Monday Oct 01, 2012

Oracle TimesTen In-Memory Database Performance on SPARC T4-2

The Oracle TimesTen In-Memory Database is optimized to run on Oracle's SPARC T4 processor platforms running Oracle Solaris 11 providing unsurpassed scalability, performance, upgradability, protection of investment and return on investment. The following demonstrate the value of combining Oracle TimesTen In-Memory Database with SPARC T4 servers and Oracle Solaris 11:

On a Mobile Call Processing test, the 2-socket SPARC T4-2 server outperforms:

  • Oracle's SPARC Enterprise M4000 server (4 x 2.66 GHz SPARC64 VII+) by 34%.

  • Oracle's SPARC T3-4 (4 x 1.65 GHz SPARC T3) by 2.7x, or 5.4x per processor.

Utilizing the TimesTen Performance Throughput Benchmark (TPTBM), the SPARC T4-2 server protects investments with:

  • 2.1x the overall performance of a 4-socket SPARC Enterprise M4000 server in read-only mode and 1.5x the performance in update-only testing. This is 4.2x more performance per processor than the SPARC64 VII+ 2.66 GHz based system.

  • 10x more performance per processor than the SPARC T2+ 1.4 GHz server.

  • 1.6x better performance per processor than the SPARC T3 1.65 GHz based server.

In replication testing, the two socket SPARC T4-2 server is over 3x faster than the performance of a four socket SPARC Enterprise T5440 server in both asynchronous replication environment and the highly available 2-Safe replication. This testing emphasizes parallel replication between systems.

Performance Landscape

Mobile Call Processing Test Performance

System Processor Sockets/Cores Tps Tps/
Socket
SPARC T4-2 SPARC T4, 2.85 GHz 2 16 218,400 109,200
M4000 SPARC64 VII+, 2.66 GHz 4 16 162,900 40,725
SPARC T3-4 SPARC T3, 1.65 GHz 4 64 80,400 20,100

TimesTen Performance Throughput Benchmark (TPTBM) Read-Only

System Processor Sockets/Cores Tps Tps/
Socket
SPARC T4-2 SPARC T4, 2.85 GHz 2 16 6.5M 3.3M
SPARC T3-4 SPARC T3, 1.65 GHz 4 64 7.9M 2.0M
M4000 SPARC64 VII+, 2.66 GHz 4 16 3.1M 0.8M
T5440 SPARC T2+, 1.4 GHz 4 32 3.1M 0.8M

TimesTen Performance Throughput Benchmark (TPTBM) Update-Only

System Processor Sockets/Cores Tps Tps/
Socket
SPARC T4-2 SPARC T4, 2.85 GHz 2 16 547,800 273,900
M4000 SPARC64 VII+, 2.66 GHz 4 16 363,800 90,950
SPARC T3-4 SPARC T3, 1.65 GHz 4 64 240,250 60,125

TimesTen Replication Tests

System Processor Sockets/Cores Asynchronous 2-Safe
SPARC T4-2 SPARC T4, 2.85 GHz 2 16 38,024 13,701
SPARC T5440 SPARC T2+, 1.4 GHz 4 32 11,621 4,615

Configuration Summary

Hardware Configurations:

SPARC T4-2 server
2 x SPARC T4 processors, 2.85 GHz
256 GB memory
1 x 8 Gbs FC Qlogic HBA
1 x 6 Gbs SAS HBA
4 x 300 GB internal disks
Sun Storage F5100 Flash Array (40 x 24 GB flash modules)
1 x Sun Fire X4275 server configured as COMSTAR head

SPARC T3-4 server
4 x SPARC T3 processors, 1.6 GHz
512 GB memory
1 x 8 Gbs FC Qlogic HBA
8 x 146 GB internal disks
1 x Sun Fire X4275 server configured as COMSTAR head

SPARC Enterprise M4000 server
4 x SPARC64 VII+ processors, 2.66 GHz
128 GB memory
1 x 8 Gbs FC Qlogic HBA
1 x 6 Gbs SAS HBA
2 x 146 GB internal disks
Sun Storage F5100 Flash Array (40 x 24 GB flash modules)
1 x Sun Fire X4275 server configured as COMSTAR head

Software Configuration:

Oracle Solaris 11 11/11
Oracle TimesTen 11.2.2.4

Benchmark Descriptions

TimesTen Performance Throughput BenchMark (TPTBM) is shipped with TimesTen and measures the total throughput of the system. The workload can test read-only, update-only, delete and insert operations as required.

Mobile Call Processing is a customer-based workload for processing calls made by mobile phone subscribers. The workload has a mixture of read-only, update, and insert-only transactions. The peak throughput performance is measured from multiple concurrent processes executing the transactions until a peak performance is reached via saturation of the available resources.

Parallel Replication tests using both asynchronous and 2-Safe replication methods. For asynchronous replication, transactions are processed in batches to maximize the throughput capabilities of the replication server and network. In 2-Safe replication, also known as no data-loss or high availability, transactions are replicated between servers immediately emphasizing low latency. For both environments, performance is measured in the number of parallel replication servers and the maximum transactions-per-second for all concurrent processes.

See Also

Disclosure Statement

Copyright 2012, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Oracle and Java are registered trademarks of Oracle and/or its affiliates. Other names may be trademarks of their respective owners. Results as of 1 October 2012.

Tuesday Aug 28, 2012

SPARC T4-2 Produces World Record Oracle Essbase Aggregate Storage Benchmark Result

Significance of Results

Oracle's SPARC T4-2 server configured with a Sun Storage F5100 Flash Array and running Oracle Solaris 10 with Oracle Database 11g has achieved exceptional performance for the Oracle Essbase Aggregate Storage Option benchmark. The benchmark has upwards of 1 billion records, 15 dimensions and millions of members. Oracle Essbase is a multi-dimensional online analytical processing (OLAP) server and is well-suited to work well with SPARC T4 servers.

  • The SPARC T4-2 server (2 cpus) running Oracle Essbase 11.1.2.2.100 outperformed the previous published results on Oracle's SPARC Enterprise M5000 server (4 cpus) with Oracle Essbase 11.1.1.3 on Oracle Solaris 10 by 80%, 32% and 2x performance improvement on Data Loading, Default Aggregation and Usage Based Aggregation, respectively.

  • The SPARC T4-2 server with Sun Storage F5100 Flash Array and Oracle Essbase running on Oracle Solaris 10 achieves sub-second query response times for 20,000 users in a 15 dimension database.

  • The SPARC T4-2 server configured with Oracle Essbase was able to aggregate and store values in the database for a 15 dimension cube in 398 minutes with 16 threads and in 484 minutes with 8 threads.

  • The Sun Storage F5100 Flash Array provides more than a 20% improvement out-of-the-box compared to a mid-size fiber channel disk array for default aggregation and user-based aggregation.

  • The Sun Storage F5100 Flash Array with Oracle Essbase provides the best combination for large Oracle Essbase databases leveraging Oracle Solaris ZFS and taking advantage of high bandwidth for faster load and aggregation.

  • Oracle Fusion Middleware provides a family of complete, integrated, hot pluggable and best-of-breed products known for enabling enterprise customers to create and run agile and intelligent business applications. Oracle Essbase's performance demonstrates why so many customers rely on Oracle Fusion Middleware as their foundation for innovation.

Performance Landscape

System Data Size
(millions of items)
Database
Load
(minutes)
Default
Aggregation
(minutes)
Usage Based
Aggregation
(minutes)
SPARC T4-2, 2 x SPARC T4 2.85 GHz 1000 149 398* 55
Sun M5000, 4 x SPARC64 VII 2.53 GHz 1000 269 526 115
Sun M5000, 4 x SPARC64 VII 2.4 GHz 400 120 448 18

* – 398 mins with CALCPARALLEL set to 16; 484 mins with CALCPARALLEL threads set to 8

Configuration Summary

Hardware Configuration:

1 x SPARC T4-2
2 x 2.85 GHz SPARC T4 processors
128 GB memory
2 x 300 GB 10000 RPM SAS internal disks

Storage Configuration:

1 x Sun Storage F5100 Flash Array
40 x 24 GB flash modules
SAS HBA with 2 SAS channels
Data Storage Scheme Striped - RAID 0
Oracle Solaris ZFS

Software Configuration:

Oracle Solaris 10 8/11
Installer V 11.1.2.2.100
Oracle Essbase Client v 11.1.2.2.100
Oracle Essbase v 11.1.2.2.100
Oracle Essbase Administration services 64-bit
Oracle Database 11g Release 2 (11.2.0.3)
HP's Mercury Interactive QuickTest Professional 9.5.0

Benchmark Description

The objective of the Oracle Essbase Aggregate Storage Option benchmark is to showcase the ability of Oracle Essbase to scale in terms of user population and data volume for large enterprise deployments. Typical administrative and end-user operations for OLAP applications were simulated to produce benchmark results.

The benchmark test results include:

  • Database Load: Time elapsed to build a database including outline and data load.
  • Default Aggregation: Time elapsed to build aggregation.
  • User Based Aggregation: Time elapsed of the aggregate views proposed as a result of tracked retrieval queries.

Summary of the data used for this benchmark:

  • 40 flat files, each of size 1.2 GB, 49.4 GB in total
  • 10 million rows per file, 1 billion rows total
  • 28 columns of data per row
  • Database outline has 15 dimensions (five of them are attribute dimensions)
  • Customer dimension has 13.3 million members
  • 3 rule files

Key Points and Best Practices

  • The Sun Storage F5100 Flash Array has been used to accelerate the application performance.

  • Setting data load threads (DLTHREADSPREPARE) to 64 and Load Buffer to 6 improved dataloading by about 9%.

  • Factors influencing aggregation materialization performance are "Aggregate Storage Cache" and "Number of Threads" (CALCPARALLEL) for parallel view materialization. The optimal values for this workload on the SPARC T4-2 server were:

      Aggregate Storage Cache: 32 GB
      CALCPARALLEL: 16

     

See Also

Disclosure Statement

Copyright 2012, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Oracle and Java are registered trademarks of Oracle and/or its affiliates. Other names may be trademarks of their respective owners. Results as of 28 August 2012.

Tuesday May 01, 2012

SPARC T4 Servers Running Oracle Solaris 11 and Oracle RAC Deliver World Record on PeopleSoft HRMS 9.1

Oracle's SPARC T4-4 server running Oracle's PeopleSoft HRMS Self-Service 9.1 benchmark achieved world record performance with 18,000 interactive users. This was accomplished using a high availability configuration using Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) 11g Release 2 software for the database tier running on Oracle Solaris 11. The benchmark configuration included the SPARC T4-4 server for the application tier, a SPARC T4-2 server for the web tier and two SPARC T4-2 servers for the database tier.

  • The combination of the SPARC T4 servers running PeopleSoft HRSS 9.1 benchmark supports 4.5x the number of users an IBM pSeries 570 running PeopleSoft HRSS 8.9, with an average response time 40 percent better than IBM.

  • This result was obtained with two SPARC T4-2 servers running the database service using Oracle Real Application Clusters 11g Release 2 software in a high availability configuration.

  • The two SPARC T4-2 servers in the database tier used Oracle Solaris 11, and Oracle RAC 11g Release 2 software with database shared disk storage managed by Oracle Automatic Storage Management (ASM).

  • The average CPU utilization on one SPARC T4-4 server in the application tier handling 18,000 users is 54 percent, showing significant headroom for growth.

  • The SPARC T4 server for the application tier used Oracle Solaris Containers on Oracle Solaris 10, which provides a flexible, scalable and manageable virtualized environment.

  • The Peoplesoft HRMS Self-Service benchmark demonstrates better performance on Oracle hardware and software, engineered to work together, than Oracle software on IBM.

Performance Landscape

PeopleSoft HRMS Self-Service 9.1 Benchmark
Systems Processors Users Ave Response -
Search (sec)
Ave Response -
Save (sec)
SPARC T4-2 (web)
SPARC T4-4 (app)
2 x SPARC T4-2 (db)
2 x SPARC T4, 2.85 GHz
4 x SPARC T4, 3.0 GHz
2 x (2 x SPARC T4, 2.85 GHz)
18,000 1.048 0.742
SPARC T4-2 (web)
SPARC T4-4 (app)
SPARC T4-4 (db)
2 x SPARC T4, 2.85 GHz
4 x SPARC T4, 3.0 GHz
4 x SPARC T4, 3.0 GHz
15,000 1.01 0.63
PeopleSoft HRMS Self-Service 8.9 Benchmark
IBM Power 570 (web/app)
IBM Power 570 (db)
12 x POWER5, 1.9 GHz
4 x POWER5, 1.9 GHz
4,000 1.74 1.25
IBM p690 (web)
IBM p690 (app)
IBM p690 (db)
4 x POWER4, 1.9 GHz
12 x POWER4, 1.9 GHz
6 x 4392 MIPS/Gen1
4,000 1.35 1.01

The main differences between version 9.1 and version 8.9 of the benchmark are:

  • the database expanded from 100K employees and 20K managers to 500K employees and 100K managers,
  • the manager data was expanded,
  • a new transaction, "Employee Add Profile," was added, the percent of users executing it is less then 2%, and the transaction has a heavier footprint,
  • version 9.1 has a different benchmark metric (Average Response Search/Save time for x number of users) versus single user search/save time,
  • newer versions of the PeopleSoft application and PeopleTools software are used.

Configuration Summary

Application Server:

1 x SPARC T4-4 server
4 x SPARC T4 processors 3.0 GHz
512 GB main memory
5 x 300 GB SAS internal disks,
2 x 100 GB internal SSDs
1 x 300 GB internal SSD
Oracle Solaris 10 8/11
PeopleSoft PeopleTools 8.51.02
PeopleSoft HCM 9.1
Oracle Tuxedo, Version 10.3.0.0, 64-bit, Patch Level 031
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM on Solaris, version 1.6.0_20

Web Server:

1 x SPARC T4-2 server
2 x SPARC T4 processors 2.85 GHz
256 GB main memory
2 x 300 GB SAS internal disks
1 x 100 GB internal SSD
Oracle Solaris 10 8/11
PeopleSoft PeopleTools 8.51.02
Oracle WebLogic Server 11g (10.3.3)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM on Solaris, version 1.6.0_20

Database Server:

2 x SPARC T4-2 servers, each with
2 x SPARC T4 processors 2.85 GHz
128 GB main memory
3 x 300 GB SAS internal disks
Oracle Solaris 11 11/11
Oracle Database 11g Release 2
Oracle Real Application Clusters

Database Storage:

Data
1 x Sun Storage F5100 Flash Array (80 flash modules)
1 x COMSTAR Sun Fire X4470 M2 server
4 x Intel Xeon X7550 processors 2.0 GHz
128 GB main memory
Oracle Solaris 11 11/11
Redo
2 x COMSTAR Sun Fire X4275 servers, each with
1 x Intel Xeon E5540 processor 2.53 GHz
6 GB main memory)
12 x 2 TB SAS disks
Oracle Solaris 11 Express 2010.11

Connectivity:

1 x 8-port 10GbE switch
1 x 24-port 1GbE switch
1 x 32-port Brocade FC switch

Benchmark Description

The purpose of the PeopleSoft HRMS Self-Service 9.1 benchmark is to measure comparative online performance of the selected processes in PeopleSoft Enterprise HCM 9.1 with Oracle Database 11g. The benchmark kit is an Oracle standard benchmark kit run by all platform vendors to measure the performance. It is an OLTP benchmark with no dependency on remote COBOL calls, there is no batch workload, and DB SQLs are moderately complex. The results are certified by Oracle and a white paper is published.

PeopleSoft defines a business transaction as a series of HTML pages that guide a user through a particular scenario. Users are defined as corporate Employees, Managers and HR administrators. The benchmark consists of 14 scenarios which emulate users performing typical HCM transactions such as viewing paychecks, promoting and hiring employees, updating employee profiles and other typical HCM application transactions.

All of these transactions are well defined in the PeopleSoft HR Self-Service 9.1 benchmark kit. This benchmark metric is the Weighted Average Response search/save time for all users.

Key Points and Best Practices

  • The combined processing power of two SPARC T4-2 servers running the highly available Oracle RAC database can provide greater throughput and Oracle RAC scalability than is available from a single server.

  • All database data files/recovery files and Oracle Clusterware files were created with Oracle Automatic Storage Management (Oracle ASM) volume manager and file system which resulted in equivalent performance of conventional volume managers, file systems, and raw devices, but with the added benefit of the ease of management provided by Oracle ASM integrated storage management solution.

  • Five Oracle PeopleSoft Domains with 200 application servers (40 per each Domain) on the SPARC T4-4 server were hosted in two separate Oracle Solaris Containers for a total of 10 Domains/400 application servers processes to demonstrate consolidation of multiple application servers, ease of administration and load balancing.

  • Each Oracle Solaris Container was bound to a separate processor set, each containing 124 virtual processors. The default set (composed of 4 virtual processors from first and third processor socket, total of 8 virtual processors) was used for network and disk interrupt handling. This was done to improve performance by reducing memory access latency by using the physical memory closest to the processors and offload I/O interrupt handling to default set virtual processors, freeing up processing resources for application server virtual processors.

See Also

Disclosure Statement

Oracle's PeopleSoft HRMS 9.1 benchmark, www.oracle.com/us/solutions/benchmark/apps-benchmark/peoplesoft-167486.html, results 5/1/2012.

Thursday Apr 19, 2012

Sun ZFS Storage 7420 Appliance Delivers 2-Node World Record SPECsfs2008 NFS Benchmark

Oracle's Sun ZFS Storage 7420 appliance delivered world record two-node performance on the SPECsfs2008 NFS benchmark, beating results published on NetApp's dual-controller and 4-node high-end FAS6240 storage systems.

  • The Sun ZFS Storage 7420 appliance delivered a world record two-node result of 267,928 SPECsfs2008_nfs.v3 Ops/sec with an Overall Response Time (ORT) of 1.31 msec on the SPECsfs2008 NFS benchmark.

  • The Sun ZFS Storage 7420 appliance delivered 1.4x higher throughput than the dual-controller NetApp FAS6240 and 2.6x higher throughput than the dual-controller NetApp FAS3270 on the SPECsfs2008_nfs.v3 benchmark at less than half the list price of either result.

  • The Sun ZFS Storage 7420 appliance required 10 percent less rack space than the dual-controller NetApp FAS6240.

  • The Sun ZFS Storage 7420 appliance had 3 percent higher throughput than the 4-node NetApp FAS6240 on the SPECsfs2008_nfs.v3 benchmark.

  • The Sun ZFS Storage 7420 appliance required 25 percent less rack space than the 4-node NetApp FAS6240.

  • The Sun ZFS Storage 7420 appliance has 14 percent better Overall Response Time than the 4-node NetApp FAS6240 on the SPECsfs2008_nfs.v3 benchmark.

Performance Landscape

SPECsfs2008_nfs.v3 Performance Chart (in decreasing SPECsfs2008_nfs.v3 Ops/sec order)

Sponsor System Throughput
(Ops/sec)
Overall Response
Time (msec)
Nodes Memory (GB)
Including Flash
Disks Rack Units –
Controllers
+Disks
Oracle 7420 267,928 1.31 2 6,728 280 54
NetApp FAS6240 260,388 1.53 4 2,256 288 72
NetApp FAS6240 190,675 1.17 2 1,128 288 60
EMC VG8 135,521 1.92 280 312
Oracle 7320 134,140 1.51 2 4,968 136 26
EMC NS-G8 110,621 2.32 264 100
NetApp FAS3270 101,183 1.66 2 40 360 66

Throughput SPECsfs2008_nfs.v3 Ops/sec — the Performance Metric
Overall Response Time — the corresponding Response Time Metric
Nodes — Nodes and Controllers are being used interchangeably

Complete SPECsfs2008 benchmark results may be found at http://www.spec.org/sfs2008/results/sfs2008.html.

Configuration Summary

Storage Configuration:

Sun ZFS Storage 7420 appliance in clustered configuration
2 x Sun ZFS Storage 7420 controllers, each with
4 x 2.4 GHz Intel Xeon E7-4870 processors
1 TB memory
4 x 512 GB SSD flash-enabled read-cache
2 x 10GbE NICs
12 x Sun Disk shelves
10 x shelves with 24 x 300 GB 15K RPM SAS-2 drives
2 x shelves with 20 x 300 GB 15K RPM SAS-2 drives and 4 x 73 GB SAS-2 flash-enabled write-cache

Server Configuration:

4 x Sun Fire X4270 M2 servers, each with
2 x 3.3 GHz Intel Xeon E5680 processors
144 GB memory
1 x 10 GbE NIC
Oracle Solaris 10 9/10

Switches:

1 x 24-port 10Gb Ethernet Switch

Benchmark Description

SPECsfs2008 is the latest version of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation (SPEC) benchmark suite measuring file server throughput and response time, providing a standardized method for comparing performance across different vendor platforms. SPECsfs2008 results summarize the server's capabilities with respect to the number of operations that can be handled per second, as well as the overall latency of the operations. The suite is a follow-on to the SFS97_R1 benchmark, adding a CIFS workload, an updated NFSv3 workload, support for additional client platforms, and a new test harness and reporting/submission framework.

See Also

Disclosure Statement

SPEC and SPECsfs are registered trademarks of Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation (SPEC). Results as of April 18, 2012, for more information see www.spec.org. Sun ZFS Storage 7420 Appliance 267,928 SPECsfs2008_nfs.v3 Ops/sec, 1.31 msec ORT, NetApp Data ONTAP 8.1 Cluster-Mode (4-node FAS6240) 260,388 SPECsfs2008_nfs.v3 Ops/Sec, 1.53 msec ORT, NetApp FAS6240 190,675 SPECsfs2008_nfs.v3 Ops/Sec, 1.17 msec ORT. NetApp FAS3270 101,183 SPECsfs2008_nfs.v3 Ops/Sec, 1.66 msec ORT.

Nodes refer to the item in the SPECsfs2008 disclosed Configuration Bill of Materials that have the Processing Elements that perform the NFS Processing Function. These are the first item listed in each of disclosed Configuration Bill of Materials except for EMC where it is both the first and third items listed, and HP, where it is the second item listed as Blade Servers. The number of nodes is from the QTY disclosed in the Configuration Bill of Materials as described above. Configuration Bill of Materials list price for Oracle result of US$ 423,644. Configuration Bill of Materials list price for NetApp FAS3270 result of US$ 1,215,290. Configuration Bill of Materials list price for NetApp FAS6240 result of US$ 1,028,118. Oracle pricing from https://shop.oracle.com/pls/ostore/f?p=dstore:home:0, traverse to "Storage and Tape" and then to "NAS Storage". NetApp's pricing from http://www.netapp.com/us/media/na-list-usd-netapp-custom-state-new-discounts.html.

Sunday Apr 15, 2012

Sun ZFS Storage 7420 Appliance Delivers Top High-End Price/Performance Result for SPC-2 Benchmark

Oracle's Sun ZFS Storage 7420 appliance delivered leading high-end price/performance on the SPC Benchmark 2 (SPC-2).

  • The Sun ZFS Storage 7420 appliance delivered a result of 10,704 SPC-2 MB/s at $35.24 $/SPC-2 MB/s on the SPC-2 benchmark.

  • The Sun ZFS Storage 7420 appliance beats the IBM DS8800 result by over 10% on SPC-2 MB/s and has 7.7x better $/SPC-2 MB/s.

  • The Sun ZFS Storage 7420 appliance achieved the best price/performance for the top 18 posted unique performance results on the SPC-2 benchmark.

Performance Landscape

SPC-2 Performance Chart (in decreasing performance order)

System SPC-2
MB/s
$/SPC-2
MB/s
ASU
Capacity
(GB)
TSC Price Data
Protection
Level
Date Results
Identifier
HP StorageWorks P9500 13,148 $88.34 129,112 $1,161,504 RAID-5 03/07/12 B00056
Sun ZFS Storage 7420 10,704 $35.24 31,884 $377,225 Mirroring 04/12/12 B00058
IBM DS8800 9,706 $270.38 71,537 $2,624,257 RAID-5 12/01/10 B00051
HP XP24000 8,725 $187.45 18,401 $1,635,434 Mirroring 09/08/08 B00035
Hitachi Storage Platform V 8,725 $187.49 18,401 $1,635,770 Mirroring 09/08/08 B00036
TMS RamSan-630 8,323 $49.37 8,117 $410,927 RAID-5 05/10/11 B00054
IBM XIV 7,468 $152.34 154,619 $1,137,641 RAID-1 10/19/11 BE00001
IBM DS8700 7,247 $277.22 32,642 $2,009,007 RAID-5 11/30/09 B00049
IBM SAN Vol Ctlr 4.2 7,084 $463.66 101,155 $3,284,767 RAID-5 07/12/07 B00024
Fujitsu ETERNUS DX440 S2 5,768 $66.50 42,133 $383,576 Mirroring 04/12/12 B00057
IBM DS5300 5,634 $74.13 16,383 $417,648 RAID-5 10/21/09 B00045
Sun Storage 6780 5,634 $47.03 16,383 $264,999 RAID-5 10/28/09 B00047
IBM DS5300 5,544 $75.33 14,043 $417,648 RAID-6 10/21/09 B00046
Sun Storage 6780 5,544 $47.80 14,043 $264,999 RAID-6 10/28/09 B00048
IBM DS5300 4,818 $93.80 16,383 $451,986 RAID-5 09/25/08 B00037
Sun Storage 6780 4,818 $53.61 16,383 $258,329 RAID-5 02/02/09 B00039
IBM DS5300 4,676 $96.67 14,043 $451,986 RAID-6 09/25/08 B00038
Sun Storage 6780 4,676 $55.25 14,043 $258,329 RAID-6 02/03/09 B00040
IBM SAN Vol Ctlr 4.1 4,544 $400.78 51,265 $1,821,301 RAID-5 09/12/06 B00011
IBM SAN Vol Ctlr 3.1 3,518 $563.93 20,616 $1,983,785 Mirroring 12/14/05 B00001
Fujitsu ETERNUS8000 1100 3,481 $238.93 4,570 $831,649 Mirroring 03/08/07 B00019
IBM DS8300 3,218 $539.38 15,393 $1,735,473 Mirroring 12/14/05 B00006
IBM Storwize V7000 3,133 $71.32 29,914 $223,422 RAID-5 12/13/10 B00052

SPC-2 MB/s = the Performance Metric
$/SPC-2 MB/s = the Price/Performance Metric
ASU Capacity = the Capacity Metric
Data Protection = Data Protection Metric
TSC Price = Total Cost of Ownership Metric
Results Identifier = A unique identification of the result Metric

Complete SPC-2 benchmark results may be found at http://www.storageperformance.org.

Configuration Summary

Storage Configuration:

Sun ZFS Storage 7420 appliance in clustered configuration
2 x Sun ZFS Storage 7420 controllers, each with
4 x 2.0 GHz Intel Xeon X7550 processors
512 GB memory, 64 x 8 GB 1066 MHz DDR3 DIMMs
16 x Sun Disk shelves, each with
24 x 300 GB 15K RPM SAS-2 drives

Server Configuration:

1 x Sun Fire X4470 server, with
4 x 2.4 GHz Intel Xeon E7-4870 processors
512 GB memory
8 x 8 Gb FC connections to the Sun ZFS Storage 7420 appliance
Oracle Solaris 11 11/11

2 x Sun Fire X4470 servers, each with
4 x 2.4 GHz Intel Xeon E7-4870 processors
256 GB memory
8 x 8 Gb FC connections to the Sun ZFS Storage 7420 appliance
Oracle Solaris 11 11/11

Benchmark Description

SPC Benchmark-2 (SPC-2): Consists of three distinct workloads designed to demonstrate the performance of a storage subsystem during the execution of business critical applications that require the large-scale, sequential movement of data. Those applications are characterized predominately by large I/Os organized into one or more concurrent sequential patterns. A description of each of the three SPC-2 workloads is listed below as well as examples of applications characterized by each workload.

  • Large File Processing: Applications in a wide range of fields, which require simple sequential process of one or more large files such as scientific computing and large-scale financial processing.
  • Large Database Queries: Applications that involve scans or joins of large relational tables, such as those performed for data mining or business intelligence.
  • Video on Demand: Applications that provide individualized video entertainment to a community of subscribers by drawing from a digital film library.

SPC-2 is built to:

  • Provide a level playing field for test sponsors.
  • Produce results that are powerful and yet simple to use.
  • Provide value for engineers as well as IT consumers and solution integrators.
  • Is easy to run, easy to audit/verify, and easy to use to report official results.

See Also

Disclosure Statement

SPC-2, SPC-2 MB/s, $/SPC-2 MB/s are registered trademarks of Storage Performance Council (SPC). Results as of April 12, 2012, for more information see www.storageperformance.org. Sun ZFS Storage 7420 Appliance http://www.storageperformance.org/results/benchmark_results_spc2#b00058; IBM DS8800 http://www.storageperformance.org/results/benchmark_results_spc2#b00051.

Thursday Apr 12, 2012

Sun Fire X4270 M3 SAP Enhancement Package 4 for SAP ERP 6.0 (Unicode) Two-Tier Standard Sales and Distribution (SD) Benchmark

Oracle's Sun Fire X4270 M3 server (now known as Sun Server X3-2L) achieved 8,320 SAP SD Benchmark users running SAP enhancement package 4 for SAP ERP 6.0 with unicode software using Oracle Database 11g and Oracle Solaris 10.

  • The Sun Fire X4270 M3 server using Oracle Database 11g and Oracle Solaris 10 beat both IBM Flex System x240 and IBM System x3650 M4 server running DB2 9.7 and Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise Edition.

  • The Sun Fire X4270 M3 server running Oracle Database 11g and Oracle Solaris 10 beat the HP ProLiant BL460c Gen8 server using SQL Server 2008 and Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise Edition by 6%.

  • The Sun Fire X4270 M3 server using Oracle Database 11g and Oracle Solaris 10 beat Cisco UCS C240 M3 server running SQL Server 2008 and Windows Server 2008 R2 Datacenter Edition by 9%.

  • The Sun Fire X4270 M3 server running Oracle Database 11g and Oracle Solaris 10 beat the Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S7 server using SQL Server 2008 and Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise Edition by 10%.

Performance Landscape

SAP-SD 2-Tier Performance Table (in decreasing performance order).

SAP ERP 6.0 Enhancement Pack 4 (Unicode) Results
(benchmark version from January 2009 to April 2012)

System OS
Database
Users SAP
ERP/ECC
Release
SAPS SAPS/
Proc
Date
Sun Fire X4270 M3
2xIntel Xeon E5-2690 @2.90GHz
128 GB
Oracle Solaris 10
Oracle Database 11g
8,320 2009
6.0 EP4
(Unicode)
45,570 22,785 10-Apr-12
IBM Flex System x240
2xIntel Xeon E5-2690 @2.90GHz
128 GB
Windows Server 2008 R2 EE
DB2 9.7
7,960 2009
6.0 EP4
(Unicode)
43,520 21,760 11-Apr-12
HP ProLiant BL460c Gen8
2xIntel Xeon E5-2690 @2.90GHz
128 GB
Windows Server 2008 R2 EE
SQL Server 2008
7,865 2009
6.0 EP4
(Unicode)
42,920 21,460 29-Mar-12
IBM System x3650 M4
2xIntel Xeon E5-2690 @2.90GHz
128 GB
Windows Server 2008 R2 EE
DB2 9.7
7,855 2009
6.0 EP4
(Unicode)
42,880 21,440 06-Mar-12
Cisco UCS C240 M3
2xIntel Xeon E5-2690 @2.90GHz
128 GB
Windows Server 2008 R2 DE
SQL Server 2008
7,635 2009
6.0 EP4
(Unicode)
41,800 20,900 06-Mar-12
Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S7
2xIntel Xeon E5-2690 @2.90GHz
128 GB
Windows Server 2008 R2 EE
SQL Server 2008
7,570 2009
6.0 EP4
(Unicode)
41,320 20,660 06-Mar-12

Complete benchmark results may be found at the SAP benchmark website http://www.sap.com/benchmark.

Configuration and Results Summary

Hardware Configuration:

Sun Fire X4270 M3
2 x 2.90 GHz Intel Xeon E5-2690 processors
128 GB memory
Sun StorageTek 6540 with 4 * 16 * 300GB 15Krpm 4Gb FC-AL

Software Configuration:

Oracle Solaris 10
Oracle Database 11g
SAP enhancement package 4 for SAP ERP 6.0 (Unicode)

Certified Results (published by SAP):

Number of benchmark users:
8,320
Average dialog response time:
0.95 seconds
Throughput:

Fully processed order line:
911,330

Dialog steps/hour:
2,734,000

SAPS:
45,570
SAP Certification:
2012014

Benchmark Description

The SAP Standard Application SD (Sales and Distribution) Benchmark is a two-tier ERP business test that is indicative of full business workloads of complete order processing and invoice processing, and demonstrates the ability to run both the application and database software on a single system. The SAP Standard Application SD Benchmark represents the critical tasks performed in real-world ERP business environments.

SAP is one of the premier world-wide ERP application providers, and maintains a suite of benchmark tests to demonstrate the performance of competitive systems on the various SAP products.

See Also

Disclosure Statement

Two-tier SAP Sales and Distribution (SD) standard SAP SD benchmark based on SAP enhancement package 4 for SAP ERP 6.0 (Unicode) application benchmark as of 04/11/12: Sun Fire X4270 M3 (2 processors, 16 cores, 32 threads) 8,320 SAP SD Users, 2 x 2.90 GHz Intel Xeon E5-2690, 128 GB memory, Oracle 11g, Solaris 10, Cert# 2012014. IBM Flex System x240 (2 processors, 16 cores, 32 threads) 7,960 SAP SD Users, 2 x 2.90 GHz Intel Xeon E5-2690, 128 GB memory, DB2 9.7, Windows Server 2008 R2 EE, Cert# 2012016. IBM System x3650 M4 (2 processors, 16 cores, 32 threads) 7,855 SAP SD Users, 2 x 2.90 GHz Intel Xeon E5-2690, 128 GB memory, DB2 9.7, Windows Server 2008 R2 EE, Cert# 2012010. Cisco UCS C240 M3 (2 processors, 16 cores, 32 threads) 7,635 SAP SD Users, 2 x 2.90 GHz Intel Xeon E5-2690, 128 GB memory, SQL Server 2008, Windows Server 2008 R2 DE, Cert# 2012011. Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S7 (2 processors, 16 cores, 32 threads) 7,570 SAP SD Users, 2 x 2.90 GHz Intel Xeon E5-2690, 128 GB memory, SQL Server 2008, Windows Server 2008 R2 EE, Cert# 2012008. HP ProLiant DL380p Gen8 (2 processors, 16 cores, 32 threads) 7,865 SAP SD Users, 2 x 2.90 GHz Intel Xeon E5-2690, 128 GB memory, SQL Server 2008, Windows Server 2008 R2 EE, Cert# 2012012.

SAP, R/3, reg TM of SAP AG in Germany and other countries. More info www.sap.com/benchmark

Tuesday Apr 10, 2012

World Record Oracle E-Business Suite 12.1.3 Standard Extra-Large Payroll (Batch) Benchmark on Sun Server X3-2L

Oracle's Sun Server X3-2L (formerly Sun Fire X4270 M3) server set a world record running the Oracle E-Business Suite 12.1.3 Standard Extra-Large Payroll (Batch) benchmark.

  • This is the first published result using Oracle E-Business 12.1.3.

  • The Sun Server X3-2L result ran the Extra-Large Payroll workload in 19 minutes.

Performance Landscape

This is the first published result for the Payroll Extra-Large model using Oracle E-Business 12.1.3 benchmark.

Batch Workload: Payroll Extra-Large Model
System Employees/Hr Elapsed Time
Sun Server X3-2L 789,515 19 minutes

Configuration Summary

Hardware Configuration:

Sun Server X3-2L
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2690, 2.9 GHz
128 GB memory
8 x 100 GB SSD for data
1 x 300 GB SSD for log

Software Configuration:

Oracle Linux 5.7
Oracle E-Business Suite R12 (12.1.3)
Oracle Database 11g (11.2.0.3)

Benchmark Description

The Oracle E-Business Suite Standard R12 Benchmark combines online transaction execution by simulated users with concurrent batch processing to model a typical scenario for a global enterprise. This benchmark ran one Batch component, Payroll, in the Extra-Large size. The goal of the benchmark proposal is to execute and achieve best batch-payroll performance using X-Large configuragion.

Results can be published in four sizes and use one or more online/batch modules

  • X-large: Maximum online users running all business flows between 10,000 to 20,000; 750,000 order to cash lines per hour and 250,000 payroll checks per hour.
    • Order to Cash Online -- 2400 users
      • The percentage across the 5 transactions in Order Management module is:
        • Insert Manual Invoice -- 16.66%
        • Insert Order -- 32.33%
        • Order Pick Release -- 16.66%
        • Ship Confirm -- 16.66%
        • Order Summary Report -- 16.66%
    • HR Self-Service -- 4000 users
    • Customer Support Flow -- 8000 users
    • Procure to Pay -- 2000 users
  • Large: 10,000 online users; 100,000 order to cash lines per hour and 100,000 payroll checks per hour.
  • Medium: up to 3000 online users; 50,000 order to cash lines per hour and 10,000 payroll checks per hour.
  • Small: up to 1000 online users; 10,000 order to cash lines per hour and 5,000 payroll checks per hour.

See Also

Disclosure Statement

Oracle E-Business X-Large Batch-Payroll benchmark, Sun Server X3-2L, 2.90 GHz, 2 chips, 16 cores, 32 threads, 128 GB memory, elapsed time 19.0 minutes, 789,515 Employees/HR, Oracle Linux 5.7, Oracle E-Business Suite 12.1.3, Oracle Database 11g Release 2, Results as of 7/10/2012.

SPEC CPU2006 Results on Oracle's Sun x86 Servers

Oracle's new Sun x86 servers delivered world records on the benchmarks SPECfp2006 and SPECint_rate2006 for two processor servers. This was accomplished with Oracle Solaris 11 and Oracle Solaris Studio 12.3 software.

  • The Sun Fire X4170 M3 (now known as Sun Server X3-2) server achieved a world record result in for SPECfp2006 benchmark with a score of 96.8.

  • The Sun Blade X6270 M3 server module (now known as Sun Blade X3-2B) produced best integer throughput performance for all 2-socket servers with a SPECint_rate2006 score of 705.

  • The Sun x86 servers with Intel Xeon E5-2690 2.9 GHz processors produced a cross-generational performance improvement up to 1.8x over the previous generation, Sun x86 M2 servers.

Performance Landscape

Complete benchmark results are at the SPEC website, SPEC CPU2006 Results. The tables below provide the new Oracle results, as well as, select results from other vendors.

SPECint2006
System Processor c/c/t * Peak Base O/S Compiler
Fujitsu PRIMERGY BX924 S3 Intel E5-2690, 2.9 GHz 2/16/16 60.8 56.0 RHEL 6.2 Intel 12.1.2.273
Sun Fire X4170 M3 Intel E5-2690, 2.9 GHz 2/16/32 58.5 54.3 Oracle Linux 6.1 Intel 12.1.0.225
Sun Fire X4270 M2 Intel X5690, 3.47 GHz 2/12/12 46.2 43.9 Oracle Linux 5.5 Intel 12.0.1.116

SPECfp2006
System Processor c/c/t * Peak Base O/S Compiler
Sun Fire X4170 M3 Intel E5-2690, 2.9 GHz 2/16/32 96.8 86.4 Oracle Solaris 11 Studio 12.3
Sun Blade X6270 M3 Intel E5-2690, 2.9 GHz 2/16/32 96.0 85.2 Oracle Solaris 11 Studio 12.3
Sun Fire X4270 M3 Intel E5-2690, 2.9 GHz 2/16/32 95.9 85.1 Oracle Solaris 11 Studio 12.3
Fujitsu CELSIUS R920 Intel E5-2687, 2.9 GHz 2/16/16 93.8 87.6 RHEL 6.1 Intel 12.1.2.273
Sun Fire X4270 M2 Intel X5690, 3.47 GHz 2/12/24 64.2 59.2 Oracle Solaris 10 Studio 12.2

Only 2-chip server systems listed below, excludes workstations.

SPECint_rate2006
System Processor Base
Copies
c/c/t * Peak Base O/S Compiler
Sun Blade X6270 M3 Intel E5-2690, 2.9 GHz 32 2/16/32 705 632 Oracle Solaris 11 Studio 12.3
Sun Fire X4270 M3 Intel E5-2690, 2.9 GHz 32 2/16/32 705 630 Oracle Solaris 11 Studio 12.3
Sun Fire X4170 M3 Intel E5-2690, 2.9 GHz 32 2/16/32 702 628 Oracle Solaris 11 Studio 12.3
Cisco UCS C220 M3 Intel E5-2690, 2.9 GHz 32 2/16/32 697 671 RHEL 6.2 Intel 12.1.0.225
Sun Blade X6270 M2 Intel X5690, 3.47 GHz 24 2/12/24 410 386 Oracle Linux 5.5 Intel 12.0.1.116

SPECfp_rate2006
System Processor Base
Copies
c/c/t * Peak Base O/S Compiler
Cisco UCS C240 M3 Intel E5-2690, 2.9 GHz 32 2/16/32 510 496 RHEL 6.2 Intel 12.1.2.273
Sun Fire X4270 M3 Intel E5-2690, 2.9 GHz 64 2/16/32 497 461 Oracle Solaris 11 Studio 12.3
Sun Blade X6270 M3 Intel E5-2690, 2.9 GHz 32 2/16/32 497 460 Oracle Solaris 11 Studio 12.3
Sun Fire X4170 M3 Intel E5-2690, 2.9 GHz 64 2/16/32 495 464 Oracle Solaris 11 Studio 12.3
Sun Fire X4270 M2 Intel E5690, 3.47 GHz 24 2/12/24 273 265 Oracle Linux 5.5 Intel 12.0.1.116

* c/c/t — chips / cores / threads enabled

Configuration Summary and Results

Hardware Configuration:

Sun Fire X4170 M3 server
2 x 2.90 GHz Intel Xeon E5-2690 processors
128 GB memory (16 x 8 GB 2Rx4 PC3-12800R-11, ECC)

Sun Fire X4270 M3 server
2 x 2.90 GHz Intel Xeon E5-2690 processors
128 GB memory (16 x 8 GB 2Rx4 PC3-12800R-11, ECC)

Sun Blade X6270 M3 server module
2 x 2.90 GHz Intel Xeon E5-2690 processors
128 GB memory (16 x 8 GB 2Rx4 PC3-12800R-11, ECC)

Software Configuration:

Oracle Solaris 11 11/11 (SRU2)
Oracle Solaris Studio 12.3 (patch update 1 nightly build 120313) Oracle Linux Server Release 6.1
Intel C++ Studio XE 12.1.0.225
SPEC CPU2006 V1.2

Benchmark Description

SPEC CPU2006 is SPEC's most popular benchmark. It measures:

  • Speed — single copy performance of chip, memory, compiler
  • Rate — multiple copy (throughput)

The benchmark is also divided into integer intensive applications and floating point intensive applications:

  • integer: 12 benchmarks derived from real applications such as perl, gcc, XML processing, and pathfinding
  • floating point: 17 benchmarks derived from real applications, including chemistry, physics, genetics, and weather.

It is also divided depending upon the amount of optimization allowed:

  • base: optimization is consistent per compiled language, all benchmarks must be compiled with the same flags per language.
  • peak: specific compiler optimization is allowed per application.

The overall metrics for the benchmark which are commonly used are:

  • SPECint_rate2006, SPECint_rate_base2006: integer, rate
  • SPECfp_rate2006, SPECfp_rate_base2006: floating point, rate
  • SPECint2006, SPECint_base2006: integer, speed
  • SPECfp2006, SPECfp_base2006: floating point, speed

See here for additional information.

See Also

Disclosure Statement

SPEC and the benchmark names SPECfp and SPECint are registered trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. Results as of 10 April 2012 from www.spec.org and this report.

SPEC CPU2006 Results on Oracle's Netra Server X3-2

Oracle's Netra Server X3-2 (formerly Sun Netra X4270 M3) equipped with the new Intel Xeon processor E5-2658, is up to 2.5x faster than the previous generation Netra systems on SPEC CPU2006 workloads.

Performance Landscape

Complete benchmark results are at the SPEC website, SPEC CPU2006 results. The tables below provide the new Oracle results and previous generation results.

SPECint2006
System Processor c/c/t * Peak Base O/S Compiler
Netra Server X3-2
Intel E5-2658, 2.1 GHz 2/16/32 38.5 36.0 Oracle Linux 6.1 Intel 12.1.0.225
Sun Netra X4270 Intel L5518, 2.13 GHz 2/8/16 27.9 25.0 Oracle Linux 5.4 Intel 11.1
Sun Netra X4250 Intel L5408, 2.13 GHz 2/8/8 20.3 17.9 SLES 10 SP1 Intel 11.0

SPECfp2006
System Processor c/c/t * Peak Base O/S Compiler
Netra Server X3-2 Intel E5-2658, 2.1 GHz 2/16/32 65.3 61.6 Oracle Linux 6.1 Intel 12.1.0.225
Sun Netra X4270 Intel L5518, 2.13 GHz 2/8/16 32.5 29.4 Oracle Linux 5.4 Intel 11.1
Sun Netra X4250 Intel L5408, 2.13 GHz 2/8/8 18.5 17.7 SLES 10 SP1 Intel 11.0

SPECint_rate2006
System Processor Base
Copies
c/c/t * Peak Base O/S Compiler
Netra Server X3-2 Intel E5-2658, 2.1 GHz 32 2/16/32 477 455 Oracle Linux 6.1 Intel 12.1.0.225
Sun Netra X4270 Intel L5518, 2.13 GHz 16 2/8/16 201 189 Oracle Linux 5.4 Intel 11.1
Sun Netra X4250 Intel L5408, 2.13 GHz 8 2/8/8 103 82.0 SLES 10 SP1 Intel 11.0

SPECfp_rate2006
System Processor Base
Copies
c/c/t * Peak Base O/S Compiler
Netra Server X3-2 Intel E5-2658, 2.1 GHz 32 2/16/32 392 383 Oracle Linux 6.1 Intel 12.1.0.225
Sun Netra X4270 Intel L5518, 2.13 GHz 16 2/8/16 155 153 Oracle Linux 5.4 Intel 11.1
Sun Netra X4250 Intel L5408, 2.13 GHz 8 2/8/8 55.9 52.3 SLES 10 SP1 Intel 11.0

* c/c/t — chips / cores / threads enabled

Configuration Summary

Hardware Configuration:

Netra Server X3-2
2 x 2.10 GHz Intel Xeon E5-2658 processors
128 GB memory (16 x 8 GB 2Rx4 PC3-12800R-11, ECC)

Software Configuration:

Oracle Linux Server Release 6.1
Intel C++ Studio XE 12.1.0.225
SPEC CPU2006 V1.2

Benchmark Description

SPEC CPU2006 is SPEC's most popular benchmark. It measures:

  • Speed — single copy performance of chip, memory, compiler
  • Rate — multiple copy (throughput)

The benchmark is also divided into integer intensive applications and floating point intensive applications:

  • integer: 12 benchmarks derived from real applications such as perl, gcc, XML processing, and pathfinding
  • floating point: 17 benchmarks derived from real applications, including chemistry, physics, genetics, and weather.

It is also divided depending upon the amount of optimization allowed:

  • base: optimization is consistent per compiled language, all benchmarks must be compiled with the same flags per language.
  • peak: specific compiler optimization is allowed per application.

The overall metrics for the benchmark which are commonly used are:

  • SPECint_rate2006, SPECint_rate_base2006: integer, rate
  • SPECfp_rate2006, SPECfp_rate_base2006: floating point, rate
  • SPECint2006, SPECint_base2006: integer, speed
  • SPECfp2006, SPECfp_base2006: floating point, speed

See here for additional information.

See Also

Disclosure Statement

SPEC and the benchmark names SPECfp and SPECint are registered trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. Results as of 10 July 2012 from www.spec.org and this report.

Thursday Mar 29, 2012

Sun Server X2-8 (formerly Sun Fire X4800 M2) Delivers World Record TPC-C for x86 Systems

Oracle's Sun Server X2-8 (formerly Sun Fire X4800 M2 server) equipped with eight 2.4 GHz Intel Xeon Processor E7-8870 chips obtained a result of 5,055,888 tpmC on the TPC-C benchmark. This result is a world record for x86 servers. Oracle demonstrated this world record database performance running Oracle Database 11g Release 2 Enterprise Edition with Partitioning.

  • The Sun Server X2-8 delivered a new x86 TPC-C world record of 5,055,888 tpmC with a price performance of $0.89/tpmC using Oracle Database 11g Release 2. This configuration is available 7/10/12.

  • The Sun Server X2-8 delivers 3.0x times better performance than the next 8-processor result, an IBM System p 570 equipped with POWER6 processors.

  • The Sun Server X2-8 has 3.1x times better price/performance than the 8-processor 4.7GHz POWER6 IBM System p 570.

  • The Sun Server X2-8 has 1.6x times better performance than the 4-processor IBM x3850 X5 system equipped with Intel Xeon processors.

  • This is the first TPC-C result on any system using eight Intel Xeon Processor E7-8800 Series chips.

  • The Sun Server X2-8 is the first x86 system to get over 5 million tpmC.

  • The Oracle solution utilized Oracle Linux operating system and Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 2 with Partitioning to produce the x86 world record TPC-C benchmark performance.

Performance Landscape

Select TPC-C results (sorted by tpmC, bigger is better)

System p/c/t tpmC Price
/tpmC
Avail Database Memory
Size
Sun Server X2-8 8/80/160 5,055,888 0.89 USD 7/10/2012 Oracle 11g R2 4 TB
IBM x3850 X5 4/40/80 3,014,684 0.59 USD 7/11/2011 DB2 ESE 9.7 3 TB
IBM x3850 X5 4/32/64 2,308,099 0.60 USD 5/20/2011 DB2 ESE 9.7 1.5 TB
IBM System p 570 8/16/32 1,616,162 3.54 USD 11/21/2007 DB2 9.0 2 TB

p/c/t - processors, cores, threads
Avail - availability date

Oracle and IBM TPC-C Response times

System tpmC Response Time (sec)
New Order 90th%
Response Time (sec)
New Order Average

Sun Server X2-8 5,055,888 0.210 0.166
IBM x3850 X5 3,014,684 0.500 0.272
Ratios - Oracle Better 1.6x 1.4x 1.3x

Oracle uses average new order response time for comparison between Oracle and IBM.

Graphs of Oracle's and IBM's response times for New-Order can be found in the full disclosure reports on TPC's website TPC-C Official Result Page.

Configuration Summary and Results

Hardware Configuration:

Server
Sun Server X2-8
8 x 2.4 GHz Intel Xeon Processor E7-8870
4 TB memory
8 x 300 GB 10K RPM SAS internal disks
8 x Dual port 8 Gbs FC HBA

Data Storage
10 x Sun Fire X4270 M2 servers configured as COMSTAR heads, each with
1 x 3.06 GHz Intel Xeon X5675 processor
8 GB memory
10 x 2 TB 7.2K RPM 3.5" SAS disks
2 x Sun Storage F5100 Flash Array storage (1.92 TB each)
1 x Brocade 5300 switches

Redo Storage
2 x Sun Fire X4270 M2 servers configured as COMSTAR heads, each with
1 x 3.06 GHz Intel Xeon X5675 processor
8 GB memory
11 x 2 TB 7.2K RPM 3.5" SAS disks

Clients
8 x Sun Fire X4170 M2 servers, each with
2 x 3.06 GHz Intel Xeon X5675 processors
48 GB memory
2 x 300 GB 10K RPM SAS disks

Software Configuration:

Oracle Linux (Sun Fire 4800 M2)
Oracle Solaris 11 Express (COMSTAR for Sun Fire X4270 M2)
Oracle Solaris 10 9/10 (Sun Fire X4170 M2)
Oracle Database 11g Release 2 Enterprise Edition with Partitioning
Oracle iPlanet Web Server 7.0 U5
Tuxedo CFS-R Tier 1

Results:

System: Sun Server X2-8
tpmC: 5,055,888
Price/tpmC: 0.89 USD
Available: 7/10/2012
Database: Oracle Database 11g
Cluster: no
New Order Average Response: 0.166 seconds

Benchmark Description

TPC-C is an OLTP system benchmark. It simulates a complete environment where a population of terminal operators executes transactions against a database. The benchmark is centered around the principal activities (transactions) of an order-entry environment. These transactions include entering and delivering orders, recording payments, checking the status of orders, and monitoring the level of stock at the warehouses.

Key Points and Best Practices

  • Oracle Database 11g Release 2 Enterprise Edition with Partitioning scales easily to this high level of performance.

  • COMSTAR (Common Multiprotocol SCSI Target) is the software framework that enables an Oracle Solaris host to serve as a SCSI Target platform. COMSTAR uses a modular approach to break the huge task of handling all the different pieces in a SCSI target subsystem into independent functional modules which are glued together by the SCSI Target Mode Framework (STMF). The modules implementing functionality at SCSI level (disk, tape, medium changer etc.) are not required to know about the underlying transport. And the modules implementing the transport protocol (FC, iSCSI, etc.) are not aware of the SCSI-level functionality of the packets they are transporting. The framework hides the details of allocation providing execution context and cleanup of SCSI commands and associated resources and simplifies the task of writing the SCSI or transport modules.

  • Oracle iPlanet Web Server middleware is used for the client tier of the benchmark. Each web server instance supports more than a quarter-million users while satisfying the response time requirement from the TPC-C benchmark.

See Also

Disclosure Statement

TPC Benchmark C, tpmC, and TPC-C are trademarks of the Transaction Processing Performance Council (TPC). Sun Server X2-8 (8/80/160) with Oracle Database 11g Release 2 Enterprise Edition with Partitioning, 5,055,888 tpmC, $0.89 USD/tpmC, available 7/10/2012. IBM x3850 X5 (4/40/80) with DB2 ESE 9.7, 3,014,684 tpmC, $0.59 USD/tpmC, available 7/11/2011. IBM x3850 X5 (4/32/64) with DB2 ESE 9.7, 2,308,099 tpmC, $0.60 USD/tpmC, available 5/20/2011. IBM System p 570 (8/16/32) with DB2 9.0, 1,616,162 tpmC, $3.54 USD/tpmC, available 11/21/2007. Source: http://www.tpc.org/tpcc, results as of 7/15/2011.

Monday Feb 27, 2012

Sun ZFS Storage 7320 Appliance 33% Faster Than NetApp FAS3270 on SPECsfs2008

Oracle's Sun ZFS Storage 7320 appliance delivered outstanding performance on the SPECsfs2008 NFS benchmark, beating results published on NetApp's fastest midrange platform, the NetApp FAS3270, and the EMC Gateway NS-G8 Server Failover Cluster.

  • The Sun ZFS Storage 7320 appliance delivered 134,140 SPECsfs2008_nfs.v3 Ops/sec with an Overall Response Time (ORT) of 1.51 msec on the SPECsfs2008 NFS benchmark.

  • The Sun ZFS Storage 7320 appliance has 33% higher throughput than the NetApp FAS3270 on the SPECsfs2008 NFS benchmark.

  • The Sun ZFS Storage 7320 appliance required less than half the rack space of the NetApp FAS3270.

  • The Sun ZFS Storage 7320 appliance has 9% better Overall Response Time than the NetApp FAS3270 on the SPECsfs2008 NFS benchmark.

Performance Landscape

SPECsfs2008_nfs.v3 Performance Chart (in decreasing SPECsfs2008_nfs.v3 Ops/sec order)

Sponsor System Throughput
(Ops/sec)
Overall Response
Time (msec)
Memory
(GB)
Disks Exported
Capacity (TB)
Rack Units
Controllers+Disks
EMC VG8 135,521 1.92 280 312 19.2
Oracle 7320 134,140 1.51 288 136 37.0 26
EMC NS-G8 110,621 2.32 264 100 17.6
NetApp FAS3270 101,183 1.66 40 360 110.1 66

Throughput SPECsfs2008_nfs.v3 Ops/sec = the Performance Metric
Overall Response Time = the corresponding Response Time Metric

Complete SPECsfs2008 benchmark results may be found at http://www.spec.org/sfs2008/results/sfs2008.html.

Configuration Summary

Storage Configuration:

Sun ZFS Storage 7320 appliance in clustered configuration
2 x Sun ZFS Storage 7320 controllers, each with
2 x 2.4 GHz Intel Xeon E5620 processors
144 GB memory
4 x 512 GB SSD flash-enabled read-cache
6 x Sun Disk shelves
4 x shelves with 24 x 300 GB 15K RPM SAS-2 drives
2 x shelves with 20 x 300 GB 15K RPM SAS-2 drives and 4 x 73 GB SAS-2 flash-enabled write-cache

Server Configuration:

3 x Sun Fire X4270 M2 servers, each with
2 x 2.4 GHz Intel Xeon E5620 processors
12 GB memory
1 x 10 GbE connection to the Sun ZFS Storage 7320 appliance
Oracle Solaris 10 8/11

Benchmark Description

SPECsfs2008 is the latest version of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation (SPEC) benchmark suite measuring file server throughput and response time, providing a standardized method for comparing performance across different vendor platforms. SPECsfs2008 results summarize the server's capabilities with respect to the number of operations that can be handled per second, as well as the overall latency of the operations. The suite is a follow-on to the SFS97_R1 benchmark, adding a CIFS workload, an updated NFSv3 workload, support for additional client platforms, and a new test harness and reporting/submission framework.

See Also

Disclosure Statement

SPEC and SPECsfs are registered trademarks of Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation (SPEC). Results as of February 22, 2012, for more information see www.spec.org. Sun ZFS Storage 7320 Appliance 134,140 SPECsfs2008_nfs.v3 Ops/sec, 1.51 msec ORT, NetApp FAS3270 101,183 SPECsfs2008_nfs.v3 Ops/Sec, 1.66 msec ORT, EMC Celerra Gateway NS-G8 Server Failover Cluster, 3 Datamovers (1 stdby) / Symmetrix V-Max 110,621 SPECsfs2008_nfs.v3 Ops/Sec, 2.32 msec ORT.

Thursday Jan 12, 2012

Netra SPARC T4-2 SPECjvm2008 World Record Performance

Oracle's Netra SPARC T4-2 server equipped with two SPARC T4 processors running at 2.85 GHz delivered a World Record result of 454.52 SPECjvm2008 Peak ops/m on the SPECjvm2008 benchmark. This result just eclipsed the previous record which was run on a similar product, Oracle's SPARC T4-2 server, which is also a two SPARC T4 processor based system.

  • The Netra SPARC T4-2 server demonstrates 41% better performance than the SPARC T3-2 server and similar performance to Oracle's SPARC T4-2 server.

  • The Netra SPARC T4-2 server running the SPECjvm2008 benchmark achieved a score of 454.52 SPECjvm2008 Peak ops/m while the Sun Blade X6270 server module achieved 317.13 SPECjvm2008 Base ops/m.

  • The Netra SPARC T4-2 server with hardware cryptography acceleration greatly increases performance with subtests using AES and RSA encryption ciphers.

  • This result was produced using Oracle Solaris 11 and Oracle JDK 7 Update 2.

  • There are no SPECjvm2008 results published by IBM on POWER7 based systems.

  • The Netra SPARC T4-2 server demonstrates Oracle's position of leadership in Java-based computing by publishing world record results for the SPECjvm2008 benchmark.

Performance Landscape

Complete benchmark results are at the SPECjvm2008 website.

SPECjvm2008 Performance Chart
(ordered by performance)
System Processors Performance
base peak
Netra SPARC T4-2 2 x 2.85 GHz SPARC T4 - 454.52
SPARC T4-2 2 x 2.85 GHz SPARC T4 - 454.25
SPARC T3-2 2 x 1.65 GHz SPARC T3 - 320.52
Sun Blade X6270 2 x 2.93 GHz Intel X5570 317.13 -

base: SPECjvm2008 Base ops/m (bigger is better)
peak: SPECjvm2008 Peak ops/m (bigger is better)

SPEC allows base and peak to be submitted separately. The base metric does not allow any optimization of the JVM, the peak metric allows optimization.

Configuration Summary

Hardware Configuration:

Netra SPARC T4-2 server
2 x 2.85 GHz SPARC T4 processors
256 GB memory

Software Configuration:

Oracle Solaris 11 11/11
Java Platform, Standard Edition, JDK 7 Update 2

Benchmark Description

SPECjvm2008 (Java Virtual Machine Benchmark) is a benchmark suite for measuring the performance of a Java Runtime Environment (JRE), containing several real life applications and benchmarks focusing on core Java functionality. The suite focuses on the performance of the JRE executing a single application; it reflects the performance of the hardware processor and memory subsystem, but has low dependence on file I/O and includes no network I/O across machines.

The SPECjvm2008 workload mimics a variety of common general purpose application computations. These characteristics reflect the intent that this benchmark will be applicable to measuring basic Java performance on a wide variety of both client and server systems.

SPECjvm2008 benchmark highlights:

  • Leverages real life applications (like derby, sunflow, and javac) and area-focused benchmarks (like xml, serialization, crypto, and scimark).
  • Also measures the performance of the operating system and hardware in the context of executing the JRE.

The current rules for the benchmark allow either base or peak to be run. The base run is done without any tuning of the JVM to improve the out of the box performance. The peak run allows tuning of the JVM.

Key Points and Best Practices

  • Enhancements to the JVM had a major impact on performance, especially for the security tests.

See Also

Disclosure Statement

SPEC and SPECjvm are registered trademarks of Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. Results from www.spec.org and this report as of 1/9/2012. Netra SPARC T4-2 454.52 SPECjvm2008 Peak ops/m submitted for review, SPARC T4-2 454.25 SPECjvm2008 Peak ops/m, SPARC T3-2 320.52 SPECjvm2008 Peak ops/m, Sun Blade X6270 317.13 SPECjvm2008 Base ops/m.

Wednesday Nov 30, 2011

SPARC T4-4 Beats 8-CPU IBM POWER7 on TPC-H @3000GB Benchmark

Oracle's SPARC T4-4 server delivered a world record TPC-H @3000GB benchmark result for systems with four processors. This result beats eight processor results from IBM (POWER7) and HP (x86). The SPARC T4-4 server also delivered better performance per core than these eight processor systems from IBM and HP. Comparisons below are based upon system to system comparisons, highlighting Oracle's complete software and hardware solution.

This database world record result used Oracle's Sun Storage 2540-M2 arrays (rotating disk) connected to a SPARC T4-4 server running Oracle Solaris 11 and Oracle Database 11g Release 2 demonstrating the power of Oracle's integrated hardware and software solution.

  • The SPARC T4-4 server based configuration achieved a TPC-H scale factor 3000 world record for four processor systems of 205,792 QphH@3000GB with price/performance of $4.10/QphH@3000GB.

  • The SPARC T4-4 server with four SPARC T4 processors (total of 32 cores) is 7% faster than the IBM Power 780 server with eight POWER7 processors (total of 32 cores) on the TPC-H @3000GB benchmark.

  • The SPARC T4-4 server is 36% better in price performance compared to the IBM Power 780 server on the TPC-H @3000GB Benchmark.

  • The SPARC T4-4 server is 29% faster than the IBM Power 780 for data loading.

  • The SPARC T4-4 server is up to 3.4 times faster than the IBM Power 780 server for the Refresh Function.

  • The SPARC T4-4 server with four SPARC T4 processors is 27% faster than the HP ProLiant DL980 G7 server with eight x86 processors on the TPC-H @3000GB benchmark.

  • The SPARC T4-4 server is 52% faster than the HP ProLiant DL980 G7 server for data loading.

  • The SPARC T4-4 server is up to 3.2 times faster than the HP ProLiant DL980 G7 for the Refresh Function.

  • The SPARC T4-4 server achieved a peak IO rate from the Oracle database of 17 GB/sec. This rate was independent of the storage used, as demonstrated by the TPC-H @3000TB benchmark which used twelve Sun Storage 2540-M2 arrays (rotating disk) and the TPC-H @1000TB benchmark which used four Sun Storage F5100 Flash Array devices (flash storage). [*]

  • The SPARC T4-4 server showed linear scaling from TPC-H @1000GB to TPC-H @3000GB. This demonstrates that the SPARC T4-4 server can handle the increasingly larger databases required of DSS systems. [*]

  • The SPARC T4-4 server benchmark results demonstrate a complete solution of building Decision Support Systems including data loading, business questions and refreshing data. Each phase usually has a time constraint and the SPARC T4-4 server shows superior performance during each phase.

[*] The TPC believes that comparisons of results published with different scale factors are misleading and discourages such comparisons.

Performance Landscape

The table lists the leading TPC-H @3000GB results for non-clustered systems.

TPC-H @3000GB, Non-Clustered Systems
System
Processor
P/C/T – Memory
Composite
(QphH)
$/perf
($/QphH)
Power
(QppH)
Throughput
(QthH)
Database Available
SPARC Enterprise M9000
3.0 GHz SPARC64 VII+
64/256/256 – 1024 GB
386,478.3 $18.19 316,835.8 471,428.6 Oracle 11g R2 09/22/11
SPARC T4-4
3.0 GHz SPARC T4
4/32/256 – 1024 GB
205,792.0 $4.10 190,325.1 222,515.9 Oracle 11g R2 05/31/12
SPARC Enterprise M9000
2.88 GHz SPARC64 VII
32/128/256 – 512 GB
198,907.5 $15.27 182,350.7 216,967.7 Oracle 11g R2 12/09/10
IBM Power 780
4.1 GHz POWER7
8/32/128 – 1024 GB
192,001.1 $6.37 210,368.4 175,237.4 Sybase 15.4 11/30/11
HP ProLiant DL980 G7
2.27 GHz Intel Xeon X7560
8/64/128 – 512 GB
162,601.7 $2.68 185,297.7 142,685.6 SQL Server 2008 10/13/10

P/C/T = Processors, Cores, Threads
QphH = the Composite Metric (bigger is better)
$/QphH = the Price/Performance metric in USD (smaller is better)
QppH = the Power Numerical Quantity
QthH = the Throughput Numerical Quantity

The following table lists data load times and refresh function times during the power run.

TPC-H @3000GB, Non-Clustered Systems
Database Load & Database Refresh
System
Processor
Data Loading
(h:m:s)
T4
Advan
RF1
(sec)
T4
Advan
RF2
(sec)
T4
Advan
SPARC T4-4
3.0 GHz SPARC T4
04:08:29 1.0x 67.1 1.0x 39.5 1.0x
IBM Power 780
4.1 GHz POWER7
05:51:50 1.5x 147.3 2.2x 133.2 3.4x
HP ProLiant DL980 G7
2.27 GHz Intel Xeon X7560
08:35:17 2.1x 173.0 2.6x 126.3 3.2x

Data Loading = database load time
RF1 = power test first refresh transaction
RF2 = power test second refresh transaction
T4 Advan = the ratio of time to T4 time

Complete benchmark results found at the TPC benchmark website http://www.tpc.org.

Configuration Summary and Results

Hardware Configuration:

SPARC T4-4 server
4 x SPARC T4 3.0 GHz processors (total of 32 cores, 128 threads)
1024 GB memory
8 x internal SAS (8 x 300 GB) disk drives

External Storage:

12 x Sun Storage 2540-M2 array storage, each with
12 x 15K RPM 300 GB drives, 2 controllers, 2 GB cache

Software Configuration:

Oracle Solaris 11 11/11
Oracle Database 11g Release 2 Enterprise Edition

Audited Results:

Database Size: 3000 GB (Scale Factor 3000)
TPC-H Composite: 205,792.0 QphH@3000GB
Price/performance: $4.10/QphH@3000GB
Available: 05/31/2012
Total 3 year Cost: $843,656
TPC-H Power: 190,325.1
TPC-H Throughput: 222,515.9
Database Load Time: 4:08:29

Benchmark Description

The TPC-H benchmark is a performance benchmark established by the Transaction Processing Council (TPC) to demonstrate Data Warehousing/Decision Support Systems (DSS). TPC-H measurements are produced for customers to evaluate the performance of various DSS systems. These queries and updates are executed against a standard database under controlled conditions. Performance projections and comparisons between different TPC-H Database sizes (100GB, 300GB, 1000GB, 3000GB, 10000GB, 30000GB and 100000GB) are not allowed by the TPC.

TPC-H is a data warehousing-oriented, non-industry-specific benchmark that consists of a large number of complex queries typical of decision support applications. It also includes some insert and delete activity that is intended to simulate loading and purging data from a warehouse. TPC-H measures the combined performance of a particular database manager on a specific computer system.

The main performance metric reported by TPC-H is called the TPC-H Composite Query-per-Hour Performance Metric (QphH@SF, where SF is the number of GB of raw data, referred to as the scale factor). QphH@SF is intended to summarize the ability of the system to process queries in both single and multiple user modes. The benchmark requires reporting of price/performance, which is the ratio of the total HW/SW cost plus 3 years maintenance to the QphH. A secondary metric is the storage efficiency, which is the ratio of total configured disk space in GB to the scale factor.

Key Points and Best Practices

  • Twelve Sun Storage 2540-M2 arrays were used for the benchmark. Each Sun Storage 2540-M2 array contains 12 15K RPM drives and is connected to a single dual port 8Gb FC HBA using 2 ports. Each Sun Storage 2540-M2 array showed 1.5 GB/sec for sequential read operations and showed linear scaling, achieving 18 GB/sec with twelve Sun Storage 2540-M2 arrays. These were stand alone IO tests.

  • The peak IO rate measured from the Oracle database was 17 GB/sec.

  • Oracle Solaris 11 11/11 required very little system tuning.

  • Some vendors try to make the point that storage ratios are of customer concern. However, storage ratio size has more to do with disk layout and the increasing capacities of disks – so this is not an important metric in which to compare systems.

  • The SPARC T4-4 server and Oracle Solaris efficiently managed the system load of over one thousand Oracle Database parallel processes.

  • Six Sun Storage 2540-M2 arrays were mirrored to another six Sun Storage 2540-M2 arrays on which all of the Oracle database files were placed. IO performance was high and balanced across all the arrays.

  • The TPC-H Refresh Function (RF) simulates periodical refresh portion of Data Warehouse by adding new sales and deleting old sales data. Parallel DML (parallel insert and delete in this case) and database log performance are a key for this function and the SPARC T4-4 server outperformed both the IBM POWER7 server and HP ProLiant DL980 G7 server. (See the RF columns above.)

See Also

Disclosure Statement

TPC-H, QphH, $/QphH are trademarks of Transaction Processing Performance Council (TPC). For more information, see www.tpc.org. SPARC T4-4 205,792.0 QphH@3000GB, $4.10/QphH@3000GB, available 5/31/12, 4 processors, 32 cores, 256 threads; IBM Power 780 QphH@3000GB, 192,001.1 QphH@3000GB, $6.37/QphH@3000GB, available 11/30/11, 8 processors, 32 cores, 128 threads; HP ProLiant DL980 G7 162,601.7 QphH@3000GB, $2.68/QphH@3000GB available 10/13/10, 8 processors, 64 cores, 128 threads.

Wednesday Nov 09, 2011

SPARC T4-2 Delivers World Record SPECjvm2008 Result with Oracle Solaris 11

Oracle's SPARC T4-2 server equipped with two SPARC T4 processors running at 2.85 GHz delivered a World Record result of 454.25 SPECjvm2008 Peak ops/m on the SPECjvm2008 benchmark.

  • The SPARC T4-2 server demonstrates 41% better performance than the SPARC T3-2 server.

  • The SPARC T4-2 server with hardware cryptography acceleration greatly increases performance with subtests using AES and RSA encryption ciphers.

  • This result was produced using Oracle Solaris 11 and Oracle JDK 7 Update 2.

  • There are no SPECjvm2008 results published by IBM on POWER7 based systems.

  • The SPARC T4-2 server demonstrates Oracle's position of leadership in Java-based computing by publishing world record results for the SPECjvm2008 benchmark.

Performance Landscape

Complete benchmark results are at the SPECjvm2008 website.

SPECjvm2008 Performance Chart
(ordered by performance)
System Processors Performance
base peak
SPARC T4-2 2 x 2.85 GHz SPARC T4 - 454.25
SPARC T3-2 2 x 1.65 GHz SPARC T3 - 320.52
Sun Blade X6270 2 x 2.93 GHz Intel X5570 317.13 -

base: SPECjvm2008 Base ops/m (bigger is better)
peak: SPECjvm2008 Peak ops/m (bigger is better)

SPEC allows base and peak to be submitted separately. The base metric does not allow any optimization of the JVM, the peak metric allows optimization.

Configuration Summary

Hardware Configuration:

SPARC T4-2 server
2 x 2.85 GHz SPARC T4 processors
256 GB memory

Software Configuration:

Oracle Solaris 11 11/11
Java Platform, Standard Edition, JDK 7 Update 2

Benchmark Description

SPECjvm2008 (Java Virtual Machine Benchmark) is a benchmark suite for measuring the performance of a Java Runtime Environment (JRE), containing several real life applications and benchmarks focusing on core Java functionality. The suite focuses on the performance of the JRE executing a single application; it reflects the performance of the hardware processor and memory subsystem, but has low dependence on file I/O and includes no network I/O across machines.

The SPECjvm2008 workload mimics a variety of common general purpose application computations. These characteristics reflect the intent that this benchmark will be applicable to measuring basic Java performance on a wide variety of both client and server systems.

SPECjvm2008 benchmark highlights:

  • Leverages real life applications (like derby, sunflow, and javac) and area-focused benchmarks (like xml, serialization, crypto, and scimark).
  • Also measures the performance of the operating system and hardware in the context of executing the JRE.

The current rules for the benchmark allow either base or peak to be run. The base run is done without any tuning of the JVM to improve the out of the box performance. The peak run allows tuning of the JVM.

Key Points and Best Practices

  • Enhancements to the JVM had a major impact on performance, especially for the security tests.

See Also

Disclosure Statement

SPEC and SPECjvm are registered trademarks of Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. Results from www.spec.org and this report as of 11/9/2011. SPARC T4-2 454.25 SPECjvm2008 Peak ops/m submitted for review, SPARC T3-2 320.52 SPECjvm2008 Peak ops/m, Sun Blade X6270 317.13 SPECjvm2008 Base ops/m.

Monday Oct 03, 2011

SPARC T4-4 Beats IBM POWER7 and HP Itanium on TPC-H @1000GB Benchmark

Oracle's SPARC T4-4 server configured with SPARC-T4 processors, Oracle's Sun Storage F5100 Flash Array storage, Oracle Solaris, and Oracle Database 11g Release 2 achieved a TPC-H benchmark performance result of 201,487 QphH@1000GB with price/performance of $4.60/QphH@1000GB.

  • The SPARC T4-4 server benchmark results demonstrate a complete solution of building Decision Support Systems including data loading, business questions and refreshing data. Each phase usually has a time constraint and the SPARC T4-4 server shows superior performance during each phase.

  • The SPARC T4-4 server is 22% faster than the 8-socket IBM POWER7 server with the same number of cores. The SPARC T4-4 server has over twice the performance per socket compared to the IBM POWER7 server.

  • The SPARC T4-4 server achieves 33% better price/performance than the IBM POWER7 server.

  • The SPARC T4-4 server is up to 4 times faster than the IBM POWER7 server for the Refresh Function.

  • The SPARC T4-4 server is 44% faster than the HP Superdome 2 server. The SPARC T4-4 server has 5.7x the performance per socket of the HP Superdome 2 server.

  • The SPARC T4-4 server is 62% better on price/performance than the HP Itanium server.

  • The SPARC T4-4 server is up to 3.7 times faster than the HP Itanium server for the Refresh Function.

  • The SPARC T4-4 server delivers nearly the same performance as Oracle's SPARC Enterprise M8000 server, but with 52% better price/performance on the TPC-H @1000GB benchmark.

  • Oracle used Storage Redundancy Level 3 as defined by the TPC-H 2.14.2 specification which is the strictest level.

  • This TPC-H result demonstrates that the SPARC T4-4 server can deliver the performance while running the increasingly larger databases required of DSS systems. The server measured more than 16 GB/sec of IO throughput through Oracle Database 11g Release 2 software while maintaining the high cpu load.

Performance Landscape

The table below lists published non-cluster results from comparable enterprise class systems from Oracle, IBM and HP. Each system was configured with 512 GB of memory.

TPC-H @1000GB

System
CPU type
Proc/Core/Thread
Composite
(QphH)
$/perf
($/QphH)
Power
(QppH)
Throughput
(QthH)
Database Available
SPARC Enterprise M8000
3 GHz SPARC64 VII+
16 / 64 / 128
209,533.6 $9.53 177,845.9 246,867.2 Oracle 11g 09/22/11
SPARC T4-4
3 GHz SPARC-T4
4 / 32 / 256
201,487.0 $4.60 181,760.6 223,354.2 Oracle 11g 10/30/11
IBM Power 780
4.14 GHz POWER7
8 / 32 / 128
164,747.2 $6.85 170,206.4 159,463.1 Sybase 03/31/11
HP Superdome 2
1.73 GHz Intel Itanium 9350
16 / 64 / 64
140,181.1 $12.15 139,181.0 141,188.3 Oracle 11g 10/20/10

QphH = the Composite Metric (bigger is better)
$/QphH = the Price/Performance metric (smaller is better)
QppH = the Power Numerical Quantity
QthH = the Throughput Numerical Quantity

Complete benchmark results found at the TPC benchmark website http://www.tpc.org.

Configuration Summary and Results

Hardware Configuration:

SPARC T4-4 server
4 x SPARC-T4 3.0 GHz processors (total of 32 cores, 128 threads)
512 GB memory
8 x internal SAS (8 x 300 GB) disk drives

External Storage:

4 x Sun Storage F5100 Flash Array storage, each with
80 x 24 GB Flash Modules

Software Configuration:

Oracle Solaris 10 8/11
Oracle Database 11g Release 2 Enterprise Edition

Audited Results:

Database Size: 1000 GB (Scale Factor 1000)
TPC-H Composite: 201,487 QphH@1000GB
Price/performance: $4.60/QphH@1000GB
Available: 10/30/2011
Total 3 Year Cost: $925,525
TPC-H Power: 181,760.6
TPC-H Throughput: 223,354.2
Database Load Time: 1:22:39

Benchmark Description

The TPC-H benchmark is a performance benchmark established by the Transaction Processing Council (TPC) to demonstrate Data Warehousing/Decision Support Systems (DSS). TPC-H measurements are produced for customers to evaluate the performance of various DSS systems. These queries and updates are executed against a standard database under controlled conditions. Performance projections and comparisons between different TPC-H Database sizes (100GB, 300GB, 1000GB, 3000GB and 10000GB) are not allowed by the TPC.

TPC-H is a data warehousing-oriented, non-industry-specific benchmark that consists of a large number of complex queries typical of decision support applications. It also includes some insert and delete activity that is intended to simulate loading and purging data from a warehouse. TPC-H measures the combined performance of a particular database manager on a specific computer system.

The main performance metric reported by TPC-H is called the TPC-H Composite Query-per-Hour Performance Metric (QphH@SF, where SF is the number of GB of raw data, referred to as the scale factor). QphH@SF is intended to summarize the ability of the system to process queries in both single and multi user modes. The benchmark requires reporting of price/performance, which is the ratio of QphH to total HW/SW cost plus 3 years maintenance.

Key Points and Best Practices

  • Four Sun Storage F5100 Flash Array devices were used for the benchmark. Each F5100 device contains 80 flash modules (FMODs). Twenty (20) FMODs from each F5100 device were connected to a single SAS 6 Gb HBA. A single F5100 device showed 4.16 GB/sec for sequential read and demonstrated linear scaling of 16.62 GB/sec with 4 x F5100 devices.

  • The IO rate from the Oracle database was over 16 GB/sec.

  • Oracle Solaris 10 8/11 required very little system tuning.

  • The SPARC T4-4 server and Oracle Solaris efficiently managed the system load of over one thousand Oracle parallel processes.

  • The Oracle database files for tables and indexes were managed by Oracle Automatic Storage Manager (ASM) with 4M stripe. Two F5100 devices were mirrored to another 2 F5100 devices under ASM. IO performance was high and balanced across all the FMODs.
  • The Oracle redo log files were mirrored across the F5100 devices using Oracle Solaris Volume Manager with 128K stripe.
  • Parallel degree on tables and indexes was set to 128. This setting worked the best for performance.
  • TPC-H Refresh Function simulates periodical Refresh portion of Data Warehouse by adding new sales and deleting old sales data. Parallel DML (parallel insert and delete in this case) and database log performance are a key for this function and the SPARC T4-4 server outperformed both HP Superdome 2 and IBM POWER7 servers.

See Also

Disclosure Statement

TPC-H, QphH, $/QphH are trademarks of Transaction Processing Performance Council (TPC). For more information, see www.tpc.org. SPARC T4-4 201,487 QphH@1000GB, $4.60/QphH@1000GB, avail 10/30/2011, 4 processors, 32 cores, 256 threads; SPARC Enterprise M8000 209,533.6 QphH@1000GB, $9.53/QphH@1000GB, avail 09/22/11, 16 processors, 64 cores, 128 threads; IBM Power 780 QphH@1000GB, 164,747.2 QphH@1000GB, $6.85/QphH@1000GB, avail 03/31/11, 8 processors, 32 cores, 128 threads; HP Integrity Superdome 2 140,181.1 QphH@1000GB, $12.15/QphH@1000GB avail 10/20/10, 16 processors, 64, cores, 64 threads.

About

BestPerf is the source of Oracle performance expertise. In this blog, Oracle's Strategic Applications Engineering group explores Oracle's performance results and shares best practices learned from working on Enterprise-wide Applications.

Index Pages
Search

Archives
« April 2014
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
  
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
   
       
Today