Wednesday Sep 25, 2013

SPARC T5 Encryption Performance Tops Intel E5-2600 v2 Processor

The cryptography benchmark suite was developed by Oracle to measure security performance on important AES security modes. Oracle's SPARC T5 processor with it security software in silicon is faster than x86 servers that have the AES-NI instructions. In this test, the performance of on-processor encryption operations is measured (32 KB encryptions). Multiple threads are used to measure each processors maximum throughput. The SPARC T5-8 shows dramatically faster encryption.

  • A SPARC T5 processor running Oracle Solaris 11.1 is 2.7 times faster executing AES-CFB 256-bit key encryption (in cache) than the Intel E5-2697 v2 processor (with AES-NI) running Oracle Linux 6.3. AES-CFB encryption is used by Oracle Database for Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) which provides security for database storage.

  • On the AES-CFB 128-bit key encryption, the SPARC T5 processor is 2.5 times faster than the Intel E5-2697 v2 processor (with AES-NI) running Oracle Linux 6.3 for in-cache encryption. AES-CFB mode is used by Oracle Database for Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) which provides security for database storage.

  • The IBM POWER7+ has three hardware security units for 8-core processors, but IBM has not publicly shown any measured performance results on AES-CFB or other encryption modes.

Performance Landscape

Presented below are results for running encryption using the AES cipher with the CFB, CBC, CCM and GCM modes for key sizes of 128, 192 and 256. Decryption performance was similar and is not presented. Results are presented as MB/sec (10**6).

Encryption Performance – AES-CFB

Performance is presented for in-cache AES-CFB128 mode encryption. Multiple key sizes of 256-bit, 192-bit and 128-bit are presented. The encryption was performance on 32 KB of pseudo-random data (same data for each run).

AES-CFB
Microbenchmark Performance (MB/sec)
Processor GHz Chips Performance Software Environment
AES-256-CFB
SPARC T5 3.60 2 54,396 Oracle Solaris 11.1, libsoftcrypto + libumem
Intel E5-2697 v2 2.70 2 19,960 Oracle Linux 6.3, IPP/AES-NI
Intel E5-2690 2.90 2 12,823 Oracle Linux 6.3, IPP/AES-NI
AES-192-CFB
SPARC T5 3.60 2 61,000 Oracle Solaris 11.1, libsoftcrypto + libumem
Intel E5-2697 v2 2.70 2 23,217 Oracle Linux 6.3, IPP/AES-NI
Intel E5-2690 2.90 2 14,928 Oracle Linux 6.3, IPP/AES-NI
AES-128-CFB
SPARC T5 3.60 2 68,695 Oracle Solaris 11.1, libsoftcrypto + libumem
Intel E5-2697 v2 2.70 2 27,740 Oracle Linux 6.3, IPP/AES-NI
Intel E5-2690 2.90 2 17,824 Oracle Linux 6.3, IPP/AES-NI

Encryption Performance – AES-GCM

Performance is presented for in-cache AES-GCM mode encryption with authentication. Multiple key sizes of 256-bit, 192-bit and 128-bit are presented. The encryption/authentication was performance on 32 KB of pseudo-random data (same data for each run).

AES-GCM
Microbenchmark Performance (MB/sec)
Processor GHz Chips Performance Software Environment
AES-256-GCM
SPARC T5 3.60 2 34,101 Oracle Solaris 11.1, libsoftcrypto + libumem
Intel E5-2697 v2 2.70 2 15,338 Oracle Solaris 11.1, libsoftcrypto + libumem
Intel E5-2690 2.90 2 13,520 Oracle Linux 6.3, IPP/AES-NI
AES-192-GCM
SPARC T5 3.60 2 36,852 Oracle Solaris 11.1, libsoftcrypto + libumem
Intel E5-2697 v2 2.70 2 15,768 Oracle Solaris 11.1, libsoftcrypto + libumem
Intel E5-2690 2.90 2 14,159 Oracle Linux 6.3, IPP/AES-NI
AES-128-GCM
SPARC T5 3.60 2 39,003 Oracle Solaris 11.1, libsoftcrypto + libumem
Intel E5-2697 v2 2.70 2 16,405 Oracle Solaris 11.1, libsoftcrypto + libumem
Intel E5-2690 2.90 2 14,877 Oracle Linux 6.3, IPP/AES-NI

Encryption Performance – AES-CCM

Performance is presented for in-cache AES-CCM mode encryption with authentication. Multiple key sizes of 256-bit, 192-bit and 128-bit are presented. The encryption/authentication was performance on 32 KB of pseudo-random data (same data for each run).

AES-CCM
Microbenchmark Performance (MB/sec)
Processor GHz Chips Performance Software Environment
AES-256-CCM
SPARC T5 3.60 2 29,431 Oracle Solaris 11.1, libsoftcrypto + libumem
Intel E5-2697 v2 2.70 2 19,447 Oracle Linux 6.3, IPP/AES-NI
Intel E5-2690 2.90 2 12,493 Oracle Linux 6.3, IPP/AES-NI
AES-192-CCM
SPARC T5 3.60 2 33,715 Oracle Solaris 11.1, libsoftcrypto + libumem
Intel E5-2697 v2 2.70 2 22,634 Oracle Linux 6.3, IPP/AES-NI
Intel E5-2690 2.90 2 14,507 Oracle Linux 6.3, IPP/AES-NI
AES-128-CCM
SPARC T5 3.60 2 39,188 Oracle Solaris 11.1, libsoftcrypto + libumem
Intel E5-2697 v2 2.70 2 26,951 Oracle Linux 6.3, IPP/AES-NI
Intel E5-2690 2.90 2 17,256 Oracle Linux 6.3, IPP/AES-NI

Encryption Performance – AES-CBC

Performance is presented for in-cache AES-CBC mode encryption. Multiple key sizes of 256-bit, 192-bit and 128-bit are presented. The encryption was performance on 32 KB of pseudo-random data (same data for each run).

AES-CBC
Microbenchmark Performance (MB/sec)
Processor GHz Chips Performance Software Environment
AES-256-CBC
SPARC T5 3.60 2 56,933 Oracle Solaris 11.1, libsoftcrypto + libumem
Intel E5-2697 v2 2.70 2 19,962 Oracle Linux 6.3, IPP/AES-NI
Intel E5-2690 2.90 2 12,822 Oracle Linux 6.3, IPP/AES-NI
AES-192-CBC
SPARC T5 3.60 2 63,767 Oracle Solaris 11.1, libsoftcrypto + libumem
Intel E5-2697 v2 2.70 2 23,224 Oracle Linux 6.3, IPP/AES-NI
Intel E5-2690 2.90 2 14,915 Oracle Linux 6.3, IPP/AES-NI
AES-128-CBC
SPARC T5 3.60 2 72,508 Oracle Solaris 11.1, libsoftcrypto + libumem
Intel E5-2697 v2 2.70 2 27,733 Oracle Linux 6.3, IPP/AES-NI
Intel E5-2690 2.90 2 17,823 Oracle Linux 6.3, IPP/AES-NI

Configuration Summary

SPARC T5-2 server
2 x SPARC T5 processor, 3.6 GHz
512 GB memory
Oracle Solaris 11.1 SRU 4.2

Sun Server X4-2L server
2 x E5-2697 v2 processors, 2.70 GHz
256 GB memory
Oracle Linux 6.3

Sun Server X3-2 server
2 x E5-2690 processors, 2.90 GHz
128 GB memory
Oracle Linux 6.3

Benchmark Description

The benchmark measures cryptographic capabilities in terms of general low-level encryption, in-cache (32 KB encryptions) and on-chip using various ciphers, including AES-128-CFB, AES-192-CFB, AES-256-CFB, AES-128-CBC, AES-192-CBC, AES-256-CBC, AES-128-CCM, AES-192-CCM, AES-256-CCM, AES-128-GCM, AES-192-GCM and AES-256-GCM.

The benchmark results were obtained using tests created by Oracle which use various application interfaces to perform the various ciphers. They were run using optimized libraries for each platform to obtain the best possible performance.

See Also

Disclosure Statement

Copyright 2013, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Oracle and Java are registered trademarks of Oracle and/or its affiliates. Other names may be trademarks of their respective owners. Results as of 9/23/2013.

Friday Mar 29, 2013

SPARC T5 System Performance for Encryption Microbenchmark

The cryptography benchmark suite was internally developed by Oracle to measure the maximum throughput of in-memory, on-chip encryption operations that a system can perform. Multiple threads are used to achieve the maximum throughput. Systems powered by Oracle's SPARC T5 processor show outstanding performance on the tested encryption operations, beating Intel processor based systems.

  • A SPARC T5 processor running Oracle Solaris 11.1 runs from 2.4x to 4.4x faster on AES 256-bit key encryption than the Intel E5-2690 processor running in-memory encryption of 32 KB blocks using CFB128, CBC, CCM and GCM modes fully hardware subscribed.

  • AES CFB mode is used by the Oracle Database 11g for Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) which provides security to database storage.

Performance Landscape

Presented below are results for running encryption using the AES cipher with the CFB, CBC, CCM and GCM modes for key sizes of 128, 192 and 256. Decryption performance was similar and is not presented. Results are presented as MB/sec (10**6).

Encryption Performance – AES-CFB

Performance is presented for in-memory AES-CFB128 mode encryption. Multiple key sizes of 256-bit, 192-bit and 128-bit are presented. The encryption was performance on 32 KB of pseudo-random data (same data for each run).

AES-CFB
Microbenchmark Performance (MB/sec)
Processor GHz Chips Performance Software Environment
AES-256-CFB
SPARC T5 3.60 2 54,396 Oracle Solaris 11.1, libsoftcrypto + libumem
Intel E5-2690 2.90 2 12,823 IPP/AES-NI
AES-192-CFB
SPARC T5 3.60 2 61,000 Oracle Solaris 11.1, libsoftcrypto + libumem
Intel E5-2690 2.90 2 14,928 IPP/AES-NI
AES-128-CFB
SPARC T5 3.60 2 68,695 Oracle Solaris 11.1, libsoftcrypto + libumem
Intel E5-2690 2.90 2 17,824 IPP/AES-NI

Encryption Performance – AES-CBC

Performance is presented for in-memory AES-CBC mode encryption. Multiple key sizes of 256-bit, 192-bit and 128-bit are presented. The encryption was performance on 32 KB of pseudo-random data (same data for each run).

AES-CBC
Microbenchmark Performance (MB/sec)
Processor GHz Chips Performance Software Environment
AES-256-CBC
SPARC T5 3.60 2 56,933 Oracle Solaris 11.1, libsoftcrypto + libumem
Intel E5-2690 2.90 2 12,822 IPP/AES-NI
AES-192-CBC
SPARC T5 3.60 2 63,767 Oracle Solaris 11.1, libsoftcrypto + libumem
Intel E5-2690 2.90 2 14,915 IPP/AES-NI
AES-128-CBC
SPARC T5 3.60 2 72,508 Oracle Solaris 11.1, libsoftcrypto + libumem
SPARC T4 2.85 2 31,085 Oracle Solaris 11.1, libsoftcrypto + libumem
Intel X5690 3.47 2 20,721 IPP/AES-NI
Intel E5-2690 2.90 2 17,823 IPP/AES-NI

Encryption Performance – AES-CCM

Performance is presented for in-memory AES-CCM mode encryption with authentication. Multiple key sizes of 256-bit, 192-bit and 128-bit are presented. The encryption/authentication was performance on 32 KB of pseudo-random data (same data for each run).

AES-CCM
Microbenchmark Performance (MB/sec)
Processor GHz Chips Performance Software Environment
AES-256-CCM
SPARC T5 3.60 2 29,431 Oracle Solaris 11.1, libsoftcrypto + libumem
Intel E5-2690 2.90 2 12,493 IPP/AES-NI
AES-192-CCM
SPARC T5 3.60 2 33,715 Oracle Solaris 11.1, libsoftcrypto + libumem
Intel E5-2690 2.90 2 14,507 IPP/AES-NI
AES-128-CCM
SPARC T5 3.60 2 39,188 Oracle Solaris 11.1, libsoftcrypto + libumem
Intel E5-2690 2.90 2 17,256 IPP/AES-NI

Encryption Performance – AES-GCM

Performance is presented for in-memory AES-GCM mode encryption with authentication. Multiple key sizes of 256-bit, 192-bit and 128-bit are presented. The encryption/authentication was performance on 32 KB of pseudo-random data (same data for each run).

AES-GCM
Microbenchmark Performance (MB/sec)
Processor GHz Chips Performance Software Environment
AES-256-GCM
SPARC T5 3.60 2 34,101 Oracle Solaris 11.1, libsoftcrypto + libumem
Intel E5-2690 2.90 2 13,520 IPP/AES-NI
AES-192-GCM
SPARC T5 3.60 2 36,852 Oracle Solaris 11.1, libsoftcrypto + libumem
Intel E5-2690 2.90 2 14,159 IPP/AES-NI
AES-128-GCM
SPARC T5 3.60 2 39,003 Oracle Solaris 11.1, libsoftcrypto + libumem
Intel E5-2690 2.90 2 14,877 IPP/AES-NI

Configuration Summary

SPARC T5-2 server
2 x SPARC T5 processor, 3.6 GHz
512 GB memory
Oracle Solaris 11.1 SRU 4.2

Sun Server X3-2 server
2 x E5-2690 processors, 2.90 GHz
128 GB memory

Benchmark Description

The benchmark measures cryptographic capabilities in terms of general low-level encryption, in-memory and on-chip using various ciphers, including AES-128-CFB, AES-192-CFB, AES-256-CFB, AES-128-CBC, AES-192-CBC, AES-256-CBC, AES-128-CCM, AES-192-CCM, AES-256-CCM, AES-128-GCM, AES-192-GCM and AES-256-GCM.

The benchmark results were obtained using tests created by Oracle which use various application interfaces to perform the various ciphers. They were run using optimized libraries for each platform to obtain the best possible performance.

See Also

Disclosure Statement

Copyright 2013, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Oracle and Java are registered trademarks of Oracle and/or its affiliates. Other names may be trademarks of their respective owners. Results as of 3/26/2013.

Tuesday Mar 26, 2013

SPARC T5-2 Achieves JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Benchmark World Records

Oracle produced World Record batch throughput for single system results on Oracle's JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Day-in-the-Life benchmark using Oracle's SPARC T5-2 server running Oracle Solaris Containers and consolidating JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, Oracle WebLogic servers and the Oracle Database 11g Release 2. There are two workloads tested: online plus batch workload and batch-only workload.

Online plus batch workload:

  • The SPARC T5-2 server delivered a result of 12,000 online users at 180 msec average response time while concurrently executing a mix of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne long and short batch processes at 198.5 UBEs/min (Universal Batch Engines per minute).

  • The SPARC T5-2 server online plus batch throughput is 2.7x higher than the IBM Power 770 server, both running 12,000 online users.

  • The SPARC T5-2 server online plus batch throughput is 6x higher per chip than the IBM Power 770 server. The SPARC T5-2 server has 2 chips and the IBM Power 770 has 4 chips, both ran 12,000 online users.

  • The SPARC T5-2 server online plus batch throughput is 3x higher per core than the IBM Power 770 server. Both servers have 32 cores and ran 12,000 online users.

Batch-only workload:

  • The SPARC T5-2 server delivered throughput of 880 UBEs/min while executing the batch-only workload (Long and Short batch processes).

  • The SPARC T5-2 server batch-only throughput is 2.7x faster per chip than the IBM Power 770 server. The SPARC T5-2 server has 2 chips and the IBM Power 770 has 4 chips.

  • The SPARC T5-2 server batch-only throughput is 1.4x higher per core than the IBM Power 770 server. Both servers have 32 cores.

  • The SPARC T5-2 server batch-only throughput is 61% faster than the Cisco multiple system solution.

  • The SPARC T5-2 server batch-only throughput is 5x faster per chip than the Cisco UCS B200/B250 M2 servers. The SPARC T5-2 server has 2 chips and the Cisco 3 server solution has 6 chips.

  • The SPARC T5-2 server batch-only throughput is 18x higher per core than the Cisco UCS B200/B250 M2 servers. The SPARC T5-2 server has 32 cores while the Cisco solution utilized 36 cores.

Both workloads:

  • The SPARC T5-2 server offers a 5.4x cost savings for the application server when compared to the IBM Power 770 application server.

  • The SPARC T5-2 server running Oracle Solaris Containers and consolidating JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, Oracle WebLogic servers and the Oracle Database 11g Release 2 utilized a maximum 65% of the available CPU power, leaving headroom for additional processing.

  • The database server in a shared-server configuration allows for optimized CPU resource utilization and significant memory savings on the SPARC T5-2 server without sacrificing performance.

Performance Landscape

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Day in the Life (DIL) Benchmark
Consolidated Online with Batch Workload
System Rack
Units (U)
Batch
Rate
(UBEs/min)
Online
Users
Users/
U
UBEs/
Core
UBEs/
Chip
Version
SPARC T5-2 (2 x SPARC T5, 3.6 GHz) 3 198.5 12000 4000 6.2 99 9.0.2
IBM Power 770 (4 x POWER7, 3.3 GHz) 8 65 12000 1500 2.0 16 9.0.2

Batch Rate (UBEs/min) — Batch transaction rate in UBEs per minute.

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Batch Only Benchmark
System Rack
Units (U)
Batch
Rate
(UBEs/min)
UBEs/
U
UBEs/
Core
UBEs/
Chip
Version
SPARC T5-2 (2 x SPARC T5, 3.6 GHz) 3 880 267 25 440 9.0.2
IBM Power 770 (4 x POWER7, 3.3 GHz) 8 643 81 20 161 9.0.2
2 x Cisco B200 M2 (2 x X5690, 3.46 GHz)
1 x Cisco B250 M2 (2 x X5680, 3.33 GHz)
3 546 182 15 91 9.0.2

Configuration Summary

Hardware Configuration:

1 x SPARC T5-2 server with
2 x SPARC T5 processors, 3.6 GHz
512 GB memory
4 x 300 GB 10K RPM SAS internal disk
2 x 300 GB internal SSD
4 x Sun Flash Accelerator F40 PCIe Card (4 x 93 GB)

Software Configuration:

Oracle Solaris 10 1/13
Oracle Solaris Containers
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne 9.0.2
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Tools (8.98.4.2)
Oracle WebLogic Server 11g (10.3.4)
Oracle HTTP Server 11g
Oracle Database 11g Release 2 (11.2.0.3)

Benchmark Description

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is an integrated applications suite of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software. Oracle offers 70 JD Edwards EnterpriseOne application modules to support a diverse set of business operations.

Oracle's Day in the Life (DIL) kit is a suite of scripts that exercises most common transactions of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne applications, including business processes such as payroll, sales order, purchase order, work order, and manufacturing processes, such as ship confirmation. These are labeled by industry acronyms such as SCM, CRM, HCM, SRM and FMS. The kit's scripts execute transactions typical of a mid-sized manufacturing company.

  • The workload consists of online transactions and the UBE – Universal Business Engine workload of 61 short and 4 long UBEs.

  • LoadRunner runs the DIL workload, collects the user’s transactions response times and reports the key metric of Combined Weighted Average Transaction Response time.

  • The UBE processes workload runs from the JD Enterprise Application server.

    • Oracle's UBE processes come as three flavors:
      • Short UBEs < 1 minute engage in Business Report and Summary Analysis,
      • Mid UBEs > 1 minute create a large report of Account, Balance, and Full Address,
      • Long UBEs > 2 minutes simulate Payroll, Sales Order, night only jobs.
    • The UBE workload generates large numbers of PDF files reports and log files.
    • The UBE Queues are categorized as the QBATCHD, a single threaded queue for large and medium UBEs, and the QPROCESS queue for short UBEs run concurrently.

Oracle's UBE process performance metric is Number of Maximum Concurrent UBE processes at transaction rate, UBEs/minute.

Key Points and Best Practices

Four Oracle Solaris processors sets were used with Oracle Solaris Containers assigned to the processor sets as follows:

  • one JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Application server, two Oracle WebLogic Servers 11g Release 1 each coupled with an Oracle Web Tier HTTP server instances (online workload), each in an Oracle Solaris Container (three total),

  • one JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Application server (for batch only workload) in an Oracle Solaris Container,

  • Oracle Database 11g Release 2.0.3 database in an Oracle Solaris Container,

  • the Oracle database log writer.

Other items of note:

  • Each Oracle WebLogic vertical cluster, with twelve managed instances, was configured in a dedicated webserver container in order to load balance users' requests and to provide the infrastructure to support high number of users with ease of deployment and high availability.

  • The database redo logs were configured on the raw disk partitions.

  • The mixed batch workload of 44 short UBEs and 8 long UBEs was executed concurrently with the 12,000 online application users, producing a sustained rate of 198.5 UBE/min.

See Also

Disclosure Statement

Copyright 2013, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Oracle and Java are registered trademarks of Oracle and/or its affiliates. Other names may be trademarks of their respective owners. Results as of 03/26/2013

SPARC T5-2 (SPARC T5-2 Server base package, 2xSPARC T5 16-core processors, 32x16GB-1066 DIMMS, 4x600GB 10K RPM 2.5. SAS-2 HDD,2x300GB SSDs, 4x Sun Flash Accelerator F40 PCIe Cards, 2x Power Cables) List Price $98,190. IBM Power 770 (IBM Power 770:9917 Model MMC, 2x3.3GHz 16-core, 32x one processor activation, 2xCEC Enclosure with IBM Bezel, I/O Backplane and System Midplane,2x Service Processor, 16x 0/64GB DDR3 Memory (4x16GB) DIMMS-1066MHz Power7 CoD Memory, 24x Activation of 1 GB DDR3 Power7 Memory, 10x Activation of 100GB DDR3 Power7 Memory, 2x Disk/Media Backplane. 2x 300GB SAS 15K RPM 2.5. HDD (AIX/Linux only), 1x SATA slimline DVD-RAM drive, 4x AC Power Supply 1925W) List Price $532,143. Source: ibm.com, collected 03/18/2013.

SPARC T5 Systems Produce Oracle TimesTen Benchmark World Record

The Oracle TimesTen In-Memory Database is optimized to run on Oracle's SPARC T5 processor platforms running Oracle Solaris 11. In this series of tests, systems with the new SPARC T5 processor were significantly faster than systems based on other processors. Two tests were run to explore TimesTen performance: a Mobile Call Processing test (based on customer workload) and Oracle's TimesTen Performance Throughput Benchmark (TPTBM). TimesTen version 11.2.2.4 was used for all tests.

  • On the TimesTen Performance Throughput Benchmark (TPTBM), SPARC T5-8 server produced a world record 59.9 million read transactions per second.

  • On the Mobile Call Processing test, the SPARC T5 processor achieves 2.4 times more throughput than the Intel Xeon E7-4870 processor. The two-chip SPARC T5-2 server is 22% faster than an x86 server with four Intel E7-4870 2.4 GHz processors.

  • On the TimesTen Performance Throughput Benchmark (TPTBM) read-only workload, the SPARC T5 processor achieves 2.2 times higher throughput than the Intel Xeon E7-4870 processor. On the same workload, the two-chip SPARC T5-2 server produces 10% more throughput than an x86 server with four Intel E7-4870 processors and has almost twice the performance of a 2-chip Intel E5-2680 system.

  • With the TPTBM read-only workload, the SPARC T5-8 server delivers 3.8x more throughput than a SPARC T5-2 Server, showing excellent scalability.

  • The SPARC T5 processor delivers over twice the performace of the previous generation SPARC T4 processor and over 4x the performace of the SPARC T3 processor, all in the same amount of space.

  • The SPARC T5-2 server delivers 2.4x the performace of the SPARC T4-2 server in the same 3U space. This is better performance than that of the SPARC T4-4 server which occupies 5U.

Performance Landscape

Mobile Call Processing Test Performance

Processor Tps
SPARC T5, 3.6 GHz 367,600
Intel Xeon E7-4870, 2.4 GHz 302,000
SPARC T4, 2.85 GHz 230,500

All systems measured using Oracle Solaris 11 and Oracle TimesTen In-Memory Database 11.2.2.4.1

TimesTen Performance Throughput Benchmark (TPTBM) Read-Only

System Processor Chips Tps Tps/
Chip
SPARC T5-8 SPARC T5, 3.6 GHz 8 59.9M 7.5M
SPARC T5-2 SPARC T5, 3.6 GHz 2 15.9M 7.9M
x86 Intel Xeon E7-4870, 2.4 GHz 4 14.5M 3.6M
SPARC T4-4 SPARC T4, 3.0 GHz 4 14.2M 3.6M
x86* Intel Xeon E5-2680, 2.7 GHz 2 8.5M 4.3
SPARC T4-2 SPARC T4, 2.85 GHz 2 6.5M 3.3M
SPARC T3-4 SPARC T3, 1.65 GHz 4 7.9M 1.9M
T5440 SPARC T2+, 1.4 GHz 4 3.1M 0.8M

All systems measured using Oracle Solaris 11 and Oracle TimesTen In-Memory Database 11.2.2.4.1

*Intel E5-2680 using Oracle Linux and Oracle TimesTen In-Memory Database 11.2.2.4.1

TimesTen Performance Throughput Benchmark (TPTBM) Update-Only

Processor Tps
SPARC T5, 3.6 GHz 1,031.7K
Intel Xeon E7-4870, 2.4 GHz 988.1K
Intel Xeon E5-2680, 2.7 GHz * 944.3K
SPARC T4, 3.0 GHz 678.0K

All systems measured using Oracle Solaris 11 and Oracle TimesTen In-Memory Database 11.2.2.4.1

*Intel E5-2680 using Oracle Linux and Oracle TimesTen In-Memory Database 11.2.2.4.1

Configuration Summary

Hardware Configurations:

SPARC T5-8 server
8 x SPARC T5 processors, 3.6 GHz
2 TB memory
1 x 8 Gbs FC Qlogic HBA
1 x 6 Gbs SAS HBA
2 x 300 GB internal disks
Oracle Solaris 11
TimesTen 11.2.2.4.1
1 x Sun Fire X4275 server configured as COMSTAR redo head (log)

SPARC T5-2 server
2 x SPARC T5 processors, 3.6 GHz
512 GB memory
1 x 8 Gbs FC Qlogic HBA
1 x 6 Gbs SAS HBA
2 x 300 GB internal disks
Oracle Solaris 11
TimesTen 11.2.2.4.1
1 x Sun Fire X4275 server configured as COMSTAR redo head (log)

SPARC T4-4 server
4 x SPARC T4 processors, 3.0 GHz
1 TB memory
1 x 8 Gbs FC Qlogic HBA
1 x 6 Gbs SAS HBA
6 x 300 GB internal disks
Oracle Solaris 11
TimesTen 11.2.2.4.1
Sun Storage F5100 Flash Array (80 x 24 GB flash modules)
1 x Sun Fire X4275 server configured as COMSTAR redo head (log)

SPARC T4-2 server
2 x SPARC T4 processors, 2.85 GHz
256 GB memory
1 x 8 Gbs FC Qlogic HBA
1 x 6 Gbs SAS HBA
4 x 300 GB internal disks
Oracle Solaris 11
TimesTen 11.2.2.4.1
Sun Storage F5100 Flash Array (40 x 24 GB flash modules)
1 x Sun Fire X4275 server configured as COMSTAR head

SPARC T3-4 server
4 x SPARC T3 processors, 1.6 GHz
512 GB memory
1 x 8 Gbs FC Qlogic HBA
8 x 146 GB internal disks
Oracle Solaris 11
TimesTen 11.2.2.4.1
1 x Sun Fire X4275 server configured as COMSTAR head

Intel Server x86_64
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 processors, 2.7 GHz
256 GB memory
4 x SSD SAS disks (log)
1 x 600 GB internal disks
Oracle Linux
TimesTen 11.2.2.4.1

Sun Server X2-4
4 x Intel Xeon E7-4870 processors, 2.4 GHz
512 GB memory
1 x 8 Gbs FC Qlogic HBA
6 x 146 GB internal disks
Oracle Solaris 11
TimesTen 11.2.2.4.1
1 x Sun Fire X4275 server configured as COMSTAR redo head (log)

Benchmark Descriptions

TimesTen Performance Throughput BenchMark (TPTBM) is shipped with TimesTen and measures the total throughput of the system. The benchmark workloads can be reads, inserts, updates, and delete operations, or a mix of them as required.

Mobile Call Processing is a customer-based workload for processing calls made by mobile phone subscribers. The workload has a mixture of read-only, update, and insert-only transactions. The peak throughput performance is measured from multiple concurrent processes executing the transactions until a peak performance is reached via saturation of the available resources.

Key Points and Best Practices

The Mobile Call Processing test utilized Oracle Solaris processor sets in all environments for optimum performance. This features isolates running processes from other processes in the system. Combined with parameters to limit memory pages to the lgroup within the processor set and isolating the processor set to a single processor within the system.

See Also

Disclosure Statement

Copyright 2013, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Oracle and Java are registered trademarks of Oracle and/or its affiliates. Other names may be trademarks of their respective owners. Results as of 26 March 2013.

SPARC T5-2 Achieves ZFS File System Encryption Benchmark World Record

Oracle continues to lead in enterprise security. Oracle's SPARC T5 processors combined with the Oracle Solaris ZFS file system demonstrate faster file system encryption than equivalent x86 systems using the Intel Xeon Processor E5-2600 Sequence chips which have AES-NI security instructions.

Encryption is the process where data is encoded for privacy and a key is needed by the data owner to access the encoded data.

  • The SPARC T5-2 server is 3.4x faster than a 2 processor Intel Xeon E5-2690 server running Oracle Solaris 11.1 that uses the AES-NI GCM security instructions for creating encrypted files.

  • The SPARC T5-2 server is 2.2x faster than a 2 processor Intel Xeon E5-2690 server running Oracle Solaris 11.1 that uses the AES-NI CCM security instructions for creating encrypted files.

  • The SPARC T5-2 server consumes a significantly less percentage of system resources as compared to a 2 processor Intel Xeon E5-2690 server.

Performance Landscape

Below are results running two different ciphers for ZFS encryption. Results are presented for runs without any cipher, labeled clear, and a variety of different key lengths. The results represent the maximum delivered values measured for 3 concurrent sequential write operations using 1M blocks. Performance is measured in MB/sec (bigger is better). System utilization is reported as %CPU as measured by iostat (smaller is better).

The results for the x86 server were obtained using Oracle Solaris 11.1 with performance bug fixes.

Encryption Using AES-GCM Ciphers

System GCM Encryption: 3 Concurrent Sequential Writes
Clear AES-256-GCM AES-192-GCM AES-128-GCM
MB/sec %CPU MB/sec %CPU MB/sec %CPU MB/sec %CPU
SPARC T5-2 server 3,918 7 3,653 14 3,676 15 3,628 14
SPARC T4-2 server 2,912 11 2,662 31 2,663 30 2,779 31
2-Socket Intel Xeon E5-2690 3,969 42 1,062 58 1,067 58 1,076 57
SPARC T5-2 vs x86 server 1.0x 3.4x 3.4x 3.4x

Encryption Using AES-CCM Ciphers

System CCM Encryption: 3 Concurrent Sequential Writes
Clear AES-256-CCM AES-192-CCM AES-128-CCM
MB/sec %CPU MB/sec %CPU MB/sec %CPU MB/sec %CPU
SPARC T5-2 server 3,862 7 3,665 15 3,622 14 3,707 12
SPARC T4-2 server 2,945 11 2,471 26 2,801 26 2,442 25
2-Socket Intel Xeon E5-2690 3,868 42 1,566 64 1,632 63 1,689 66
SPARC T5-2 vs x86 server 1.0x 2.3x 2.2x 2.2x

Configuration Summary

Storage Configuration:

Sun Storage 6780 array
4 CSM2 trays, each with 16 83GB 15K RPM drives
8x 8 GB/sec Fiber Channel ports per host
R0 Write cache enabled, controller mirroring off for peak write bandwidth
8 Drive R0 512K stripe pools mirrored via ZFS to storage

Sun Storage 6580 array
9 CSM2 trays, each with 16 136GB 15K RPM drives
8x 4 GB/sec Fiber Channel ports per host
R0 Write cache enabled, controller mirroring off for peak write bandwidth
4 Drive R0 512K stripe pools mirrored via ZFS to storage

Server Configuration:

SPARC T5-2 server
2 x SPARC T5 3.6 GHz processors
512 GB memory
Oracle Solaris 11.1

SPARC T4-2 server
2 x SPARC T4 2.85 GHz processors
256 GB memory
Oracle Solaris 11.1

Sun Server X3-2L server
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2690, 2.90 GHz processors
128 GB memory
Oracle Solaris 11.1

Switch Configuration:

Brocade 5300 FC switch

Benchmark Description

This benchmark evaluates secure file system performance by measuring the rate at which encrypted data can be written. The Vdbench tool was used to generate the IO load. The test performed 3 concurrent sequential write operations using 1M blocks to 3 separate files.

Key Points and Best Practices

  • ZFS encryption is integrated with the ZFS command set. Like other ZFS operations, encryption operations such as key changes and re-key are performed online.

  • Data is encrypted using AES (Advanced Encryption Standard) with key lengths of 256, 192, and 128 in the CCM and GCM operation modes.

  • The flexibility of encrypting specific file systems is a key feature.

  • ZFS encryption is inheritable to descendent file systems. Key management can be delegated through ZFS delegated administration.

  • ZFS encryption uses the Oracle Solaris Cryptographic Framework which gives it access to SPARC T5 and Intel Xeon E5-2690 processor hardware acceleration or to optimized software implementations of the encryption algorithms automatically.

  • On modern computers with multiple threads per core, simple statistics like %utilization measured in tools like iostat and vmstat are not "hard" indications of the resources that might be available for other processing. For example, 90% idle may not mean that 10 times the work can be done. So drawing numerical conclusions must be done carefully.

See Also

Disclosure Statement

Copyright 2013, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Oracle and Java are registered trademarks of Oracle and/or its affiliates. Other names may be trademarks of their respective owners. Results as of March 26, 2013.

About

BestPerf is the source of Oracle performance expertise. In this blog, Oracle's Strategic Applications Engineering group explores Oracle's performance results and shares best practices learned from working on Enterprise-wide Applications.

Index Pages
Search

Archives
« April 2014
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
  
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
   
       
Today