Key concepts:
SemWeb = high resolution web
SemWeb = relational unstructured data
SemWeb = meaning-ful links rather than just links
Nova Spivack at The Next Web Conference 2008 from Boris Veldhuijzen van Zanten on Vimeo.
« Enterprise 2.0 Architecture Podcast Series Part 3 | Main | Paper Accepted for WMSCI 2009 »
Nova Spivack on SemWeb
Search All Blogs
Google Search
About This Entry
This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on March 13, 2009 5:18 PM.
The previous post in this blog was Enterprise 2.0 Architecture Podcast Series Part 3.
The next post in this blog is Paper Accepted for WMSCI 2009 .
Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.
Top Tags
- 10gR4
- 2009
- acquisition
- adoption
- advice
- aggregates
- agile
- AIIM
- AJAX
- ALUI
- andy
- anonymous
- API
- architecture
- Archiving
- article
- Autonomy
- avatar
- awards
- Bad News
- bea
- BI
- billycripe
- blog
- Blogosphere
- Book
- BPEL
- BPM
- business
- Business Intelligence
- business process
- Calendar
- case study
- chicken
- click
- cloud
- CMIS
- CMS Watch
- Collaborate
- collaborate
- collaboration
- communication
- community
- components
- Conference
- conference
- cool
- CRM
- CSC
- culture
- cycling
- deck
- design
- documentation
- ECM
- economy
- EIM
- elephant
- encryption
- Enterprise 2.0
- environment
- ethics
- events
- fail
- FDA
- fruit
- Frustration
- funny
- Fusion
- good news
- Green
- headlines
- health
- How To
- how to
- idea
- information
- Integration
- internet
- interview
- interwoven
- ioug
- IRM
- J2SE
- Java
- jobs
- JRE
- JSON
- JVM
- keynote
- keywords
- leadership
- maillot vert
- Management
- marketing
- mashup
- meetup
- Nova Spivack
- NY Times
- OBIEE
- oops
- OOW
- OpenID
- OpenText
- Oracle Content Server
- oracle db
- paper
- participation
- Partner
- patch
- Performance
- platform
- podcast
- policy
- politics
- Portal
- predictions
- presentation
- proof
- psychology
- public service
- purpose
- quality
- Red Stack
- relevance
- Reply
- research
- REST
- Retention
- rights
- robots
- ROI
- RSS
- RTD
- sales
- science
- Search
- security
- Semantic
- Seminar
- SemWeb
- sentiment
- Siebel
- signal
- Site Studio
- slides
- SOA
- Social
- sprinter
- standards
- strategy
- tags
- text extraction
- tools
- topography
- tour de france
- transmission
- travel
- trends
- tribes
- trus
- Tuning
- UCM
- UOA
- updates
- use case
- Value
- Video
- video
- Vignette
- volunteer
- WCM
- Web 2.0
- web 2.0
- Web 3.0
- webcast
- webcenter
- wiki
- win
- WOA
Comments (2)
One question would be how can the Semantic Web rate/handle authority? The "Evil" conversation at the end touches on it but entirely blows the answer.
The typical evil is scamming and this model seems to miss the key issue of understanding relative authority on content. (i.e. is the Mayo Clinic website more authoritative and be returned preferentially over Billy's Medicine Cabinet?)
Definitions don't cover it.
This is a key driver for Google and Yahoo in the changing of their approaches (almost weekly now)
Posted by David Johnson | March 16, 2009 2:45 PM
Posted on March 16, 2009 14:45
take a look at this post from the SemWeb blog
http://blog.semantic-web.at/2009/03/13/keep-the-semantic-web-trusty/
it's all about how the W3C is building in trust/security to the SemWeb specifications. Of course specification doesn't mean security, but it is a step in the right direction.
Posted by billycripe | March 17, 2009 7:41 AM
Posted on March 17, 2009 07:41