Tuesday Sep 10, 2013

Oracle ZFS Storage ZS3-4 Produces Best 2-Node Performance on SPECsfs2008 NFSv3

The Oracle ZFS Storage ZS3-4 storage system delivered world record two-node performance on the SPECsfs2008 NFSv3 benchmark, beating results published on NetApp's dual-controller and four-node high-end FAS6240 storage systems.

  • The Oracle ZFS Storage ZS3-4 storage system delivered a world record two-node result of 450,702 SPECsfs2008_nfs.v3 Ops/sec with an Overall Response Time (ORT) of 0.70 msec on the SPECsfs2008 NFSv3 benchmark.

  • The Oracle ZFS Storage ZS3-4 storage system delivered 2.4x higher throughput than the dual-controller NetApp FAS6240 and 4.5x higher throughput than the dual-controller NetApp FAS3270 on the SPECsfs2008_nfs.v3 benchmark at less than half the list price of either result.

  • The Oracle ZFS Storage ZS3-4 storage system had 42 percent higher throughput than the four-node NetApp FAS6240 on the SPECsfs2008 NFSv3 benchmark.

  • The Oracle ZFS Storage ZS3-4 storage aystem has 54 percent better Overall Response Time than the 4-node NetApp FAS6240 on the SPECsfs2008 NFSv3 benchmark.

Performance Landscape

Two node results for SPECsfs2008_nfs.v3 presented (in decreasing SPECsfs2008_nfs.v3 Ops/sec order) along with other select results.

Sponsor System Nodes Disks Throughput
(Ops/sec)
Overall Response
Time (msec)
Oracle ZS3-4 2 464 450,702 0.70
IBM SONAS 1.2 2 1975 403,326 3.23
NetApp FAS6240 4 288 260,388 1.53
NetApp FAS6240 2 288 190,675 1.17
EMC VG8 312 135,521 1.92
Oracle 7320 2 136 134,140 1.51
EMC NS-G8 100 110,621 2.32
NetApp FAS3270 2 360 101,183 1.66

Throughput SPECsfs2008_nfs.v3 Ops/sec — the Performance Metric
Overall Response Time — the corresponding Response Time Metric
Nodes — Nodes and Controllers are being used interchangeably

Complete SPECsfs2008 benchmark results may be found at http://www.spec.org/sfs2008/results/sfs2008.html.

Configuration Summary

Storage Configuration:

Oracle ZFS Storage ZS3-4 storage system in clustered configuration
2 x Oracle ZFS Storage ZS3-4 controllers, each with
8 x 2.4 GHz Intel Xeon E7-4870 processors
2 TB memory
2 x 10GbE NICs
20 x Sun Disk shelves
18 x shelves with 24 x 300 GB 15K RPM SAS-2 drives
2 x shelves with 20 x 300 GB 15K RPM SAS-2 drives and 8 x 73 GB SAS-2 flash-enabled write-cache

Benchmark Description

SPECsfs2008 is the latest version of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation (SPEC) benchmark suite measuring file server throughput and response time, providing a standardized method for comparing performance across different vendor platforms. SPECsfs2008 results summarize the server's capabilities with respect to the number of operations that can be handled per second, as well as the overall latency of the operations. The suite is a follow-on to the SFS97_R1 benchmark, adding a CIFS workload, an updated NFSv3 workload, support for additional client platforms, and a new test harness and reporting/submission framework.

See Also

Disclosure Statement

SPEC and SPECsfs are registered trademarks of Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation (SPEC). Results as of September 10, 2013, for more information see www.spec.org. Oracle ZFS Storage ZS3-4 Appliance 450,702 SPECsfs2008_nfs.v3 Ops/sec, 0.70 msec ORT, NetApp Data ONTAP 8.1 Cluster-Mode (4-node FAS6240) 260,388 SPECsfs2008_nfs.v3 Ops/Sec, 1.53 msec ORT, NetApp FAS6240 190,675 SPECsfs2008_nfs.v3 Ops/Sec, 1.17 msec ORT. NetApp FAS3270 101,183 SPECsfs2008_nfs.v3 Ops/Sec, 1.66 msec ORT.

Nodes refer to the item in the SPECsfs2008 disclosed Configuration Bill of Materials that have the Processing Elements that perform the NFS Processing Function. These are the first item listed in each of disclosed Configuration Bill of Materials except for EMC where it is both the first and third items listed, and HP, where it is the second item listed as Blade Servers. The number of nodes is from the QTY disclosed in the Configuration Bill of Materials as described above. Configuration Bill of Materials list price for Oracle result of US$ 423,644. Configuration Bill of Materials list price for NetApp FAS3270 result of US$ 1,215,290. Configuration Bill of Materials list price for NetApp FAS6240 result of US$ 1,028,118. Oracle pricing from https://shop.oracle.com/pls/ostore/f?p=dstore:home:0, traverse to "Storage and Tape" and then to "NAS Storage". NetApp's pricing from http://www.netapp.com/us/media/na-list-usd-netapp-custom-state-new-discounts.html.

Oracle ZFS Storage ZS3-2 Beats Comparable NetApp on SPECsfs2008 NFSv3

Oracle ZFS Storage ZS3-2 storage system delivered outstanding performance on the SPECsfs2008 NFSv3 benchmark, beating results published on NetApp's fastest midrange platform, the NetApp FAS3270, the NetApp FAS6240 and the EMC Gateway NS-G8 Server Failover Cluster.

  • The Oracle ZFS Storage ZS3-2 storage system delivered 210,535 SPECsfs2008_nfs.v3 Ops/sec with an Overall Response Time (ORT) of 1.12 msec on the SPECsfs2008 NFSv3 benchmark.

  • The Oracle ZFS Storage ZS3-2 storage system delivered 10% higher throughput than the NetApp FAS6240 on the SPECsfs2008 NFSv3 benchmark.

  • The Oracle ZFS Storage ZS3-2 storage system has 52% higher throughput than the NetApp FAS3270 on the SPECsfs2008 NFSv3 benchmark.

  • The Oracle ZFS Storage ZS3-2 storage system has 5% better Overall Response Time than the NetApp FAS6240 on the SPECsfs2008 NFSv3 benchmark.

  • The Oracle ZFS Storage ZS3-2 storage system has 33% better Overall Response Time than the NetApp FAS3270 on the SPECsfs2008 NFSv3 benchmark.

Performance Landscape

Results for SPECsfs2008 NFSv3 (in decreasing SPECsfs2008_nfs.v3 Ops/sec order) for competitive systems.

Sponsor System Throughput
(Ops/sec)
Overall Response
Time (msec)
Oracle ZS3-2 210,535 1.12
NetApp FAS6240 190,675 1.17
EMC VG8 135,521 1.92
EMC NS-G8 110,621 2.32
NetApp FAS3270 101,183 1.66
NetApp FAS3250 100,922 1.76

Throughput SPECsfs2008_nfs.v3 Ops/sec = the Performance Metric
Overall Response Time = the corresponding Response Time Metric

Complete SPECsfs2008 benchmark results may be found at http://www.spec.org/sfs2008/results/sfs2008.html.

Configuration Summary

Storage Configuration:

Oracle ZFS Storage ZS3-2 storage system in clustered configuration
2 x Oracle ZFS Storage ZS3-2 controllers, each with
4 x 2.1 GHz Intel Xeon E5-2658 processors
512 GB memory
8 x Sun Disk shelves
3 x shelves with 24 x 900 GB 10K RPM SAS-2 drives
3 x shelves with 20 x 900 GB 10K RPM SAS-2 drives
2 x shelves with 20 x 900 GB 10K RPM SAS-2 drives and 4 x 73 GB SAS-2 flash-enabled write-cache

Benchmark Description

SPECsfs2008 is the latest version of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation (SPEC) benchmark suite measuring file server throughput and response time, providing a standardized method for comparing performance across different vendor platforms. SPECsfs2008 results summarize the server's capabilities with respect to the number of operations that can be handled per second, as well as the overall latency of the operations. The suite is a follow-on to the SFS97_R1 benchmark, adding a CIFS workload, an updated NFSv3 workload, support for additional client platforms, and a new test harness and reporting/submission framework.

 

See Also

Disclosure Statement

SPEC and SPECsfs are registered trademarks of Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation (SPEC). Results as of September 10, 2013, for more information see www.spec.org. Oracle ZFS Storage ZS3-2 Appliance 210,535 SPECsfs2008_nfs.v3 Ops/sec, 1.12 msec ORT, NetApp FAS6240 190,675 SPECsfs2008_nfs.v3 Ops/Sec, 1.17 msec ORT, EMC Celerra VG8 Server Failover Cluster, 2 Data Movers (1 stdby) / Symmetrix VMAX 135,521 SPECsfs2008_nfs.v3 Ops/Sec, 1.92 msec ORT, EMC Celerra Gateway NS-G8 Server Failover Cluster, 3 Datamovers (1 stdby) / Symmetrix V-Max 110,621 SPECsfs2008_nfs.v3 Ops/Sec, 2.32 msec ORT. NetApp FAS3270 101,183 SPECsfs2008_nfs.v3 Ops/Sec, 1.66 msec ORT. NetApp FAS3250 100,922 SPECsfs2008_nfs.v3 Ops/Sec, 1.76 msec ORT.

Monday Sep 09, 2013

Benchmarks Using Oracle Solaris 11

The following is a list of links to recent benchmarks which used Oracle Solaris 11.

BestPerf Index 26 September 2013

This is an occasionally-generated index of previous entries in the BestPerf blog. Skip to next entry

Colors used:

Benchmark
Best Practices
Index

Sep 26, 2013 SPARC M6-32 Delivers Oracle E-Business and PeopleSoft World Record Benchmarks, Linear Data Warehouse Scaling in a Virtualized Configuration
Sep 26, 2013 SPARC T5-8 Delivers World Record Single Server SPECjEnterprise2010 Benchmark, Utilizes Virtualized Environment
Sep 26, 2013 SPARC T5-2 Server Beats x86 Server on Oracle Database Transparent Data Encryption
Sep 25, 2013 SPARC T5-8 Delivers World Record Oracle OLAP Perf Version 3 Benchmark Result on Oracle Database 12c
Sep 25, 2013 SPARC T5 Encryption Performance Tops Intel E5-2600 v2 Processor
Sep 25, 2013 Sun Server X4-2 Delivers Single App Server, 2-Chip x86 World Record SPECjEnterprise2010
Sep 23, 2013 SPARC T5-2 Delivers Best 2-Chip MultiJVM SPECjbb2013 Result
Sep 18, 2013 Sun Server X4-2 Performance Running SPECjbb2013 MultiJVM Benchmark
Sep 10, 2013 Oracle ZFS Storage ZS3-4 Delivers World Record SPC-2 Performance
Sep 10, 2013 Oracle ZFS Storage ZS3-4 Produces Best 2-Node Performance on SPECsfs2008 NFSv3
Sep 10, 2013 Oracle ZFS Storage ZS3-2 Beats Comparable NetApp on SPECsfs2008 NFSv3
Jul 01, 2013 Quick Note about Blog Posting from John
Jun 12, 2013 SPARC T5-4 Produces World Record Single Server TPC-H @3000GB Benchmark Result
May 01, 2013 SPARC T5-8 Delivers Best Single System SPECjEnterprise2010 Benchmark, Beats IBM
Mar 29, 2013 SPARC T5 System Performance for Encryption Microbenchmark
Mar 26, 2013 SPARC T5-8 Produces TPC-C Benchmark Single-System World Record Performance
Mar 26, 2013 SPARC T5-8 Delivers SPECjEnterprise2010 Benchmark World Record Performance
Mar 26, 2013 SPARC T5-2 Achieves SPECjbb2013 Benchmark World Record Result
Mar 26, 2013 SPARC T5-8 Realizes SAP SD Two-Tier Benchmark World Record for 8 Chip Systems
Mar 26, 2013 SPARC M5-32 Produces SAP SD Two-Tier Benchmark World Record for SAP Enhancement Package 5 for SAP ERP 6.0
Mar 26, 2013 SPARC T5 Systems Deliver SPEC CPU2006 Rate Benchmark Multiple World Records
Mar 26, 2013 SPARC T5-2 Achieves JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Benchmark World Records
Mar 26, 2013 SPARC T5-2 Scores Siebel CRM Benchmark World Record
Mar 26, 2013 SPARC T5 Systems Produce Oracle TimesTen Benchmark World Record
Mar 26, 2013 SPARC T5-8 Delivers Oracle OLAP World Record Performance
Mar 26, 2013 SPARC T5-2 Achieves ZFS File System Encryption Benchmark World Record
Mar 26, 2013 SPARC T5-2 Obtains Oracle Internet Directory Benchmark World Record Performance
Mar 26, 2013 SPARC T5-2 Scores Oracle FLEXCUBE Universal Banking Benchmark World Record Performance
Mar 26, 2013 SPARC T5-2 Performance Running Oracle Fusion Middleware SOA
Mar 26, 2013 SPARC T5-1B Performance Running Oracle Communications ASAP
Mar 26, 2013 Benchmarks Using Oracle Solaris 11
Feb 22, 2013 Oracle Produces World Record SPECjbb2013 Result with Oracle Solaris and Oracle JDK
Feb 08, 2013 Improved Oracle Solaris 10 1/13 Secure Copy Performance for High Latency Networks
Nov 08, 2012 SPARC T4-4 Delivers World Record Performance on Oracle OLAP Perf Version 2 Benchmark
Nov 08, 2012 Improved Performance on PeopleSoft Combined Benchmark using SPARC T4-4
Oct 02, 2012 Performance of Oracle Business Intelligence Benchmark on SPARC T4-4
Oct 02, 2012 World Record Oracle E-Business Consolidated Workload on SPARC T4-2
Oct 02, 2012 World Record Siebel PSPP Benchmark on SPARC T4 Servers
Oct 02, 2012 SPARC T4-4 Delivers World Record First Result on PeopleSoft Combined Benchmark
Oct 01, 2012 World Record Batch Rate on Oracle JD Edwards Consolidated Workload with SPARC T4-2
Oct 01, 2012 Oracle TimesTen In-Memory Database Performance on SPARC T4-2
Oct 01, 2012 World Record Performance on PeopleSoft Enterprise Financials Benchmark on SPARC T4-2
Aug 28, 2012 SPARC T4-2 Produces World Record Oracle Essbase Aggregate Storage Benchmark Result
May 01, 2012 SPARC T4 Servers Running Oracle Solaris 11 and Oracle RAC Deliver World Record on PeopleSoft HRMS 9.1
Apr 19, 2012 Sun ZFS Storage 7420 Appliance Delivers 2-Node World Record SPECsfs2008 NFS Benchmark
Apr 15, 2012 Sun ZFS Storage 7420 Appliance Delivers Top High-End Price/Performance Result for SPC-2 Benchmark
Apr 12, 2012 Sun Fire X4270 M3 SAP Enhancement Package 4 for SAP ERP 6.0 (Unicode) Two-Tier Standard Sales and Distribution (SD) Benchmark
Apr 10, 2012 World Record Oracle E-Business Suite 12.1.3 Standard Extra-Large Payroll (Batch) Benchmark on Sun Server X3-2L
Apr 10, 2012 SPEC CPU2006 Results on Oracle's Sun x86 Servers
Apr 10, 2012 SPEC CPU2006 Results on Oracle's Netra Server X3-2
Mar 29, 2012 Sun Server X2-8 (formerly Sun Fire X4800 M2) Delivers World Record TPC-C for x86 Systems
Mar 29, 2012 Sun Server X2-8 (formerly Sun Fire X4800 M2) Posts World Record x86 SPECjEnterprise2010 Result
Feb 27, 2012 Sun ZFS Storage 7320 Appliance 33% Faster Than NetApp FAS3270 on SPECsfs2008
Jan 12, 2012 Netra SPARC T4-2 SPECjvm2008 World Record Performance
Nov 30, 2011 SPARC T4-4 Beats 8-CPU IBM POWER7 on TPC-H @3000GB Benchmark
Nov 09, 2011 SPARC T4-2 Delivers World Record SPECjvm2008 Result with Oracle Solaris 11
Nov 02, 2011 SPARC T4-2 Server Beats 2-Socket 3.46 GHz x86 on Black-Scholes Option Pricing Test
Oct 03, 2011 SPARC T4-4 Servers Set World Record on SPECjEnterprise2010, Beats IBM POWER7, Cisco x86
Oct 03, 2011 SPARC T4-4 Beats IBM POWER7 and HP Itanium on TPC-H @1000GB Benchmark
Oct 03, 2011 Sun ZFS Storage 7420 Appliance Doubles NetApp FAS3270A on SPC-1 Benchmark
Oct 03, 2011 SPARC T4-4 Produces World Record Oracle OLAP Capacity
Sep 30, 2011 SPARC T4-2 Server Beats Intel (Westmere AES-NI) on ZFS Encryption Tests
Sep 30, 2011 SPARC T4 Processor Beats Intel (Westmere AES-NI) on AES Encryption Tests
Sep 29, 2011 SPARC T4 Processor Outperforms IBM POWER7 and Intel (Westmere AES-NI) on OpenSSL AES Encryption Test
Sep 29, 2011 SPARC T4-1 Server Outperforms Intel (Westmere AES-NI) on IPsec Encryption Tests
Sep 29, 2011 SPARC T4-2 Server Beats Intel (Westmere AES-NI) on SSL Network Tests
Sep 28, 2011 SPARC T4 Servers Set World Record on Oracle E-Business Suite R12 X-Large Order to Cash
Sep 28, 2011 SPARC T4-2 Server Beats Intel (Westmere AES-NI) on Oracle Database Tablespace Encryption Queries
Sep 28, 2011 SPARC T4 Servers Set World Record on PeopleSoft HRMS 9.1
Sep 27, 2011 SPARC T4-2 Servers Set World Record on JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Day in the Life Benchmark with Batch, Outperforms IBM POWER7
Sep 27, 2011 SPARC T4 Servers Set World Record on Siebel Loyalty Batch
Sep 27, 2011 SPARC T4-4 Server Sets World Record on PeopleSoft Payroll (N.A.) 9.1, Outperforms IBM Mainframe, HP Itanium
Sep 19, 2011 Halliburton ProMAX® Seismic Processing on Sun Blade X6270 M2 with Sun ZFS Storage 7320
Sep 15, 2011 Sun Fire X4800 M2 Servers (now known as Sun Server X2-8) Produce World Record on SAP SD-Parallel Benchmark
Sep 12, 2011 SPARC Enterprise M9000 Produces World Record SAP ATO Benchmark
Aug 12, 2011 Sun Blade X6270 M2 with Oracle WebLogic World Record 2 Processor SPECjEnterprise 2010 Benchmark
Jul 01, 2011 SPARC T3-1 Record Results Running JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Day in the Life Benchmark with Added Batch Component
Jun 10, 2011 SPARC Enterprise M5000 Delivers First PeopleSoft Payroll 9.1 Benchmark
Jun 03, 2011 SPARC Enterprise M8000 with Oracle 11g Beats IBM POWER7 on TPC-H @1000GB Benchmark
Mar 25, 2011 SPARC Enterprise M9000 with Oracle Database 11g Delivers World Record Single Server TPC-H @3000GB Result
Mar 23, 2011 SPARC T3-1B Doubles Performance on Oracle Fusion Middleware WebLogic Avitek Medical Records Sample Application
Mar 22, 2011 Netra SPARC T3-1 22% Faster Than IBM Running Oracle Communications ASAP
Feb 17, 2011 SPARC T3-1 takes JD Edwards "Day In the Life" benchmark lead, beats IBM Power7 by 25%
Dec 08, 2010 Sun Blade X6275 M2 Cluster with Sun Storage 7410 Performance Running Seismic Processing Reverse Time Migration
Dec 08, 2010 Sun Blade X6275 M2 Delivers Best Fluent (MCAE Application) Performance on Tested Configurations
Dec 07, 2010 Sun Blade X6275 M2 Server Module with Intel X5670 Processors SPEC CPU2006 Results
Dec 02, 2010 World Record TPC-C Result on Oracle's SPARC Supercluster with T3-4 Servers
Dec 02, 2010 World Record SPECweb2005 Result on SPARC T3-2 with Oracle iPlanet Web Server
Dec 02, 2010 World Record Performance on PeopleSoft Enterprise Financials Benchmark run on Sun SPARC Enterprise M4000 and M5000
Oct 26, 2010 3D VTI Reverse Time Migration Scalability On Sun Fire X2270-M2 Cluster with Sun Storage 7210
Oct 11, 2010 Sun SPARC Enterprise M9000 Server Delivers World Record Non-Clustered TPC-H @3000GB Performance
Sep 30, 2010 Consolidation of 30 x86 Servers onto One SPARC T3-2
Sep 29, 2010 SPARC T3-1 Delivers Record Number of Online Users on JD Edwards EnterpriseOne 9.0.1 Day in the Life Test
Sep 28, 2010 SPARC T3 Cryptography Performance Over 1.9x Increase in Throughput over UltraSPARC T2 Plus
Sep 28, 2010 SPARC T3-2 Delivers First Oracle E-Business X-Large Benchmark Self-Service (OLTP) Result
Sep 27, 2010 Sun Fire X2270 M2 Super-Linear Scaling of Hadoop Terasort and CloudBurst Benchmarks
Sep 27, 2010 SPARC T3-1 Shows Capabilities Running Online Auction Benchmark with Oracle Fusion Middleware
Sep 24, 2010 SPARC T3-2 sets World Record on SPECjvm2008 Benchmark
Sep 24, 2010 SPARC T3 Provides High Performance Security for Oracle Weblogic Applications
Sep 23, 2010 Sun Storage F5100 Flash Array with PCI-Express SAS-2 HBAs Achieves Over 17 GB/sec Read
Sep 23, 2010 SPARC T3-1 Performance on PeopleSoft Enterprise Financials 9.0 Benchmark
Sep 22, 2010 Oracle Solaris 10 9/10 ZFS OLTP Performance Improvements
Sep 22, 2010 SPARC T3-1 Supports 13,000 Users on Financial Services and Enterprise Application Integration Running Siebel CRM 8.1.1
Sep 21, 2010 ProMAX Performance and Throughput on Sun Fire X2270 and Sun Storage 7410
Sep 21, 2010 Sun Flash Accelerator F20 PCIe Cards Outperform IBM on SPC-1C
Sep 21, 2010 SPARC T3 Servers Deliver Top Performance on Oracle Communications Order and Service Management
Sep 20, 2010 Schlumberger's ECLIPSE 300 Performance Throughput On Sun Fire X2270 Cluster with Sun Storage 7410
Sep 20, 2010 Sun Fire X4470 4 Node Cluster Delivers World Record SAP SD-Parallel Benchmark Result
Sep 20, 2010 SPARC T3-4 Sets World Record Single Server Result on SPECjEnterprise2010 Benchmark
Aug 25, 2010 Transparent Failover with Solaris MPxIO and Oracle ASM
Aug 23, 2010 Repriced: SPC-1 Sun Storage 6180 Array (8Gb) 1.9x Better Than IBM DS5020 in Price-Performance
Aug 23, 2010 Repriced: SPC-2 (RAID 5 & 6 Results) Sun Storage 6180 Array (8Gb) Outperforms IBM DS5020 by up to 64% in Price-Performance
Jun 29, 2010 Sun Fire X2270 M2 Achieves Leading Single Node Results on ANSYS FLUENT Benchmark
Jun 29, 2010 Sun Fire X2270 M2 Demonstrates Outstanding Single Node Performance on MSC.Nastran Benchmarks
Jun 29, 2010 Sun Fire X2270 M2 Achieves Leading Single Node Results on ABAQUS Benchmark
Jun 29, 2010 Sun Fire X2270 M2 Sets World Record on SPEC OMP2001 Benchmark
Jun 29, 2010 Sun Fire X4170 M2 Sets World Record on SPEC CPU2006 Benchmark
Jun 29, 2010 Sun Blade X6270 M2 Sets World Record on SPECjbb2005 Benchmark
Jun 28, 2010 Sun Fire X4270 M2 Sets World Record on SPECjbb2005 Benchmark
Jun 28, 2010 Sun Fire X4470 Sets World Records on SPEC OMP2001 Benchmarks
Jun 28, 2010 Sun Fire X4470 Sets World Record on SPEC CPU2006 Rate Benchmark
Jun 28, 2010 Sun Fire X4470 2-Node Configuration Sets World Record for SAP SD-Parallel Benchmark
Jun 28, 2010 Sun Fire X4800 Sets World Record on SPECjbb2005 Benchmark
Jun 28, 2010 Sun Fire X4800 Sets World Records on SPEC CPU2006 Rate Benchmarks
Jun 10, 2010 Hyperion Essbase ASO World Record on Sun SPARC Enterprise M5000
Jun 09, 2010 PeopleSoft Payroll 500K Employees on Sun SPARC Enterprise M5000 World Record
Jun 03, 2010 Sun SPARC Enterprise T5440 World Record SPECjAppServer2004
May 11, 2010 Per-core Performance Myth Busting
Apr 14, 2010 Oracle Sun Storage F5100 Flash Array Delivers World Record SPC-1C Performance
Apr 13, 2010 Oracle Sun Flash Accelerator F20 PCIe Card Accelerates Web Caching Performance
Apr 06, 2010 WRF Benchmark: X6275 Beats Power6
Mar 29, 2010 Sun Blade X6275/QDR IB/ Reverse Time Migration
Feb 22, 2010 IBM POWER7 SPECfp_rate2006: Poor Scaling? Or Configuration Confusion?
Jan 25, 2010 Sun/Solaris Leadership in SAP SD Benchmarks and HP claims
Jan 21, 2010 SPARC Enterprise M4000 PeopleSoft NA Payroll 240K Employees Performance (16 Streams)
Dec 16, 2009 Sun Fire X4640 Delivers World Record x86 Result on SPEC OMPL2001
Nov 24, 2009 Sun M9000 Fastest SAP 2-tier SD Benchmark on current SAP EP4 for SAP ERP 6.0 (Unicode)
Nov 20, 2009 Sun Blade X6275 cluster delivers leading results for Fluent truck_111m benchmark
Nov 20, 2009 Sun Blade 6048 and Sun Blade X6275 NAMD Molecular Dynamics Benchmark beats IBM BlueGene/L
Nov 19, 2009 SPECmail2009: New World record on T5240 1.6GHz Sun 7310 and ZFS
Nov 18, 2009 Sun Flash Accelerator F20 PCIe Card Achieves 100K 4K IOPS and 1.1 GB/sec
Nov 04, 2009 New TPC-C World Record Sun/Oracle
Nov 02, 2009 Sun Blade X6275 Cluster Beats SGI Running Fluent Benchmarks
Nov 02, 2009 Sun Ultra 27 Delivers Leading Single Frame Buffer SPECviewperf 10 Results
Oct 28, 2009 SPC-2 Sun Storage 6780 Array RAID 5 & RAID 6 51% better $/performance than IBM DS5300
Oct 24, 2009 Sun C48 & Lustre fast for Seismic Reverse Time Migration using Sun X6275
Oct 24, 2009 Sun F5100 and Seismic Reverse Time Migration with faster Optimal Checkpointing
Oct 23, 2009 Wiki on performance best practices
Oct 20, 2009 Exadata V2 Information
Oct 15, 2009 Oracle Flash Cache - SGA Caching on Sun Storage F5100
Oct 13, 2009 Oracle Hyperion Sun M5000 and Sun Storage 7410
Oct 13, 2009 Sun T5440 Oracle BI EE Sun SPARC Enterprise T5440 World Record
Oct 13, 2009 SPECweb2005 on Sun SPARC Enterprise T5440 World Record using Solaris Containers and Sun Storage F5100 Flash
Oct 13, 2009 Oracle PeopleSoft Payroll (NA) Sun SPARC Enterprise M4000 and Sun Storage F5100 World Record Performance
Oct 13, 2009 SAP 2-tier SD Benchmark on Sun SPARC Enterprise M9000/32 SPARC64 VII
Oct 13, 2009 CP2K Life Sciences, Ab-initio Dynamics - Sun Blade 6048 Chassis with Sun Blade X6275 - Scalability and Throughput with Quad Data Rate InfiniBand
Oct 13, 2009 SAP 2-tier SD-Parallel on Sun Blade X6270 1-node, 2-node and 4-node
Oct 13, 2009 Halliburton ProMAX Oil & Gas Application Fast on Sun 6048/X6275 Cluster
Oct 13, 2009 SPECcpu2006 Results On MSeries Servers With Updated SPARC64 VII Processors
Oct 12, 2009 MCAE ABAQUS faster on Sun F5100 and Sun X4270 - Single Node World Record
Oct 12, 2009 MCAE ANSYS faster on Sun F5100 and Sun X4270
Oct 12, 2009 MCAE MCS/NASTRAN faster on Sun F5100 and Fire X4270
Oct 12, 2009 SPC-2 Sun Storage 6180 Array RAID 5 & RAID 6 Over 70% Better Price Performance than IBM
Oct 12, 2009 SPC-1 Sun Storage 6180 Array Over 70% Better Price Performance than IBM
Oct 12, 2009 Why Sun Storage F5100 is a good option for Peoplesoft NA Payroll Application
Oct 11, 2009 1.6 Million 4K IOPS in 1RU on Sun Storage F5100 Flash Array
Oct 11, 2009 TPC-C World Record Sun - Oracle
Oct 09, 2009 X6275 Cluster Demonstrates Performance and Scalability on WRF 2.5km CONUS Dataset
Oct 02, 2009 Sun X4270 VMware VMmark benchmark achieves excellent result
Sep 22, 2009 Sun X4270 Virtualized for Two-tier SAP ERP 6.0 Enhancement Pack 4 (Unicode) Standard Sales and Distribution (SD) Benchmark
Sep 01, 2009 String Searching - Sun T5240 & T5440 Outperform IBM Cell Broadband Engine
Aug 28, 2009 Sun X4270 World Record SAP-SD 2-Processor Two-tier SAP ERP 6.0 EP 4 (Unicode)
Aug 27, 2009 Sun SPARC Enterprise T5240 with 1.6GHz UltraSPARC T2 Plus Beats 4-Chip IBM Power 570 POWER6 System on SPECjbb2005
Aug 26, 2009 Sun SPARC Enterprise T5220 with 1.6GHz UltraSPARC T2 Sets Single Chip World Record on SPECjbb2005
Aug 12, 2009 SPECmail2009 on Sun SPARC Enterprise T5240 and Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.3
Jul 23, 2009 World Record Performance of Sun CMT Servers
Jul 22, 2009 Why does 1.6 beat 4.7?
Jul 21, 2009 Zeus ZXTM Traffic Manager World Record on Sun T5240
Jul 21, 2009 Sun T5440 Oracle BI EE World Record Performance
Jul 21, 2009 Sun T5440 World Record SAP-SD 4-Processor Two-tier SAP ERP 6.0 EP 4 (Unicode)
Jul 21, 2009 1.6 GHz SPEC CPU2006 - Rate Benchmarks
Jul 21, 2009 Sun Blade T6320 World Record SPECjbb2005 performance
Jul 21, 2009 New SPECjAppServer2004 Performance on the Sun SPARC Enterprise T5440
Jul 20, 2009 Sun T5440 SPECjbb2005 Beats IBM POWER6 Chip-to-Chip
Jul 20, 2009 New CMT results coming soon....
Jul 14, 2009 Vdbench: Sun StorageTek Vdbench, a storage I/O workload generator.
Jul 14, 2009 Storage performance and workload analysis using Swat.
Jul 10, 2009 World Record TPC-H@300GB Price-Performance for Windows on Sun Fire X4600 M2
Jul 06, 2009 Sun Blade 6048 Chassis with Sun Blade X6275: RADIOSS Benchmark Results
Jul 03, 2009 SPECmail2009 on Sun Fire X4275+Sun Storage 7110: Mail Server System Solution
Jun 30, 2009 Sun Blade 6048 and Sun Blade X6275 NAMD Molecular Dynamics Benchmark beats IBM BlueGene/L
Jun 26, 2009 Sun Fire X2270 Cluster Fluent Benchmark Results
Jun 25, 2009 Sun SSD Server Platform Bandwidth and IOPS (Speeds & Feeds)
Jun 24, 2009 I/O analysis using DTrace
Jun 23, 2009 New CPU2006 Records: 3x better integer throughput, 9x better fp throughput
Jun 23, 2009 Sun Blade X6275 results capture Top Places in CPU2006 SPEED Metrics
Jun 19, 2009 Pointers to Java Performance Tuning resources
Jun 19, 2009 SSDs in HPC: Reducing the I/O Bottleneck BluePrint Best Practices
Jun 17, 2009 The Performance Technology group wiki is alive!
Jun 17, 2009 Performance of Sun 7410 and 7310 Unified Storage Array Line
Jun 16, 2009 Sun Fire X2270 MSC/Nastran Vendor_2008 Benchmarks
Jun 15, 2009 Sun Fire X4600 M2 Server Two-tier SAP ERP 6.0 (Unicode) Standard Sales and Distribution (SD) Benchmark
Jun 12, 2009 Correctly comparing SAP-SD Benchmark results
Jun 12, 2009 OpenSolaris Beats Linux on memcached Sun Fire X2270
Jun 11, 2009 SAS Grid Computing 9.2 utilizing the Sun Storage 7410 Unified Storage System
Jun 10, 2009 Using Solaris Resource Management Utilities to Improve Application Performance
Jun 09, 2009 Free Compiler Wins Nehalem Race by 2x
Jun 08, 2009 Variety of benchmark results to be posted on BestPerf
Jun 05, 2009 Interpreting Sun's SPECpower_ssj2008 Publications
Jun 03, 2009 Wide Variety of Topics to be discussed on BestPerf
Jun 03, 2009 Welcome to BestPerf group blog!

Monday Jul 01, 2013

Quick Note about Blog Posting from John

Please have a look at John's Blog if you are interested in SPEC performance and how people use it in different ways to come to different conclusions.

Wednesday Jun 12, 2013

SPARC T5-4 Produces World Record Single Server TPC-H @3000GB Benchmark Result

Oracle's SPARC T5-4 server delivered world record single server performance of 409,721 QphH@3000GB with price/performance of $3.94/QphH@3000GB on the TPC-H @3000GB benchmark. This result shows that the 4-chip SPARC T5-4 server is significantly faster than the 8-chip server results from IBM (POWER7 based) and HP (Intel x86 based).

This result demonstrates a complete data warehouse solution that shows the performance both of individual and concurrent query processing streams, faster loading, and refresh of the data during business operations. The SPARC T5-4 server delivers superior performance and cost efficiency when compared to the IBM POWER7 result.

  • The SPARC T5-4 server with four SPARC T5 processors is 2.1 times faster than the IBM Power 780 server with eight POWER7 processors and 2.5 times faster than the HP ProLiant DL980 G7 server with eight x86 processors on the TPC-H @3000GB benchmark. The SPARC T5-4 server also delivered better performance per core than these eight processor systems from IBM and HP.

  • The SPARC T5-4 server with four SPARC T5 processors is 2.1 times faster than the IBM Power 780 server with eight POWER7 processors on the TPC-H @3000GB benchmark.

  • The SPARC T5-4 server costs 38% less per $/QphH@3000GB compared to the IBM Power 780 server with the TPC-H @3000GB benchmark.

  • The SPARC T5-4 server took 2 hours, 6 minutes, 4 seconds for data loading while the IBM Power 780 server took 2.8 times longer.

  • The SPARC T5-4 server executed the first refresh function (RF1) in 19.4 seconds, the IBM Power 780 server took 7.6 times longer.

  • The SPARC T5-4 server with four SPARC T5 processors is 2.5 times faster than the HP ProLiant DL980 G7 server with the same number of cores on the TPC-H @3000GB benchmark.

  • The SPARC T5-4 server took 2 hours, 6 minutes, 4 seconds for data loading while the HP ProLiant DL980 G7 server took 4.1 times longer.

  • The SPARC T5-4 server executed the first refresh function (RF1) in 19.4 seconds, the HP ProLiant DL980 G7 server took 8.9 times longer.

  • The SPARC T5-4 server delivered 6% better performance than the SPARC Enterprise M9000-64 server and 2.1 times better than the SPARC Enterprise M9000-32 server on the TPC-H @3000GB benchmark.

Performance Landscape

The table lists the leading TPC-H @3000GB results for non-clustered systems.

TPC-H @3000GB, Non-Clustered Systems
System
Processor
P/C/T – Memory
Composite
(QphH)
$/perf
($/QphH)
Power
(QppH)
Throughput
(QthH)
Database Available
SPARC T5-4
3.6 GHz SPARC T5
4/64/512 – 2048 GB
409,721.8 $3.94 345,762.7 485,512.1 Oracle 11g R2 09/24/13
SPARC Enterprise M9000
3.0 GHz SPARC64 VII+
64/256/256 – 1024 GB
386,478.3 $18.19 316,835.8 471,428.6 Oracle 11g R2 09/22/11
SPARC T4-4
3.0 GHz SPARC T4
4/32/256 – 1024 GB
205,792.0 $4.10 190,325.1 222,515.9 Oracle 11g R2 05/31/12
SPARC Enterprise M9000
2.88 GHz SPARC64 VII
32/128/256 – 512 GB
198,907.5 $15.27 182,350.7 216,967.7 Oracle 11g R2 12/09/10
IBM Power 780
4.1 GHz POWER7
8/32/128 – 1024 GB
192,001.1 $6.37 210,368.4 175,237.4 Sybase 15.4 11/30/11
HP ProLiant DL980 G7
2.27 GHz Intel Xeon X7560
8/64/128 – 512 GB
162,601.7 $2.68 185,297.7 142,685.6 SQL Server 2008 10/13/10

P/C/T = Processors, Cores, Threads
QphH = the Composite Metric (bigger is better)
$/QphH = the Price/Performance metric in USD (smaller is better)
QppH = the Power Numerical Quantity
QthH = the Throughput Numerical Quantity

The following table lists data load times and refresh function times during the power run.

TPC-H @3000GB, Non-Clustered Systems
Database Load & Database Refresh
System
Processor
Data Loading
(h:m:s)
T5
Advan
RF1
(sec)
T5
Advan
RF2
(sec)
T5
Advan
SPARC T5-4
3.6 GHz SPARC T5
02:06:04 1.0x 19.4 1.0x 22.4 1.0x
IBM Power 780
4.1 GHz POWER7
05:51:50 2.8x 147.3 7.6x 133.2 5.9x
HP ProLiant DL980 G7
2.27 GHz Intel Xeon X7560
08:35:17 4.1x 173.0 8.9x 126.3 5.6x

Data Loading = database load time
RF1 = power test first refresh transaction
RF2 = power test second refresh transaction
T5 Advan = the ratio of time to T5 time

Complete benchmark results found at the TPC benchmark website http://www.tpc.org.

Configuration Summary and Results

Hardware Configuration:

SPARC T5-4 server
4 x SPARC T5 processors (3.6 GHz total of 64 cores, 512 threads)
2 TB memory
2 x internal SAS (2 x 300 GB) disk drives

External Storage:

12 x Sun Storage 2540-M2 array with Sun Storage 2501-M2 expansion trays, each with
24 x 15K RPM 300 GB drives, 2 controllers, 2 GB cache
2 x Brocade 6510 Fibre Channel Switches (48 x 16 Gbs port each)

Software Configuration:

Oracle Solaris 11.1
Oracle Database 11g Release 2 Enterprise Edition

Audited Results:

Database Size: 3000 GB (Scale Factor 3000)
TPC-H Composite: 409,721.8 QphH@3000GB
Price/performance: $3.94/QphH@3000GB
Available: 09/24/2013
Total 3 year Cost: $1,610,564
TPC-H Power: 345,762.7
TPC-H Throughput: 485,512.1
Database Load Time: 2:06:04

Benchmark Description

The TPC-H benchmark is a performance benchmark established by the Transaction Processing Council (TPC) to demonstrate Data Warehousing/Decision Support Systems (DSS). TPC-H measurements are produced for customers to evaluate the performance of various DSS systems. These queries and updates are executed against a standard database under controlled conditions. Performance projections and comparisons between different TPC-H Database sizes (100GB, 300GB, 1000GB, 3000GB, 10000GB, 30000GB and 100000GB) are not allowed by the TPC.

TPC-H is a data warehousing-oriented, non-industry-specific benchmark that consists of a large number of complex queries typical of decision support applications. It also includes some insert and delete activity that is intended to simulate loading and purging data from a warehouse. TPC-H measures the combined performance of a particular database manager on a specific computer system.

The main performance metric reported by TPC-H is called the TPC-H Composite Query-per-Hour Performance Metric (QphH@SF, where SF is the number of GB of raw data, referred to as the scale factor). QphH@SF is intended to summarize the ability of the system to process queries in both single and multiple user modes. The benchmark requires reporting of price/performance, which is the ratio of the total HW/SW cost plus 3 years maintenance to the QphH. A secondary metric is the storage efficiency, which is the ratio of total configured disk space in GB to the scale factor.

Key Points and Best Practices

  • Twelve of Oracle's Sun Storage 2540-M2 arrays with Sun Storage 2501-M2 expansion trays were used for the benchmark. Each contains 24 15K RPM drives and is connected to a single dual port 16Gb FC HBA using 2 ports through a Brocade 6510 Fibre Channel switch.

  • The SPARC T5-4 server achieved a peak IO rate of 33 GB/sec from the Oracle database configured with this storage.

  • Oracle Solaris 11.1 required very little system tuning.

  • Some vendors try to make the point that storage ratios are of customer concern. However, storage ratio size has more to do with disk layout and the increasing capacities of disks – so this is not an important metric when comparing systems.

  • The SPARC T5-4 server and Oracle Solaris efficiently managed the system load of two thousand Oracle Database parallel processes.

  • Six Sun Storage 2540-M2/2501-M2 arrays were mirrored to another six Sun Storage 2540-M2/25001-M2 arrays on which all of the Oracle database files were placed. IO performance was high and balanced across all the arrays.

  • The TPC-H Refresh Function (RF) simulates periodical refresh portion of Data Warehouse by adding new sales and deleting old sales data. Parallel DML (parallel insert and delete in this case) and database log performance are a key for this function and the SPARC T5-4 server outperformed both the IBM POWER7 server and HP ProLiant DL980 G7 server. (See the RF columns above.)

See Also

Disclosure Statement

TPC-H, QphH, $/QphH are trademarks of Transaction Processing Performance Council (TPC). For more information, see www.tpc.org, results as of 6/7/13. Prices are in USD. SPARC T5-4 www.tpc.org/3288; SPARC T4-4 www.tpc.org/3278; SPARC Enterprise M9000 www.tpc.org/3262; SPARC Enterprise M9000 www.tpc.org/3258; IBM Power 780 www.tpc.org/3277; HP ProLiant DL980 www.tpc.org/3285. 

Wednesday May 01, 2013

SPARC T5-8 Delivers Best Single System SPECjEnterprise2010 Benchmark, Beats IBM

Oracle produced a world record single-server SPECjEnterprise2010 benchmark result of 27,843.57 SPECjEnterprise2010 EjOPS using one of Oracle's SPARC T5-8 servers for both the application and the database tier. This result directly compares the 8-chip SPARC T5-8 server (8 SPARC T5 processors) to the 8-chip IBM Power 780 server (8 POWER7+ processor).

  • The 8-chip SPARC T5 processor based server is 2.6x faster than the 8-chip IBM POWER7+ processor based server.

  • Both Oracle and IBM used virtualization to provide 4-chips for application and 4-chips for database.

  • The server cost/performance for the SPARC T5 processor based server was 6.9x better than the server cost/performance of the IBM POWER7+ processor based server. The cost/performance of the SPARC T5-8 server is $10.72 compared to the IBM Power 780 at $73.83.

  • The total configuration cost/performance (hardware+software) for the SPARC T5 processor based server was 3.6x better than the IBM POWER7+ processor based server. The cost/performance of the SPARC T5-8 server is $56.21 compared to the IBM Power 780 at $199.42. The IBM system had 1.6x better performance per core, but this did not reduce the total software and hardware cost to the customer. As shown by this comparison, performance-per-core is a poor predictor of characteristics relevant to customers.

  • The total IBM hardware plus software cost was $2,174,152 versus the total Oracle hardware plus software cost of $1,565,092. At this price IBM could only provide 768 GB of memory while Oracle was able to deliver 2 TB in the SPARC T5-8 server.

  • The SPARC T5-8 server requires only 8 rack units, the same as the space of the IBM Power 780. In this configuration IBM has a hardware core density of 4 cores per rack unit which contrasts with the 16 cores per rack unit for the SPARC T5-8 server. This again demonstrates why performance-per-core is a poor predictor of characteristics relevant to customers.

  • The virtualized SPARC T5 processor based server ran the application tier servers on 4 chips using Oracle Solaris Zones and the database tier in a 4-chip Oracle Solaris Zone. The virtualized IBM POWER7+ processor based server ran the application in a 4-chip LPAR and the database in a 4-chip LPAR.

  • The SPARC T5-8 server ran the Oracle Solaris 11.1 operating system and used Oracle Solaris Zones to consolidate eight Oracle WebLogic application server instances and one database server instance to achieve this result. The IBM system used LPARS and AIX V7.1.

  • This result demonstrated less than 1 second average response times for all SPECjEnterprise2010 transactions and represents JEE 5.0 transactions generated by 227,500 users.

  • The application server used Oracle Fusion Middleware components including the Oracle WebLogic 12.1 application server and Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM on Solaris, version 1.7.0_15. The database server was configured with Oracle Database 11g Release 2.

  • IBM has a non-virtualized result (one server for application and one server for database). The IBM PowerLinux 7R2 achieved 13,161.07 SPECjEnterprise2010 EjOPS which means it was 2.1x slower than the SPARC T5-8 server. The total configuration cost/performance (hardware+software) for the SPARC T5 processor based server was 11% better than the IBM POWER7+ processor based server. The cost/performance of the SPARC T5-8 server is $56.21 compared to the IBM PowerLinux 7R2 at $62.26. As shown by this comparison, performance-per-core is a poor predictor of characteristics relevant to customers.

Performance Landscape

Complete benchmark results are at the SPEC website, SPECjEnterprise2010 Results.

SPECjEnterprise2010 Performance Chart
Only Two Virtualized Results (App+DB on 1 Server) as of 5/1/2013
Submitter EjOPS* Java EE Server & DB Server
Oracle 27,843.57 1 x SPARC T5-8
8 chips, 128 cores, 3.6 GHz SPARC T5
Oracle WebLogic 12c (12.1.1)
Oracle Database 11g (11.2.0.3)
IBM 10,902.30 1 x IBM Power 780
8 chips, 32 cores, 4.42 GHz POWER7+
WebSphere Application Server V8.5
IBM DB2 Universal Database 10.1

* SPECjEnterprise2010 EjOPS (bigger is better)

Configuration Summary

Oracle Summary

Application and Database Server:

1 x SPARC T5-8 server, with
8 x 3.6 GHz SPARC T5 processors
2 TB memory
5 x 10 GbE dual-port NIC
6 x 8 Gb dual-port HBA
Oracle Solaris 11.1 SRU 4.5
Oracle WebLogic Server 12c (12.1.1)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM on Solaris, version 1.7.0_15
Oracle Database 11g (11.2.0.3)

Storage Servers:

6 x Sun Server X3-2L (12-Drive), with
2 x 2.4 GHz Intel Xeon
16 GB memory
1 x 8 Gb FC HBA
4 x Sun Flash Accelerator F40 PCI-E Card
Oracle Solaris 11.1

2 x Sun Storage 2540-M2 Array
12 x 600 GB 15K RPM SAS HDD

Switch Hardware:

1 x Sun Network 10 GbE 72-port Top of Rack (ToR) Switch

IBM Summary

Application and Database Server:

1 x IBM Power 780 server, with
8 x 4.42 GHz POWER7+ processors
786 GB memory
6 x 10 GbE dual-port NIC
3 x 8 Gb four-port HBA
IBM AIX V7.1 TL2
IBM WebSphere Application Server V8.5
IBM J9 VM (build 2.6, JRE 1.7.0 IBM J9 AIX ppc-32)
IBM DB2 10.1
IBM InfoSphere Optim pureQuery Runtime v3.1.1

Storage:

2 x DS5324 Disk System with
48 x 146GB 15K E-DDM Disks

1 x v7000 Disk Controller with
16 x 400GB SSD Disks

Benchmark Description

SPECjEnterprise2010 is the third generation of the SPEC organization's J2EE end-to-end industry standard benchmark application. The new SPECjEnterprise2010 benchmark has been re-designed and developed to cover the Java EE 5 specification's significantly expanded and simplified programming model, highlighting the major features used by developers in the industry today. This provides a real world workload driving the Application Server's implementation of the Java EE specification to its maximum potential and allowing maximum stressing of the underlying hardware and software systems,
  • The web zone, servlets, and web services
  • The EJB zone
  • JPA 1.0 Persistence Model
  • JMS and Message Driven Beans
  • Transaction management
  • Database connectivity
Moreover, SPECjEnterprise2010 also heavily exercises all parts of the underlying infrastructure that make up the application environment, including hardware, JVM software, database software, JDBC drivers, and the system network.

The primary metric of the SPECjEnterprise2010 benchmark is jEnterprise Operations Per Second (SPECjEnterprise2010 EjOPS). The primary metric for the SPECjEnterprise2010 benchmark is calculated by adding the metrics of the Dealership Management Application in the Dealer Domain and the Manufacturing Application in the Manufacturing Domain. There is NO price/performance metric in this benchmark.

Key Points and Best Practices

  • Eight Oracle WebLogic server instances on the SPARC T5-8 server were hosted in 8 separate Oracle Solaris Zones to demonstrate consolidation of multiple application servers. The 8 zones were bound to 4 resource pools using 64 cores (4 cpu chips).
  • The database ran in a separate Oracle Solaris Zone bound to a resource pool consisting 64 cores (4 cpu chips). The database shadow processes were run in the FX scheduling class and bound to one of four cpu chips using the plgrp command.
  • The Oracle WebLogic application servers were executed in the FX scheduling class to improve performance by reducing the frequency of context switches.
  • The Oracle log writer process was run in the FX scheduling class at processor priority 60 to use the Critical Thread feature.

See Also

Disclosure Statement

SPEC and the benchmark name SPECjEnterprise are registered trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. Results from www.spec.org as of 5/1/2013. SPARC T5-8, 27,843.57 SPECjEnterprise2010 EjOPS; IBM Power 780, 10,902.30 SPECjEnterprise2010 EjOPS; IBM PowerLinux 7R2, 13,161.07 SPECjEnterprise2010 EjOPS. Oracle server only hardware list price is $298,494 and total hardware plus software list price is $1,565,092 from http://www.oracle.com as of  5/22/2013. IBM server only hardware list price is $804,931 and total hardware plus software cost of $2,174,152 based on public pricing from http://www.ibm.com as of 5/22/2013. IBM PowerLinux 7R2 server total hardware plus software cost of $819,451 based on public pricing from http://www.ibm.com as of 5/22/2013.

Friday Mar 29, 2013

SPARC T5 System Performance for Encryption Microbenchmark

The cryptography benchmark suite was internally developed by Oracle to measure the maximum throughput of in-memory, on-chip encryption operations that a system can perform. Multiple threads are used to achieve the maximum throughput. Systems powered by Oracle's SPARC T5 processor show outstanding performance on the tested encryption operations, beating Intel processor based systems.

  • A SPARC T5 processor running Oracle Solaris 11.1 runs from 2.4x to 4.4x faster on AES 256-bit key encryption than the Intel E5-2690 processor running in-memory encryption of 32 KB blocks using CFB128, CBC, CCM and GCM modes fully hardware subscribed.

  • AES CFB mode is used by the Oracle Database 11g for Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) which provides security to database storage.

Performance Landscape

Presented below are results for running encryption using the AES cipher with the CFB, CBC, CCM and GCM modes for key sizes of 128, 192 and 256. Decryption performance was similar and is not presented. Results are presented as MB/sec (10**6).

Encryption Performance – AES-CFB

Performance is presented for in-memory AES-CFB128 mode encryption. Multiple key sizes of 256-bit, 192-bit and 128-bit are presented. The encryption was performance on 32 KB of pseudo-random data (same data for each run).

AES-CFB
Microbenchmark Performance (MB/sec)
Processor GHz Chips Performance Software Environment
AES-256-CFB
SPARC T5 3.60 2 54,396 Oracle Solaris 11.1, libsoftcrypto + libumem
Intel E5-2690 2.90 2 12,823 IPP/AES-NI
AES-192-CFB
SPARC T5 3.60 2 61,000 Oracle Solaris 11.1, libsoftcrypto + libumem
Intel E5-2690 2.90 2 14,928 IPP/AES-NI
AES-128-CFB
SPARC T5 3.60 2 68,695 Oracle Solaris 11.1, libsoftcrypto + libumem
Intel E5-2690 2.90 2 17,824 IPP/AES-NI

Encryption Performance – AES-CBC

Performance is presented for in-memory AES-CBC mode encryption. Multiple key sizes of 256-bit, 192-bit and 128-bit are presented. The encryption was performance on 32 KB of pseudo-random data (same data for each run).

AES-CBC
Microbenchmark Performance (MB/sec)
Processor GHz Chips Performance Software Environment
AES-256-CBC
SPARC T5 3.60 2 56,933 Oracle Solaris 11.1, libsoftcrypto + libumem
Intel E5-2690 2.90 2 12,822 IPP/AES-NI
AES-192-CBC
SPARC T5 3.60 2 63,767 Oracle Solaris 11.1, libsoftcrypto + libumem
Intel E5-2690 2.90 2 14,915 IPP/AES-NI
AES-128-CBC
SPARC T5 3.60 2 72,508 Oracle Solaris 11.1, libsoftcrypto + libumem
SPARC T4 2.85 2 31,085 Oracle Solaris 11.1, libsoftcrypto + libumem
Intel X5690 3.47 2 20,721 IPP/AES-NI
Intel E5-2690 2.90 2 17,823 IPP/AES-NI

Encryption Performance – AES-CCM

Performance is presented for in-memory AES-CCM mode encryption with authentication. Multiple key sizes of 256-bit, 192-bit and 128-bit are presented. The encryption/authentication was performance on 32 KB of pseudo-random data (same data for each run).

AES-CCM
Microbenchmark Performance (MB/sec)
Processor GHz Chips Performance Software Environment
AES-256-CCM
SPARC T5 3.60 2 29,431 Oracle Solaris 11.1, libsoftcrypto + libumem
Intel E5-2690 2.90 2 12,493 IPP/AES-NI
AES-192-CCM
SPARC T5 3.60 2 33,715 Oracle Solaris 11.1, libsoftcrypto + libumem
Intel E5-2690 2.90 2 14,507 IPP/AES-NI
AES-128-CCM
SPARC T5 3.60 2 39,188 Oracle Solaris 11.1, libsoftcrypto + libumem
Intel E5-2690 2.90 2 17,256 IPP/AES-NI

Encryption Performance – AES-GCM

Performance is presented for in-memory AES-GCM mode encryption with authentication. Multiple key sizes of 256-bit, 192-bit and 128-bit are presented. The encryption/authentication was performance on 32 KB of pseudo-random data (same data for each run).

AES-GCM
Microbenchmark Performance (MB/sec)
Processor GHz Chips Performance Software Environment
AES-256-GCM
SPARC T5 3.60 2 34,101 Oracle Solaris 11.1, libsoftcrypto + libumem
Intel E5-2690 2.90 2 13,520 IPP/AES-NI
AES-192-GCM
SPARC T5 3.60 2 36,852 Oracle Solaris 11.1, libsoftcrypto + libumem
Intel E5-2690 2.90 2 14,159 IPP/AES-NI
AES-128-GCM
SPARC T5 3.60 2 39,003 Oracle Solaris 11.1, libsoftcrypto + libumem
Intel E5-2690 2.90 2 14,877 IPP/AES-NI

Configuration Summary

SPARC T5-2 server
2 x SPARC T5 processor, 3.6 GHz
512 GB memory
Oracle Solaris 11.1 SRU 4.2

Sun Server X3-2 server
2 x E5-2690 processors, 2.90 GHz
128 GB memory

Benchmark Description

The benchmark measures cryptographic capabilities in terms of general low-level encryption, in-memory and on-chip using various ciphers, including AES-128-CFB, AES-192-CFB, AES-256-CFB, AES-128-CBC, AES-192-CBC, AES-256-CBC, AES-128-CCM, AES-192-CCM, AES-256-CCM, AES-128-GCM, AES-192-GCM and AES-256-GCM.

The benchmark results were obtained using tests created by Oracle which use various application interfaces to perform the various ciphers. They were run using optimized libraries for each platform to obtain the best possible performance.

See Also

Disclosure Statement

Copyright 2013, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Oracle and Java are registered trademarks of Oracle and/or its affiliates. Other names may be trademarks of their respective owners. Results as of 3/26/2013.

Tuesday Mar 26, 2013

SPARC T5-8 Produces TPC-C Benchmark Single-System World Record Performance

Oracle's SPARC T5-8 server equipped with eight 3.6 GHz SPARC T5 processors obtained a result of 8,552,523 tpmC on the TPC-C benchmark. This result is a world record for single servers. Oracle demonstrated this world record database performance running Oracle Database 11g Release 2 Enterprise Edition with Partitioning.

  • The SPARC T5-8 server delivered a single system TPC-C world record of 8,552,523 tpmC with a price performance of $0.55/tpmC using Oracle Database 11g Release 2. This configuration is available 09/25/13.

  • The SPARC T5-8 server has 2.8x times better performance than the 4-processor IBM x3850 X5 system equipped with Intel Xeon processors.

  • The SPARC T5-8 server delivers 1.7x the performance compared to the next best eight processor result.

  • The SPARC T5-8 server delivers 2.4x the performance per chip compared to the IBM Power 780 3-node cluster result.

  • The SPARC T5-8 server delivers 1.8x the performance per chip compared to the IBM Power 780 non-clustered result.

  • The SPARC T5-8 server delivers 1.4x the performance per chip compared to the IBM Flex x240 Xeon result.

  • The SPARC T5-8 server delivers 1.7x the performance per chip compared to the Sun Server X2-8 system equipped with Intel Xeon processors.

  • The SPARC T5-8 server demonstrated over 3.1 Million 4KB IOP/sec with 76% idle, in a separate IO intensive workload, demonstrating its ability process a large IO workload with lots of processing headroom.

  • This result showed Oracle's integrated hardware and software stacks provide industry leading performance.

  • The Oracle solution utilized Oracle Solaris 11.1 with Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition with Partitioning and demonstrates stability and performance with this highly secure operating environment to produce the world record TPC-C benchmark performance.

Performance Landscape

Select TPC-C results (sorted by tpmC, bigger is better)

System p/c/t tpmC Price
/tpmC
Avail Database Memory
Size
IBM Power 780 Cluster 24/192/768 10,366,254 1.38 USD 10/13/2010 IBM DB2 9.7 6 TB
SPARC T5-8 8/128/1024 8,552,523 0.55 USD 9/25/2013 Oracle 11g R2 4 TB
IBM Power 595 32/64/128 6,085,166 2.81 USD 12/10/2008 IBM DB2 9.5 4 TB
Sun Server X2-8 8/80/160 5,055,888 0.89 USD 7/10/2012 Oracle 11g R2 4 TB
IBM x3850 X5 4/40/80 3,014,684 0.59 USD 7/11/2011 IBM DB2 9.7 3 TB
IBM Flex x240 2/16/32 1,503,544 0.53 USD 8/16/2012 IBM DB2 9.7 768 GB
IBM Power 780 2/8/32 1,200,011 0.69 USD 10/13/2010 IBM DB2 9.5 512 GB

p/c/t - processors, cores, threads
Avail - availability date

Oracle and IBM TPC-C Response times

System tpmC Response Time (sec)
New Order 90th%
Response Time (sec)
New Order Average
IBM Power 780 Cluster 10,366,254 2.100 1.137
SPARC T5-8 8,552,523 0.410 0.234
IBM Power 595 6,085,166 1.690 1.220
IBM Power 780 1,200,011 0.694 0.403

Oracle uses Response Time New Order Average and Response Time New Order 90th% for comparison between Oracle and IBM.

Graphs of Oracle's and IBM's Response Time New Order Average and Response Time New Order 90th% can be found in the full disclosure reports on TPC's website TPC-C Official Result Page.

Configuration Summary and Results

Hardware Configuration:

Server
SPARC T5-8
8 x 3.6 GHz SPARC T5
4 TB memory
2 x 600 GB 10K RPM SAS2 internal disks
12 x 8 Gbs FC HBA

Data Storage
54 x Sun Server X3-2L systems configured as COMSTAR heads, each with
2 x 2.4 GHz Intel Xeon E5-2609 processors
16 GB memory
4 x Sun Flash Accelerator F40 PCIe Cards (400 GB each)
12 x 3 TB 7.2K RPM 3.5" SAS disks
2 x 600 GB 10K RPM SAS2 disks
2 x Brocade 6510 switches

Redo Storage
2 x Sun Server X3-2L systems configured as COMSTAR heads, each with
2 x 2.4 GHz Intel Xeon E5-2609 processors
16 GB memory
12 x 3 TB 7.2K RPM 3.5" SAS disks
2 x 600 GB 10K RPM SAS2 disks

Clients
16 x Sun Server X3-2 servers, each with
2 x 2.9 GHz Intel Xeon E5-2690 processors
64 GB memory
2 x 600 GB 10K RPM SAS2 disks

Software Configuration:

Oracle Solaris 11.1 SRU 4.5 (for SPARC T5-8)
Oracle Solaris 11.1 (for COMSTAR systems)
Oracle Database 11g Release 2 Enterprise Edition with Partitioning
Oracle iPlanet Web Server 7.0 U5
Oracle Tuxedo CFS-R

Results:

System: SPARC T5-8
tpmC: 8,552,523
Price/tpmC: 0.55 USD
Available: 9/25/2013
Database: Oracle Database 11g
Cluster: no
Response Time New Order Average: 0.234 seconds

Benchmark Description

TPC-C is an OLTP system benchmark. It simulates a complete environment where a population of terminal operators executes transactions against a database. The benchmark is centered around the principal activities (transactions) of an order-entry environment. These transactions include entering and delivering orders, recording payments, checking the status of orders, and monitoring the level of stock at the warehouses.

Key Points and Best Practices

  • Oracle Database 11g Release 2 Enterprise Edition with Partitioning scales easily to this high level of performance.

  • COMSTAR (Common Multiprotocol SCSI Target) is the software framework that enables an Oracle Solaris host to serve as a SCSI Target platform. COMSTAR uses a modular approach to break the huge task of handling all the different pieces in a SCSI target subsystem into independent functional modules which are glued together by the SCSI Target Mode Framework (STMF). The modules implementing functionality at SCSI level (disk, tape, medium changer etc.) are not required to know about the underlying transport. And the modules implementing the transport protocol (FC, iSCSI, etc.) are not aware of the SCSI-level functionality of the packets they are transporting. The framework hides the details of allocation providing execution context and cleanup of SCSI commands and associated resources and simplifies the task of writing the SCSI or transport modules.

  • Oracle iPlanet Web Server middleware is used for the client tier of the benchmark. Each web server instance supports more than a quarter-million users while satisfying the response time requirement from the TPC-C benchmark.

See Also

Disclosure Statement

TPC Benchmark C, tpmC, and TPC-C are trademarks of the Transaction Processing Performance Council (TPC). SPARC T5-8 (8/128/1024) with Oracle Database 11g Release 2 Enterprise Edition with Partitioning, 8,552,523 tpmC, $0.55 USD/tpmC, available 9/25/2013. IBM Power 780 Cluster (24/192/768) with DB2 ESE 9.7, 10,366,254 tpmC, $1.38 USD/tpmC, available 10/13/2010. IBM x3850 X5 (4/40/80) with DB2 ESE 9.7, 3,014,684 tpmC, $0.59 USD/tpmC, available 7/11/2011. IBM x3850 X5 (4/32/64) with DB2 ESE 9.7, 2,308,099 tpmC, $0.60 USD/tpmC, available 5/20/2011. IBM Flex x240 (2/16/32) with DB2 ESE 9.7, 1,503,544 tpmC, $0.53 USD/tpmC, available 8/16/2012. IBM Power 780 (2/8/32) with IBM DB2 9.5, 1,200,011 tpmC, $0.69 USD/tpmC, available 10/13/2010. Source: http://www.tpc.org/tpcc, results as of 3/26/2013.

SPARC T5-8 Delivers SPECjEnterprise2010 Benchmark World Record Performance

Oracle produced a world record SPECjEnterprise2010 benchmark result of 57,422.17 SPECjEnterprise2010 EjOPS using Oracle's SPARC T5-8 server in the application tier and another SPARC T5-8 server for the database tier.

  • The SPARC T5-8 server demonstrated 3.4x better performance compared to an 8-socket IBM Power 780 server result of 16,646.34 SPECjEnterprise2010 EjOPS. The SPARC T5-8 is 3.7x less expensive for the application server hardware list cost compared to the IBM configuration.

  • The SPARC T5 processor demonstrated 1.7x better performance per core compared to the POWER7 processor used in the IBM Power 780 SPECjEnterprise2010 result.

  • The SPARC T5-8 server demonstrated 2.2x better performance compared to the Cisco UCS B440 M2 Blade Server result of 26,118.67 SPECjEnterprise2010 EjOPS.

  • The SPARC T5-8 servers used in the application and database tiers ran the Oracle Solaris 11.1 operating system.

  • The SPARC T5-8 server for the application tier used Oracle Solaris Zones to consolidate sixteen Oracle WebLogic Server instances to achieve this result.

  • This result demonstrated less than 1 second response time for all SPECjEnterprise2010 transactions, while demonstrating a sustained load of Java EE 5 transactions equivalent to 468,000 users.

  • The SPARC T5-8 application server used Oracle Fusion Middleware components including the Oracle WebLogic 12.1 application server and Oracle JDK 7 Update 15. The SPARC T5-8 database server was configured with Oracle Database 11g Release 2.

  • This result used six Sun Server X3-2L systems each configured with 4 x 400 GB Sun Flash Accelerator F40 PCIe Card devices as storage servers for the database files.

  • This result represents the best performance/socket for a single system in the application tier of 7,177.77 SPECjEnterprise2010 EjOPS per socket.

  • A single SPARC T5-8 server in the application tier producing 57,422.17 SPECjEnterprise2010 EjOPS can replace a total of 4x SPARC T4-4 servers that obtained 40,104.86 SPECjEnterprise2010 EjOPS. A single SPARC T5-8 server in the application tier producing 57,422.17 SPECjEnterprise2010 EjOPS can replace 6x SPARC T3-4 servers where each SPARC T3-4 server obtained 9,456.28 SPECjEnterprise2010 EjOPS.

  • Oracle Fusion Middleware provides a family of complete, integrated, hot pluggable and best-of-breed products known for enabling enterprise customers to create and run agile and intelligent business applications. Oracle WebLogic Server's on-going, record-setting Java application server performance demonstrates why so many customers rely on Oracle Fusion Middleware as their foundation for innovation.

Performance Landscape

Complete benchmark results are at the SPEC website, SPECjEnterprise2010 Results.

SPECjEnterprise2010 Performance Chart
as of 3/26/2013
Submitter EjOPS* Java EE Server DB Server
Oracle 57,422.17 1 x SPARC T5-8
8 chips, 128 cores, 3.6 GHz SPARC T5
Oracle WebLogic 12c (12.1.1)
1 x SPARC T5-8
8 chips, 128 cores, 3.6 GHz SPARC T5
Oracle Database 11g (11.2.0.3)
Oracle 40,104.86 4 x SPARC T4-4
4 chips, 32 cores, 3.0 GHz SPARC T4
Oracle WebLogic 11g (10.3.5)
2 x SPARC T4-4
4 chips, 32 cores, 3.0 GHz SPARC T4
Oracle Database 11g (11.2.0.2)
Oracle 27,150.05 1x Sun Server X2-8
8x 2.4 GHz Intel Xeon E7-8870
Oracle WebLogic 12c
1x Sun Server X2-4
4x 2.4 GHz Intel Xeon E7-4870
Oracle Database 11g (11.2.0.2)
Cisco 26,118.67 2 x Cisco UCS B440 M2
4 chips, 40 cores, 2.4 GHz Xeon E7-4870
Oracle WebLogic 11g (10.3.5)
1 x Cisco UCS C460 M2
4 chips, 40 cores, 2.4 GHz Xeon E7-4870
Oracle Database 11g (11.2.0.2)
IBM 16,646.34 1 x IBM Power 780
8 chips, 64 cores, 3.86 GHz POWER7
WebSphere Application Server V7.0
1 x IBM Power 750 Express
4 chips, 32 cores, 3.55 GHz POWER7
IBM DB2 Universal Database 9.7

* SPECjEnterprise2010 EjOPS (bigger is better)

Configuration Summary

Application Server:

1 x SPARC T5-8 server, with
8 x 3.6 GHz SPARC T5 processors
2 TB memory
8 x 10 GbE dual-port NIC
Oracle Solaris 11.1 SRU 4.5
Oracle WebLogic Server 12c (12.1.1)
Oracle JDK 7 Update 15

Database Server:

1 x SPARC T5-8 server, with
8 x 3.6 GHz SPARC T5 processors
2 TB memory
5 x 10 GbE dual-port NIC
6 x 8 Gb FC dual-port HBA
Oracle Solaris 11.1 SRU 4.5
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3

Storage Servers:

6 x Sun Server X3-2L (12-Drive), with
2 x 2.4 GHz Intel Xeon
16 GB memory
1 x 8 Gb FC HBA
4 x Sun Flash Accelerator F40 PCI-E Card
Oracle Solaris 11.1

2 x Sun Storage 2540-M2 Array
12 x 600 GB 15K RPM SAS HDD

Switch Hardware:

1 x Sun Network 10 GbE 72-port Top of Rack (ToR) Switch

Benchmark Description

SPECjEnterprise2010 is the third generation of the SPEC organization's J2EE end-to-end industry standard benchmark application. The new SPECjEnterprise2010 benchmark has been re-designed and developed to cover the Java EE 5 specification's significantly expanded and simplified programming model, highlighting the major features used by developers in the industry today. This provides a real world workload driving the Application Server's implementation of the Java EE specification to its maximum potential and allowing maximum stressing of the underlying hardware and software systems,
  • The web zone, servlets, and web services
  • The EJB zone
  • JPA 1.0 Persistence Model
  • JMS and Message Driven Beans
  • Transaction management
  • Database connectivity
Moreover, SPECjEnterprise2010 also heavily exercises all parts of the underlying infrastructure that make up the application environment, including hardware, JVM software, database software, JDBC drivers, and the system network.

The primary metric of the SPECjEnterprise2010 benchmark is jEnterprise Operations Per Second (SPECjEnterprise2010 EjOPS). The primary metric for the SPECjEnterprise2010 benchmark is calculated by adding the metrics of the Dealership Management Application in the Dealer Domain and the Manufacturing Application in the Manufacturing Domain. There is NO price/performance metric in this benchmark.

Key Points and Best Practices

  • Sixteen Oracle WebLogic server instances on the SPARC T5-8 server were hosted in 16 separate Oracle Solaris Zones to demonstrate consolidation of multiple application servers.
  • Each Oracle Solaris Zone was bound to a separate processor set, each contained total 58 hardware strands. This was done to improve performance by using the physical memory closest to the processors to reduce memory access latency. The default set was used for network and disk interrupt handling.
  • The Oracle WebLogic application servers were executed in the FX scheduling class to improve performance by reducing the frequency of context switches.
  • The Oracle database processes were run in 8 processor sets using psrset(1M) and executed in the FX scheduling class. This improved performance by reducing memory access latency and reducing context switches.
  • The Oracle log writer process was run in a separate processor set containing a single core and run in the RT scheduling class. This insured that the log writer had the most efficient use of CPU resources.

See Also

Disclosure Statement

SPEC and the benchmark name SPECjEnterprise are registered trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. Results from www.spec.org as of 3/26/2013. SPARC T5-8, 57,422.17 SPECjEnterprise2010 EjOPS; SPARC T4-4, 40,104.86 SPECjEnterprise2010 EjOPS; Sun Server X2-8, 27,150.05 SPECjEnterprise2010 EjOPS; Cisco UCS B440 M2, 26,118.67 SPECjEnterprise2010 EjOPS; IBM Power 780, 16,646.34 SPECjEnterprise2010 EjOPS. SPARC T3-4 9456.28 SPECjEnterprise2010 EjOPS.

SPARC T5-8 (SPARC T5-8 Server base package, 8xSPARC T5 16-core processors, 128x16GB-1066 DIMMS, 2x600GB 10K RPM 2.5. SAS-2 HDD, 4x Power Cables) List Price $268,742. IBM Power 780 (IBM Power 780:9179 Model MHB, 8x3.8GHz 16-core, 64x one processor activation, 4xCEC Enclosure with IBM Bezel, I/O Backplane and System Midplane,16x 0/32GB DDR3 Memory (4x8GB) DIMMS-1066MHz Power7 CoD Memory, 12x Activation of 1 GB DDR3 Power7 Memory, 5x Activation of 100GB DDR3 Power7 Memory, 1x Disk/Media Backplane. 2x 146.8GB SAS 15K RPM 2.5. HDD (AIX/Linux only), 4x AC Power Supply 1725W) List Price $992,023. Source: Oracle.com and IBM.com, collected 03/18/2013.

SPARC T5-2 Achieves SPECjbb2013 Benchmark World Record Result

Oracle, using Oracle Solaris and Oracle JDK, delivered a two socket server world record result on the SPECjbb2013 benchmark, Multi-JVM metric. This benchmark was designed by the industry to showcase Java server performance. SPECjbb2013 is the replacement for SPECjbb2005 (SPECjbb2005 will soon be retired by SPEC).

  • Oracle's SPARC T5-2 server achieved 75,658 SPECjbb2013-MultiJVM max-jOPS and 23,268 SPECjbb2013-MultiJVM critical-jOPS on the SPECjbb2013 benchmark. This result is a two chip world record. (Oracle has submitted this result for review by SPEC.)

  • There are no IBM POWER7 or POWER7+ based server results on the SPECjbb2013 benchmark. IBM has published IBM POWER7+ based servers on the SPECjbb2005 which will soon be retired by SPEC.

  • The SPARC T5-2 server running is 1.9x faster than the 2-chip HP ProLiant ML350p server (2.9 GHz E5-2690 Sandy Bridge-based) based on SPECjbb2013-MultiJVM max-jOPS.

  • The 2-chip SPARC T5-2 server is 15% faster than the 4-chip HP ProLiant DL560p server (2.7 GHz E5-4650 Sandy Bridge-based) based on SPECjbb2013-MultiJVM max-jOPS.

  • The 2-chip SPARC T5-2 server is 6.1x faster than the 1-chip HP ProLiant ML310e Gen8 (3.6 GHZ E3-1280v2 Ivy Bridge based) based on SPECjbb2013-MultiJVM max-jOPS.

  • The Sun Server X3-2 system running Oracle Solaris 11 is 5% faster than the HP ProLiant ML350p Gen8 server running Windows Server 2008 based on SPECjbb2013-MultiJVM max-jOPS.

  • Oracle's SPARC T4-2 server achieved 34,804 SPECjbb2013-MultiJVM max-jOPS and 10,101 SPECjbb2013-MultiJVM critical-jOPS on the SPECjbb2013 benchmark.
    (Oracle has submitted this result for review by SPEC.)

  • Oracle's Sun Server X3-2 system achieved 41,954 SPECjbb2013-MultiJVM max-jOPS and 13,305 SPECjbb2013-MultiJVM critical-jOPS on the SPECjbb2013 benchmark. (Oracle has submitted this result for review by SPEC.)

  • Oracle's Sun Server X2-4 system achieved 65,211 SPECjbb2013-MultiJVM max-jOPS and 22,057 SPECjbb2013-MultiJVM critical-jOPS on the SPECjbb2013 benchmark. (Oracle has submitted this result for review by SPEC.)

  • SPECjbb2013 demonstrates better performance on Oracle hardware and software, engineered to work together, than alternatives from HP.

  • These results were obtained using Oracle Solaris 11 along with Java Platform, Standard Edition, JDK 7 Update 17 on the SPARC T5-2 server, SPARC T4-2 server, Sun Server X3-2 and Sun Server X2-4.

From SPEC's press release, "SPECjbb2013 replaces SPECjbb2005. The new benchmark has been developed from the ground up to measure performance based on the latest Java application features. It is expected to be used widely by all those interested in Java server performance, including JVM vendors, hardware developers, Java application developers, researchers and members of the academic community."

Performance Landscape

Results of SPECjbb2013 from www.spec.org as of March 26, 2013 and this report.

SPECjbb2013
System Processor SPECjbb2013-MultiJVM OS JDK
max-jOPS critical-jOPS
SPARC T5-2 2 x SPARC T5 75,658 23,334 Oracle Solaris 11.1 Oracle JDK 7u17
HP DL560p Gen8 4 x Intel E5-4650 66,007 16,577 Windows 2008 R2 Oracle JDK 7u15
Sun Server X2-4 4 x Intel E7-4870 65,211 22,057 Oracle Solaris 11.1 Oracle JDK 7u17
Sun Server X3-2 2 x Intel E5-2690 41,954 13,305 Oracle Solaris 11.1 Oracle JDK 7u17
HP ML350p Gen8 2 x Intel E5-2690 40,047 12,308 Windows 2008 R2 Oracle JDK 7u15
SPARC T4-2 2 x SPARC T4 34,804 10,101 Oracle Solaris 11.1 Oracle JDK 7u17
Supermicro X8DTN+ 2 x Intel E5690 20,977 6,188 RHEL 6.3 Oracle JDK 7u11
HP ML310e Gen8 1 x Intel E3-1280v2 12,315 2,908 Windows 2008 R2 Oracle JDK 7u15
Intel R1304BT 1 x Intel 1260L 6,198 1,722 Windows 2008 R2 Oracle JDK 7u11

The above table represents all of the published results on www.spec.org. SPEC allows for self publication of SPECjbb2013 results.

Configuration Summary

Systems Under Test:

SPARC T5-2 server
2 x SPARC T5, 3.60 GHz
512 GB memory (32 x 16 GB dimms)
Oracle Solaris 11.1
Oracle JDK 7 Update 17

Sun Server X2-4
4 x Intel Xeon E7-4870, 2.40 GHz
Hyper-Threading enabled
Turbo Boost enabled
128 GB memory (32 x 4 GB dimms)
Oracle Solaris 11.1
Oracle JDK 7 Update 17

Sun Server X3-2
2 x Intel E5-2690, 2.90 GHz
Hyper-Threading enabled
Turbo Boost enabled
128 GB memory (32 x 4 GB dimms)
Oracle Solaris 11.1
Oracle JDK 7 Update 17

SPARC T4-2 server
2 x SPARC T4, 2.85 GHz
256 GB memory (32 x 8 GB dimms)
Oracle Solaris 11.1
Oracle JDK 7 Update 17

Benchmark Description

The SPECjbb2013 benchmark has been developed from the ground up to measure performance based on the latest Java application features. It is relevant to all audiences who are interested in Java server performance, including JVM vendors, hardware developers, Java application developers, researchers and members of the academic community.

SPECjbb2013 replaces SPECjbb2005. New features include:

  • A usage model based on a world-wide supermarket company with an IT infrastructure that handles a mix of point-of-sale requests, online purchases and data-mining operations.
  • Both a pure throughput metric and a metric that measures critical throughput under service-level agreements (SLAs) specifying response times ranging from 10ms to 500ms.
  • Support for multiple run configurations, enabling users to analyze and overcome bottlenecks at multiple layers of the system stack, including hardware, OS, JVM and application layers.
  • Exercising new Java 7 features and other important performance elements, including the latest data formats (XML), communication using compression, and messaging with security.
  • Support for virtualization and cloud environments.

See Also

Disclosure Statement

SPEC and the benchmark name SPECjbb are registered trademarks of Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation (SPEC). Results as of 3/26/2013, see http://www.spec.org for more information. SPARC T5-2 75,658 SPECjbb2013-MultiJVM max-jOPS, 23,334 SPECjbb2013-MultiJVM critical-jOPS. Sun Server X2-4 65,211 SPECjbb2013-MultiJVM max-jOPS, 22,057 SPECjbb2013-MultiJVM critical-jOPS. Sun Server X3-2 41,954 SPECjbb2013-MultiJVM max-jOPS, 13,305 SPECjbb2013-MultiJVM critical-jOPS. SPARC T4-2 34,804 SPECjbb2013-MultiJVM max-jOPS, 10,101 SPECjbb2013-MultiJVM critical-jOPS. HP ProLiant DL560p Gen8 66,007 SPECjbb2013-MultiJVM max-jOPS, 16,577 SPECjbb2013-MultiJVM critical-jOPS. HP ProLiant ML350p Gen8 40,047 SPECjbb2013-MultiJVM max-jOPS, 12,308 SPECjbb2013-MultiJVM critical-jOPS. Supermicro X8DTN+ 20,977 SPECjbb2013-MultiJVM max-jOPS, 6,188 SPECjbb2013-MultiJVM critical-jOPS. HP ProLiant ML310e Gen8 12,315 SPECjbb2013-MultiJVM max-jOPS, 2,908 SPECjbb2013-MultiJVM critical-jOPS. Intel R1304BT 6,198 SPECjbb2013-MultiJVM max-jOPS, 1,722 SPECjbb2013-MultiJVM critical-jOPS.

SPARC T5-8 Realizes SAP SD Two-Tier Benchmark World Record for 8 Chip Systems

Oracle's SPARC T5-8 server produced a world record result for systems with 8 processors on the two-tier SAP Sales and Distribution (SD) Standard Application Benchmark.

  • The SPARC T5-8 server achieved 40,000 users with running the two-tier SAP Sales and Distribution (SD) Standard Application Benchmark using SAP Enhancement package 5 for SAP ERP 6.0.

  • The SPARC T5-8 server is 57% faster than the IBM Power 760 8-chip running SAP Enhancement Package 5 for SAP ERP 6.0.

  • The SPARC T5-8 server delivers 5% more SAP users per chip than the IBM Power 780 12-chip running SAP Enhancement Package 5 for SAP ERP 6.0.

  • The SPARC T5-8 server solution was run with Oracle Solaris 11 and used Oracle Database 11g.

Performance Landscape

SAP-SD 2-Tier Performance Table (in decreasing performance order). SAP ERP 6.0 Enhancement Pack 5 for SAP ERP 6.0 results (New version of the benchmark as of May 2012).

System OS
Database
Users SAPS SAP
ERP/ECC
Release
Date
SPARC T5-8 Server
8x SPARC T5 @3.6 GHz, 2 TB
Solaris 11
Oracle 11g
40,000 220,950 EHP5 for SAP
ERP 6.0
25-Mar-13
IBM Power 760
8xPOWER7+ @3.41 GHz, 1024 GB
AIX 7.1
DB2 10
25,488 139,220 EHP5 for SAP
ERP 6.0
5-Feb-13

SAP ERP 6.0 Enhancement Pack 4 for SAP ERP 6.0 Results
(Old version of the benchmark, obsolete at the end of April, 2012)

System OS
Database
Users SAPS SAP
ERP/ECC
Release
Date
IBM Power 795
32xPOWER7 @4 GHz, 4 TB
AIX 7.1
DB2 9.7
126,063 688,630 EHP4 for SAP
ERP 6.0
15-Nov-10
SPARC Enterprise Server M9000
64xSPARC64 VII @2.88 GHz, 1152 GB
Solaris 10
Oracle 10g
32,000 175,600 EHP4 for SAP
ERP 6.0
18-Nov-09

Complete benchmark results may be found at the SAP benchmark website http://www.sap.com/benchmark.

Configuration Summary and Results

Hardware Configuration:

1 x SPARC T5-8 server with
8 x 3.6 GHz SPARC T5 processors (total of 8 processors / 128 cores / 1024 threads)
2 TB memory
1 x Sun ZFS Storage 7420 appliance with
72 x 600 GB 15K RPM 3.5" SAS-2 disk
32 x 32 GB memory
1 x Sun Fire X4270 M2 server configured as a COMSTAR device with
10 x 2 TB 7.2K 3.5" SAS disk
18 x 8 GB memory

Software Configuration:

Oracle Solaris 11
SAP enhancement package 5 for SAP ERP 6.0
Oracle Database 11g Release 2

Certified Results (published by SAP)

Performance:
40,000 benchmark users
SAP Certification:
2013008

Benchmark Description

The SAP Standard Application SD (Sales and Distribution) Benchmark is a two-tier ERP business test that is indicative of full business workloads of complete order processing and invoice processing, and demonstrates the ability to run both the application and database software on a single system. The SAP Standard Application SD Benchmark represents the critical tasks performed in real-world ERP business environments.

SAP is one of the premier world-wide ERP application providers, and maintains a suite of benchmark tests to demonstrate the performance of competitive systems on the various SAP products.

See Also

Disclosure Statement

Two-tier SAP Sales and Distribution (SD) Standard Application benchmarks SAP Enhancement package 5 for SAP ERP 6.0 as of 3/26/13:

SPARC T5-8 (8 processors, 128 cores, 1024 threads) 40,000 SAP SD users, 8 x 3.6 GHz SPARC T5, 2 TB memory, Oracle Database 11g, Oracle Solaris 11, Cert# 2013008. IBM Power 760 (8 processors, 48 cores, 192 threads) 25,488 SAP SD users, 8 x 3.41 GHz IBM POWER7+, 1024 GB memory, DB2 10, AIX 7.1, Cert#2013004.

Two-tier SAP Sales and Distribution (SD) Standard Application benchmarks SAP Enhancement package 4 for SAP ERP 6.0 as of 4/30/12:

IBM Power 795 (32 processors, 256 cores, 1024 threads) 126,063 SAP SD users, 32 x 4 GHz IBM POWER7, 4 TB memory, DB2 9.7, AIX7.1, Cert#2010046. SPARC Enterprise Server M9000 (64 processors, 256 cores, 512 threads) 32,000 SAP SD users, 64 x 2.88 GHz SPARC64 VII, 1152 GB memory, Oracle Database 10g, Oracle Solaris 10, Cert# 2009046.

SAP, R/3, reg TM of SAP AG in Germany and other countries. More info www.sap.com/benchmark

SPARC M5-32 Produces SAP SD Two-Tier Benchmark World Record for SAP Enhancement Package 5 for SAP ERP 6.0

Oracle's SPARC M5-32 server produced a world record result on the two-tier SAP Sales and Distribution (SD) Standard Application Benchmark using SAP Enhancement package 5 for SAP ERP 6.0.

  • The SPARC M5-32 server achieved 85,050 users running the two-tier SAP Sales and Distribution (SD) Standard Application Benchmark using SAP Enhancement package 5 for SAP ERP 6.0.

  • The SPARC M5-32 solution was run with Oracle Solaris 11 and used the Oracle Database 11g.

Performance Landscape

SAP-SD 2-Tier Performance Table (in decreasing performance order). SAP ERP 6.0 Enhancement Pack 5 for SAP ERP 6.0 results (new version of the benchmark as of May, 2012).

System OS
Database
Users SAPS SAP
ERP/ECC
Release
Date
SPARC M5-32 Server
32x SPARC M5 @3.6 GHz, 4 TB
Solaris 11
Oracle 11g
85,050 472,600 EHP5 for SAP
ERP 6.0
25-Mar-13
IBM Power 780
12xPOWER7+ @3.72 GHz, 1536 GB
AIX 7.1
DB2 10
57,024 311,720 EHP5 for SAP
ERP 6.0
3-Oct-12
IBM Power 760
8xPOWER7+ @3.41 GHz, 1024 GB
AIX 7.1
DB2 10
25,488 139,220 EHP5 for SAP
ERP 6.0
5-Feb-13

SAP ERP 6.0 Enhancement Pack 4 for SAP ERP 6.0 Results
(Old version of the benchmark, obsolete at the end of April, 2012)

System OS
Database
Users SAPS SAP
ERP/ECC
Release
Date
IBM Power 795
32xPOWER7 @4 GHz, 4 TB
AIX 7.1
DB2 9.7
126,063 688,630 EHP4 for SAP
ERP 6.0
15-Nov-10
SPARC Enterprise Server M9000
64xSPARC64 VII @2.88 GHz, 1152 GB
Solaris 10
Oracle 10g
32,000 175,600 EHP4 for SAP
ERP 6.0
18-Nov-09

Complete benchmark results may be found at the SAP benchmark website http://www.sap.com/benchmark.

Configuration Summary and Results

Hardware Configuration:

1 x SPARC M5-32 server with
32 x 3.6 GHz SPARC M5 processors (total of 32 processors / 192 cores / 1536 threads)
4 TB memory
1 x Sun Storage 2540-M2 (12 x 300 GB 5K RPM 3.5" SAS-2 disk & 2 GB cache)
Flash Storage

Software Configuration:

Oracle Solaris 11
SAP enhancement package 5 for SAP ERP 6.0
Oracle Database 11g Release 2

Certified Results (published by SAP)

Performance: 85,050 benchmark users
SAP Certification: 2013009

Benchmark Description

The SAP Standard Application SD (Sales and Distribution) Benchmark is a two-tier ERP business test that is indicative of full business workloads of complete order processing and invoice processing, and demonstrates the ability to run both the application and database software on a single system. The SAP Standard Application SD Benchmark represents the critical tasks performed in real-world ERP business environments.

SAP is one of the premier world-wide ERP application providers, and maintains a suite of benchmark tests to demonstrate the performance of competitive systems on the various SAP products.

See Also

Disclosure Statement

Two-tier SAP Sales and Distribution (SD) standard application benchmarks, SAP Enhancement package 5 for SAP ERP 6.0 as of 3/26/13:

SPARC M5-32 (32 processors, 192 cores, 1536 threads) 85,050 SAP SD users, 32 x 3.6 GHz SPARC M5, 4 TB memory, Oracle Database 11g, Oracle Solaris 11, Cert# 2013009. IBM Power 780 (12 processors, 96 cores, 384 threads) 57,024 SAP SD users, 12 x 3.72 GHz IBM POWER7+, 1536 GB memory, DB210, AIX7.1, Cert#2012033. IBM Power 760 (8 processors, 48 cores, 192 threads) 25,488 SAP SD users, 8 x 3.41 GHz IBM POWER7+, 1024 GB memory, DB2 10, AIX 7.1, Cert#2013004.

Two-tier SAP Sales and Distribution (SD) standard application benchmarks, SAP Enhancement package 4 for SAP ERP 6.0 as of 3/26/13:

IBM Power 795 (32 processors, 256 cores, 1024 threads) 126,063 SAP SD users, 32 x 4 GHz IBM POWER7, 4 TB memory, DB2 9.7, AIX7.1, Cert#2010046. SPARC Enterprise Server M9000 (64 processors, 256 cores, 512 threads) 32,000 SAP SD users, 64 x 2.88 GHz SPARC64 VII, 1152 GB memory, Oracle Database 10g, Oracle Solaris 10, Cert# 2009046.

SAP, R/3, reg TM of SAP AG in Germany and other countries. More info www.sap.com/benchmark

SPARC T5 Systems Deliver SPEC CPU2006 Rate Benchmark Multiple World Records

Oracle's SPARC T5 processor based systems delivered world record performance on the SPEC CPU2006 rate benchmarks. This was accomplished with Oracle Solaris 11.1 and Oracle Solaris Studio 12.3 software.

SPARC T5-8

  • The SPARC T5-8 server delivered world record SPEC CPU2006 rate benchmark results for systems with eight processors.

  • The SPARC T5-8 server achieved scores of 3750 SPECint_rate2006, 3490 SPECint_rate_base2006, 3020 SPECfp_rate2006, and 2770 SPECfp_rate_base2006.

  • The SPARC T5-8 server beat the 8 processor IBM Power 760 with POWER7+ processors by 1.7x on the SPECint_rate2006 benchmark and 2.2x on the SPECfp_rate2006 benchmark.

  • The SPARC T5-8 server beat the 8 processor IBM Power 780 with POWER7 processors by 35% on the SPECint_rate2006 benchmark and 14% on the SPECfp_rate2006 benchmark.

  • The SPARC T5-8 server beat the 8 processor HP DL980 G7 with Intel Xeon E7-4870 processors by 1.7x on the SPECint_rate2006 benchmark and 2.1x on the SPECfp_rate2006 benchmark.

SPARC T5-1B

  • The SPARC T5-1B server module delivered world record SPEC CPU2006 rate benchmark results for systems with one processor.

  • The SPARC T5-1B server module achieved scores of 467 SPECint_rate2006, 436 SPECint_rate_base2006, 369 SPECfp_rate2006, and 350 SPECfp_rate_base2006.

  • The SPARC T5-1B server module beat the 1 processor IBM Power 710 Express with a POWER7 processor by 62% on the SPECint_rate2006 benchmark and 49% on the SPECfp_rate2006 benchmark.

  • The SPARC T5-1B server module beat the 1 processor NEC Express5800/R120d-1M with an Intel Xeon E5-2690 processor by 31% on the SPECint_rate2006 benchmark. The SPARC T5-1B server module beat the 1 processor Huawei RH2288 V2 with an Intel Xeon E5-2690 processor by 44% on the SPECfp_rate2006 benchmark.

  • The SPARC T5-1B server module beat the 1 processor Supermicro A+ 1012G-MTF with an AMD Operton 6386 SE processor by 51% on the SPECint_rate2006 benchmark and 65% on the SPECfp_rate2006 benchmark.

Performance Landscape

Complete benchmark results are at the SPEC website, SPEC CPU2006 Results. The tables below provide the new Oracle results, as well as, select results from other vendors.

SPEC CPU2006 Rate Results – Eight Processors
System Processor ch/co/th * Peak Base
SPECint_rate2006
SPARC T5-8 SPARC T5, 3.6 GHz 8/128/1024 3750 3490
IBM Power 780 POWER7, 3.92 GHz 8/64/256 2770 2420
HP DL980 G7 Xeon E7-4870, 2.4 GHz 8/80/160 2180 2070
IBM Power 760 POWER7+, 3.42 GHz 8/48/192 2170 1480
Dell PowerEdge C6145 Opteron 6180 SE, 2.5 GHz 8/96/96 1670 1440
SPECfp_rate2006
SPARC T5-8 SPARC T5, 3.6 GHz 8/128/1024 3020 2770
IBM Power 780 POWER7, 3.92 GHz 8/64/256 2640 2410
HP DL980 G7 Xeon E7-4870, 2.4 GHz 8/80/160 1430 1380
IBM Power 760 POWER7+, 3.42 GHz 8/48/192 1400 1130
Dell PowerEdge C6145 Opteron 6180 SE, 2.5 GHz 8/96/96 1310 1200

* ch/co/th — chips / cores / threads enabled

SPEC CPU2006 Rate Results – One Processor
System Processor ch/co/th * Peak Base
SPECint_rate2006
SPARC T5-1B SPARC T5, 3.6 GHz 1/16/128 467 436
NEC Express5800/R120d-1M Xeon E5-2690, 2.9 GHz 1/8/16 357 343
Supermicro A+ 1012G-MTF Opteron 6386 SE, 2.8 GHz 1/16/16 309 269
IBM Power 710 Express POWER7, 3.556 GHz 1/8/32 289 255
SPECfp_rate2006
SPARC T5-1B SPARC T5, 3.6 GHz 1/16/128 369 350
Huawei RH2288 V2 Xeon E5-2690, 2.9 GHz 1/8/16 257 250
IBM Power 710 Express POWER7, 3.556 GHz 1/8/32 248 229
Supermicro A+ 1012G-MTF Opteron 6386 SE, 2.8 GHz 1/16/16 223 199

* ch/co/th — chips / cores / threads enabled

Configuration Summary

Systems Under Test:

SPARC T5-8
8 x 3.6 GHz SPARC T5 processors
4 TB memory (128 x 32 GB dimms)
2 TB on 8 x 600 GB 10K RPM SAS disks, arranged as 4 x 2-way mirrors
Oracle Solaris 11.1 (SRU 4.6)
Oracle Solaris Studio 12.3 1/13 PSE

SPARC T5-1B
1 x 3.6 GHz SPARC T5 processor
256 GB memory (16 x 16 GB dimms)
157 GB on 2 x 300 GB 10K RPM SAS disks (mirrored)
Oracle Solaris 11.1 (SRU 3.4)
Oracle Solaris Studio 12.3 1/13 PSE

Benchmark Description

SPEC CPU2006 is SPEC's most popular benchmark. It measures:

  • Speed — single copy performance of chip, memory, compiler
  • Rate — multiple copy (throughput)

The benchmark is also divided into integer intensive applications and floating point intensive applications:

  • integer: 12 benchmarks derived from real applications such as perl, gcc, XML processing, and pathfinding
  • floating point: 17 benchmarks derived from real applications, including chemistry, physics, genetics, and weather.

It is also divided depending upon the amount of optimization allowed:

  • base: optimization is consistent per compiled language, all benchmarks must be compiled with the same flags per language.
  • peak: specific compiler optimization is allowed per application.

The overall metrics for the benchmark which are commonly used are:

  • SPECint_rate2006, SPECint_rate_base2006: integer, rate
  • SPECfp_rate2006, SPECfp_rate_base2006: floating point, rate
  • SPECint2006, SPECint_base2006: integer, speed
  • SPECfp2006, SPECfp_base2006: floating point, speed

See Also

Disclosure Statement

SPEC and the benchmark names SPECfp and SPECint are registered trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. Results as of March 26, 2013 from www.spec.org and this report. SPARC T5-8: 3750 SPECint_rate2006, 3490 SPECint_rate_base2006, 3020 SPECfp_rate2006, 2770 SPECfp_rate_base2006; SPARC T5-1B: 467 SPECint_rate2006, 436 SPECint_rate_base2006, 369 SPECfp_rate2006, 350 SPECfp_rate_base2006.

SPARC T5-2 Achieves JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Benchmark World Records

Oracle produced World Record batch throughput for single system results on Oracle's JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Day-in-the-Life benchmark using Oracle's SPARC T5-2 server running Oracle Solaris Containers and consolidating JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, Oracle WebLogic servers and the Oracle Database 11g Release 2. There are two workloads tested: online plus batch workload and batch-only workload.

Online plus batch workload:

  • The SPARC T5-2 server delivered a result of 12,000 online users at 180 msec average response time while concurrently executing a mix of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne long and short batch processes at 198.5 UBEs/min (Universal Batch Engines per minute).

  • The SPARC T5-2 server online plus batch throughput is 2.7x higher than the IBM Power 770 server, both running 12,000 online users.

  • The SPARC T5-2 server online plus batch throughput is 6x higher per chip than the IBM Power 770 server. The SPARC T5-2 server has 2 chips and the IBM Power 770 has 4 chips, both ran 12,000 online users.

  • The SPARC T5-2 server online plus batch throughput is 3x higher per core than the IBM Power 770 server. Both servers have 32 cores and ran 12,000 online users.

Batch-only workload:

  • The SPARC T5-2 server delivered throughput of 880 UBEs/min while executing the batch-only workload (Long and Short batch processes).

  • The SPARC T5-2 server batch-only throughput is 2.7x faster per chip than the IBM Power 770 server. The SPARC T5-2 server has 2 chips and the IBM Power 770 has 4 chips.

  • The SPARC T5-2 server batch-only throughput is 1.4x higher per core than the IBM Power 770 server. Both servers have 32 cores.

  • The SPARC T5-2 server batch-only throughput is 61% faster than the Cisco multiple system solution.

  • The SPARC T5-2 server batch-only throughput is 5x faster per chip than the Cisco UCS B200/B250 M2 servers. The SPARC T5-2 server has 2 chips and the Cisco 3 server solution has 6 chips.

  • The SPARC T5-2 server batch-only throughput is 18x higher per core than the Cisco UCS B200/B250 M2 servers. The SPARC T5-2 server has 32 cores while the Cisco solution utilized 36 cores.

Both workloads:

  • The SPARC T5-2 server offers a 5.4x cost savings for the application server when compared to the IBM Power 770 application server.

  • The SPARC T5-2 server running Oracle Solaris Containers and consolidating JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, Oracle WebLogic servers and the Oracle Database 11g Release 2 utilized a maximum 65% of the available CPU power, leaving headroom for additional processing.

  • The database server in a shared-server configuration allows for optimized CPU resource utilization and significant memory savings on the SPARC T5-2 server without sacrificing performance.

Performance Landscape

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Day in the Life (DIL) Benchmark
Consolidated Online with Batch Workload
System Rack
Units (U)
Batch
Rate
(UBEs/min)
Online
Users
Users/
U
UBEs/
Core
UBEs/
Chip
Version
SPARC T5-2 (2 x SPARC T5, 3.6 GHz) 3 198.5 12000 4000 6.2 99 9.0.2
IBM Power 770 (4 x POWER7, 3.3 GHz) 8 65 12000 1500 2.0 16 9.0.2

Batch Rate (UBEs/min) — Batch transaction rate in UBEs per minute.

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Batch Only Benchmark
System Rack
Units (U)
Batch
Rate
(UBEs/min)
UBEs/
U
UBEs/
Core
UBEs/
Chip
Version
SPARC T5-2 (2 x SPARC T5, 3.6 GHz) 3 880 267 25 440 9.0.2
IBM Power 770 (4 x POWER7, 3.3 GHz) 8 643 81 20 161 9.0.2
2 x Cisco B200 M2 (2 x X5690, 3.46 GHz)
1 x Cisco B250 M2 (2 x X5680, 3.33 GHz)
3 546 182 15 91 9.0.2

Configuration Summary

Hardware Configuration:

1 x SPARC T5-2 server with
2 x SPARC T5 processors, 3.6 GHz
512 GB memory
4 x 300 GB 10K RPM SAS internal disk
2 x 300 GB internal SSD
4 x Sun Flash Accelerator F40 PCIe Card (4 x 93 GB)

Software Configuration:

Oracle Solaris 10 1/13
Oracle Solaris Containers
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne 9.0.2
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Tools (8.98.4.2)
Oracle WebLogic Server 11g (10.3.4)
Oracle HTTP Server 11g
Oracle Database 11g Release 2 (11.2.0.3)

Benchmark Description

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is an integrated applications suite of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software. Oracle offers 70 JD Edwards EnterpriseOne application modules to support a diverse set of business operations.

Oracle's Day in the Life (DIL) kit is a suite of scripts that exercises most common transactions of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne applications, including business processes such as payroll, sales order, purchase order, work order, and manufacturing processes, such as ship confirmation. These are labeled by industry acronyms such as SCM, CRM, HCM, SRM and FMS. The kit's scripts execute transactions typical of a mid-sized manufacturing company.

  • The workload consists of online transactions and the UBE – Universal Business Engine workload of 61 short and 4 long UBEs.

  • LoadRunner runs the DIL workload, collects the user’s transactions response times and reports the key metric of Combined Weighted Average Transaction Response time.

  • The UBE processes workload runs from the JD Enterprise Application server.

    • Oracle's UBE processes come as three flavors:
      • Short UBEs < 1 minute engage in Business Report and Summary Analysis,
      • Mid UBEs > 1 minute create a large report of Account, Balance, and Full Address,
      • Long UBEs > 2 minutes simulate Payroll, Sales Order, night only jobs.
    • The UBE workload generates large numbers of PDF files reports and log files.
    • The UBE Queues are categorized as the QBATCHD, a single threaded queue for large and medium UBEs, and the QPROCESS queue for short UBEs run concurrently.

Oracle's UBE process performance metric is Number of Maximum Concurrent UBE processes at transaction rate, UBEs/minute.

Key Points and Best Practices

Four Oracle Solaris processors sets were used with Oracle Solaris Containers assigned to the processor sets as follows:

  • one JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Application server, two Oracle WebLogic Servers 11g Release 1 each coupled with an Oracle Web Tier HTTP server instances (online workload), each in an Oracle Solaris Container (three total),

  • one JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Application server (for batch only workload) in an Oracle Solaris Container,

  • Oracle Database 11g Release 2.0.3 database in an Oracle Solaris Container,

  • the Oracle database log writer.

Other items of note:

  • Each Oracle WebLogic vertical cluster, with twelve managed instances, was configured in a dedicated webserver container in order to load balance users' requests and to provide the infrastructure to support high number of users with ease of deployment and high availability.

  • The database redo logs were configured on the raw disk partitions.

  • The mixed batch workload of 44 short UBEs and 8 long UBEs was executed concurrently with the 12,000 online application users, producing a sustained rate of 198.5 UBE/min.

See Also

Disclosure Statement

Copyright 2013, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Oracle and Java are registered trademarks of Oracle and/or its affiliates. Other names may be trademarks of their respective owners. Results as of 03/26/2013

SPARC T5-2 (SPARC T5-2 Server base package, 2xSPARC T5 16-core processors, 32x16GB-1066 DIMMS, 4x600GB 10K RPM 2.5. SAS-2 HDD,2x300GB SSDs, 4x Sun Flash Accelerator F40 PCIe Cards, 2x Power Cables) List Price $98,190. IBM Power 770 (IBM Power 770:9917 Model MMC, 2x3.3GHz 16-core, 32x one processor activation, 2xCEC Enclosure with IBM Bezel, I/O Backplane and System Midplane,2x Service Processor, 16x 0/64GB DDR3 Memory (4x16GB) DIMMS-1066MHz Power7 CoD Memory, 24x Activation of 1 GB DDR3 Power7 Memory, 10x Activation of 100GB DDR3 Power7 Memory, 2x Disk/Media Backplane. 2x 300GB SAS 15K RPM 2.5. HDD (AIX/Linux only), 1x SATA slimline DVD-RAM drive, 4x AC Power Supply 1925W) List Price $532,143. Source: ibm.com, collected 03/18/2013.

About

BestPerf is the source of Oracle performance expertise. In this blog, Oracle's Strategic Applications Engineering group explores Oracle's performance results and shares best practices learned from working on Enterprise-wide Applications.

Index Pages
Search

Archives
« April 2014
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
  
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
   
       
Today