to be evaluated directly from opcode, simply because there might not be enough information to get the correct outcome or the information itself would not be very useful. For example: opcode 0×00 means continuation frame, but you don’t have any chance to get the information about actual type (text or binary) without intercepting data from previous frames. Consider Frame class as as raw as possible representation.isControlFrame can be also gathered from opcode, but it is at least always deterministic and it will be used by most of extension implementations. It is not usual to modify control frames as it might end with half closed connections or unanswered ping messages.

New Extension representation needs to be able to handle extension parameter negotiation and actual processing of incoming and outgoing frames. It also should be compatible with existing javax.websocket.Extension class, since we wan’t to re-use existing registration API and be able to return new extension instance included in response fromSession.getNegotiatedExtensions():List<Extension> call. Consider following:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
public interface ExtendedExtension extends Extension {
Frame processIncoming(ExtensionContext context, Frame frame);
Frame processOutgoing(ExtensionContext context, Frame frame);
List onExtensionNegotiation(ExtensionContext context, List requestedParameters);
void onHandshakeResponse(ExtensionContext context, List responseParameters);
void destroy(ExtensionContext context);
interface ExtensionContext {
Map<String, Object> getProperties();
}
}

ExtendedExtension is capable of processing frames and influence parameter values during the handshake. Extension is used on both client and server side and since the negotiation is only place where this fact applies, we needed to somehow differentiate these sides. On server side, only onExtensionNegotiation(..) method is invoked and client side hasonHandshakeResponse(..). Server side method is a must, client side could be somehow solved by implementing ClientEndpointConfig.Configurator#afterResponse(..) or calling Session.getNegotiatedExtenions(), but it won’t be as easy to get this information back to extension instance and even if it was, it won’t be very elegant. Also, you might suggest replacing processIncoming and processOutgoing methods by just oneprocess(Frame) method. That is also possible, but then you might have to assume current direction from frame instance or somehow from ExtenionContext, which is generally not a bad idea, but it resulted it slightly less readable code.

Last but not least is ExtensionContext itself and related lifecycle method. OriginalExtension from javax.websocket is singleton and ExtendedExtension must obey this fact. But it does not meet some requirements we stated previously, like per connection parameter negotiation and of course processing itself will most likely have some connection state. Lifecycle of ExtensionContext is defined as follows: ExtensionContextinstance is created right before onExtensionNegotiation (server side) oronHandshakeResponse (client side) and destroyed after destroy method invocation. Obviously, processIncoming or processOutgoing cannot be called before ExtensionContextis created or after is destroyed. You can think of handshake related methods as @OnOpenand destroy as @OnClose.

For those more familiar with WebSocket protocol: process*(ExtensionContext, Frame) is always invoked with unmasked frame, you don’t need to care about it. On the other side, payload is as it was received from the wire, before any validation (UTF-8 check for text messages). This fact is particularly important when you are modifying text message content, you need to make sure it is properly encoded in relation to other messages, because encoding/decoding process is stateful – remainder after UTF-8 coding is used as input to coding process for next message. If you want just test this feature and save yourself some headaches, don’t modify text message content or try binary messages instead.

Code sample

Let’s say we want to create extension which will encrypt and decrypt first byte of every binary message. Assume we have a key (one byte) and our symmetrical cipher will be XOR. (Just for simplicity (a XOR key XOR key) = a, so encrypt() and decrypt() functions are the same).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
public class CryptoExtension implements ExtendedExtension {
@Override
public Frame processIncoming(ExtensionContext context, Frame frame) {
return lameCrypt(context, frame);
}
@Override
public Frame processOutgoing(ExtensionContext context, Frame frame) {
return lameCrypt(context, frame);
}
private Frame lameCrypt(ExtensionContext context, Frame frame) {
if(!frame.isControlFrame() && (frame.getOpcode() == 0x02)) {
final byte[] payloadData = frame.getPayloadData();
payloadData[0] ^= (Byte)(context.getProperties().get("key"));
return Frame.builder(frame).payloadData(payloadData).build();
} else {
return frame;
}
}
@Override
public List onExtensionNegotiation(ExtensionContext context,
List requestedParameters) {
init(context);
// no params.
return null;
}
@Override
public void onHandshakeResponse(ExtensionContext context,
List responseParameters) {
init(context);
}
private void init(ExtensionContext context) {
context.getProperties().put("key", (byte)0x55);
}
@Override
public void destroy(ExtensionContext context) {
context.getProperties().clear();
}
@Override
public String getName() {
return "lame-crypto-extension";
}
@Override
public List getParameters() {
// no params.
return null;
}
}

You can see that ExtendedExtension is slightly more complicated that original Extension so the implementation has to be also not as straightforward.. on the other hand, it does something. Sample code above shows possible simplification mentioned earlier (one process method will be enough), but please take this as just sample implementation. Real world case is usually more complicated.

Now when we have our CryptoExtension implemented, we want to use it. There is nothing new compared to standard WebSocket Java API, feel free to skip this part if you are already familiar with it. Only programmatic version will be demonstrated. It is possible to do it for annotated version as well, but it is little bit more complicated on the server side and I want to keep the code as compact as possible.

Client registration

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
ArrayList extensions = new ArrayList();
extensions.add(new CryptoExtension());
final ClientEndpointConfig clientConfiguration =
ClientEndpointConfig.Builder.create()
.extensions(extensions).build();
WebSocketContainer client = ContainerProvider.getWebSocketContainer();
final Session session = client.connectToServer(new Endpoint() {
@Override
public void onOpen(Session session, EndpointConfig config) {
// ...
}
}, clientConfiguration, URI.create(/* ... */));

Server registration:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
public class CryptoExtensionApplicationConfig implements ServerApplicationConfig {
@Override
public Set getEndpointConfigs(Set<Class<? extends Endpoint>> endpointClasses) {
Set endpointConfigs = new HashSet();
endpointConfigs.add(
ServerEndpointConfig.Builder.create(EchoEndpoint.class, "/echo")
.extensions(Arrays.asList(new CryptoExtension())).build()
);
return endpointConfigs;
}
@Override
public Set<Class<?>> getAnnotatedEndpointClasses(Set<Class<?>> scanned) {
// all scanned endpoints will be used.
return scanned;
}
}
public class EchoEndpoint extends Endpoint {
@Override
public void onOpen(Session session, EndpointConfig config) {
// ...
}
}

CryptoExtensionApplicationConfig will be found by servlets scanning mechanism and automatically used for application configuration, no need to add anything (or even have)web.xml.

Per Message Deflate Extension

The original goal of whole extension support was to implement Permessage extension as defined in draft-ietf-hybi-permessage-compression-15 and we were able to achieve that goal. Well, not completely, current implementation ignores parameters. But it seems like it does not matter much, it was tested with Chrome and it works fine. Also it passes newest version of Autobahn test suite, which includes tests for this extension.

  1. PerMessageDeflateExtension.java (compatible with draft-ietf-hybi-permessage-compression-15, autobahn test suite)
  2. XWebKitDeflateExtension.java (compatible with Chrome and Firefox – same as previous, just different extension name)
  3. PerMessageDeflateTest.java

TODO

There are some things which needs to be improved or specified to make this reliable and suitable for real world use. It might not seem as big feature, but it enables lots of use cases not defined in original specification and some of them are clashing little bit, so for now, I kept everything as it was when you are not using extended extensions.

Everything mentioned in this article is already available in Tyrus 1.4-SNAPSHOT and will be part of 1.4 release.

  • Extension / Frame Validation
  • Frame representation – frame types
  • Frame representation – payload representation
  • Frame representation – masking – remove? (current state: container responsibility)
  • Exception handling – processIncoming and processOutgoing methods (current state: exceptions are logged)
  • Exception handling – onExtensionNegotiation
  • Possibility to reject negotiation extension in onExtensionNegotiation (based on extension params)
  • Extension ordering (current state: handshake response header order)
  • Extension resource validation (two extensions using same RSV bit(s) cannot be negotiated)
  • PerMessageDeflate – parameters
  • MultiplexingExtension – implement when (if) ready

Conclusion

There is still lots of decisions to be made and things to do, but it seems like we can implement usable extensions which are supported by newer versions of browsers and containers. PerMessageDeflate extension is nice example of handy feature which can save significant resources.

Links

Wednesday Dec 18, 2013

Want to work on Tyrus? We are hiring!

Tyrus project is looking for another contributor! If you want to became part of the team which is working on WebSocket API for Java (JSR 356) Reference implementation and related projects and products, this is the time to update your CV and share it with us. This job position is based in Prague, Czech Republic.

Formal job offer can be found on linked in.

If you are interested and have any questions, feel free to contact me directly via this blog or via pavel.bucek at oracle.com.

Friday Dec 13, 2013

Tyrus container SPI

This blog post will be little more technical and insightful into Tyrus internals and won’t be as useful for common users which are just trying to use it for creating their web socket endpoint. I will describe how you can run Tyrus client or server side on virtually any container with a little help. We will start with Client side – it is a little bit simpler I think – then go through Server side and at the end I will present simple in-memory container which is already present in Tyrus workspace and is part of latest release (1.3.3).

Let me start with little background. Tyrus originally started as something built on top of project Grizzly, which serves as NIO layer in Glassfish. Grizzly had (still has) its own API which supports creating web socket endpoints and does even have client implementation. Then JSR 356 was started, Tyrus (originally called “websocket-sdk“) was created and it was just a simple adaptation layer on top of Grizzly container. Then it was decided that this JSR will  be part of Java EE 7. This brought much more visibility to this project and also some more requirements. Tyrus was required to run on any Java EE 7 compliant container, utilising Servlet 3.1 API (upgrade mechanism, non-blocking reads and writes). So another layer was created, this time slightly more low level, because Tyrus was required to handle reading and writing, something which was previously handled by Grizzly. The decision was made, Tyrus adopted some Grizzly code and the Container SPI started to form. Tyrus still kept Grizzly container support and it was able to work with Servet 3.1 API as well. (Just for the sake of completeness – this is about server side. Client part always exclusively used Grizzly as container).

Then another requirement came – it was decided that Tyrus will be integrated into WebLogic server (it will be part of upcoming 12.1.3 release). Initial integration used lots of Tyrus internals which was kind of scary, because future integrations might require significant amount of time, especially when considering some not trivial features we plan for Tyrus (Extension support, subprotocols, etc). WebLogic 12.1.3 does not contain Grizzly nor Servlet 3.1 implementation, so we needed to have something which will be more stable than any other Tyrus internal class.

Small note – this is final version of the SPI for now, it does not mean that it won’t change. We might need to extend it to support some new features or fix bugs. Also there is no discovery mechanism in place (yet), so implementors of these SPI will have direct dependency on some Tyrus internal class(es). These internal classes (TyrusWebSocketEngine, etc.) may be changed, but there is higher resistance mode for these, so it shouldn’t be done that often and if we can achieve backwards compatibility, we will. Discovery mechanism will most likely be introduced sometime later..

Enough with this history lesson, let’s get to the code part.

Client SPI

Client side container is basically only about implementing ClientContainer. Method openClientSocket will be called when ClientManager needs to connect to server endpoint and following sequence of calls is then expected:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
public class MyClientContainer implements ClientContainer {
@Override
public void openClientSocket(String url,
ClientEndpointConfig cec,
Map<String, Object> properties,
ClientEngine clientEngine)
throws DeploymentException, IOException {
// initialize container, open connection
final UpgradeRequest upgradeRequest =
clientEngine.createUpgradeRequest(URI.create(url),
new ClientEngine.TimeoutHandler() {
...
});
// handle ssl and proxies here if required
// write upgradeRequest
// wait for response, create UpgradeResponse instance
// create custom writer
// create connection close listener
// get Connection