Legal writers on the Internet have viewed it as a giant copying and
They are not far off the mark, and from this position,
they have argued that the Internet should be let loose as such a machine with only minimal
limitations, and that the legislature need to reconsider and rewrite
copyright laws to bring them back to their original intent.
Let the machine do what it does best and figure out how to use it to benefit society at large, they have argued.
Roberto Chinnici and Michael Calore write about a major use of BitTorrent protocol for (copying and) distribution of video content from a major news media outlet, the BBC.
This is a grand idea and a great use of the machine.
The only potential downside I could see is that BitTorrent works best when a piece is popular. For it to work for programming that does not always suit the popular taste of the masses, a major news outlet must also use enough torrent seeds to ensure these programs remain available for distribution. This way the less popular programming can still have the minimal torrent seeding necessary for efficient distribution while the more popular programming gets the benefit of additional distribution through the collaborative distribution BitTorrent makes possible as a piece becomes increasingly popular. In other words, popularity should (and can, thanks to BitTorrent) pay for itself.
One day, the designer of BitTorrent will be considered a great visionary who changed the face of the Internet. He made a great leap to make the copying and distribution machine more efficient and more fair.